The Creation of a Scandinavian Provincial Law: How was it done?

Stefan Brink

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

It is well known that lawmaking was inseparable from kingship in England and on the continent and, therefore, there has been a predominant tendency to see medieval laws in Scandinavia in a regal context. In this light, the initiators of laws have been kings and men belonging to the upper stratum of society, and the laws themselves are seen as reflecting the societal situation when they were written down. This article focuses on ‘peripheral’ laws, such as the Icelandic Grágás, the main Svea Law, the Uppland Law and the Hälsinge Law. It attempts to show that such laws were not inventions of any one person or group in the thirteenth or fourteenth century, and that they cannot only be mirroring the time in which they were written down. Rather there are complex layers in the versions of these laws that survive: some old customary law, some probably newly composed law, some having their roots in Roman legal tradition and some in canon law. The picture which emerges is much less clear-cut than has been supposed, showing many regional differences and peculiarities.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)432-442
Number of pages11
JournalHistorical Research
Volume86
Issue number233
Early online date1 Jul 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2013

Fingerprint

Law
Provincial
fourteenth century
thirteenth century
Scandinavia
social stratum
regional difference
invention
human being
Group

Cite this

The Creation of a Scandinavian Provincial Law : How was it done? / Brink, Stefan.

In: Historical Research, Vol. 86, No. 233, 08.2013, p. 432-442.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Brink, Stefan. / The Creation of a Scandinavian Provincial Law : How was it done?. In: Historical Research. 2013 ; Vol. 86, No. 233. pp. 432-442.
@article{430a699640bc470f879c3fb7de4c76c3,
title = "The Creation of a Scandinavian Provincial Law: How was it done?",
abstract = "It is well known that lawmaking was inseparable from kingship in England and on the continent and, therefore, there has been a predominant tendency to see medieval laws in Scandinavia in a regal context. In this light, the initiators of laws have been kings and men belonging to the upper stratum of society, and the laws themselves are seen as reflecting the societal situation when they were written down. This article focuses on ‘peripheral’ laws, such as the Icelandic Gr{\'a}g{\'a}s, the main Svea Law, the Uppland Law and the H{\"a}lsinge Law. It attempts to show that such laws were not inventions of any one person or group in the thirteenth or fourteenth century, and that they cannot only be mirroring the time in which they were written down. Rather there are complex layers in the versions of these laws that survive: some old customary law, some probably newly composed law, some having their roots in Roman legal tradition and some in canon law. The picture which emerges is much less clear-cut than has been supposed, showing many regional differences and peculiarities.",
author = "Stefan Brink",
year = "2013",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1111/1468-2281.12006",
language = "English",
volume = "86",
pages = "432--442",
journal = "Historical Research",
issn = "1468-2281",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "233",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Creation of a Scandinavian Provincial Law

T2 - How was it done?

AU - Brink, Stefan

PY - 2013/8

Y1 - 2013/8

N2 - It is well known that lawmaking was inseparable from kingship in England and on the continent and, therefore, there has been a predominant tendency to see medieval laws in Scandinavia in a regal context. In this light, the initiators of laws have been kings and men belonging to the upper stratum of society, and the laws themselves are seen as reflecting the societal situation when they were written down. This article focuses on ‘peripheral’ laws, such as the Icelandic Grágás, the main Svea Law, the Uppland Law and the Hälsinge Law. It attempts to show that such laws were not inventions of any one person or group in the thirteenth or fourteenth century, and that they cannot only be mirroring the time in which they were written down. Rather there are complex layers in the versions of these laws that survive: some old customary law, some probably newly composed law, some having their roots in Roman legal tradition and some in canon law. The picture which emerges is much less clear-cut than has been supposed, showing many regional differences and peculiarities.

AB - It is well known that lawmaking was inseparable from kingship in England and on the continent and, therefore, there has been a predominant tendency to see medieval laws in Scandinavia in a regal context. In this light, the initiators of laws have been kings and men belonging to the upper stratum of society, and the laws themselves are seen as reflecting the societal situation when they were written down. This article focuses on ‘peripheral’ laws, such as the Icelandic Grágás, the main Svea Law, the Uppland Law and the Hälsinge Law. It attempts to show that such laws were not inventions of any one person or group in the thirteenth or fourteenth century, and that they cannot only be mirroring the time in which they were written down. Rather there are complex layers in the versions of these laws that survive: some old customary law, some probably newly composed law, some having their roots in Roman legal tradition and some in canon law. The picture which emerges is much less clear-cut than has been supposed, showing many regional differences and peculiarities.

U2 - 10.1111/1468-2281.12006

DO - 10.1111/1468-2281.12006

M3 - Article

VL - 86

SP - 432

EP - 442

JO - Historical Research

JF - Historical Research

SN - 1468-2281

IS - 233

ER -