The Development, Assessment, and Selection of Questionnaires

Konrad Pesudovs, Jennifer Margaret Burr, Clare Harley, David B. Elliott

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

205 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Patient-reported outcome measurement has become accepted as an important component of comprehensive outcomes research. Researchers wishing to use a patient-reported measure must either develop their own questionnaire (called an instrument in the research literature) or choose from the myriad of instruments previously reported. This article summarizes how previously developed instruments are best assessed using a systematic process and we propose a system of quality assessment so that clinicians and researchers can determine whether there exists an appropriately developed and validated instrument that matches their particular needs. These quality assessment criteria may also be useful to guide new instrument development and refinement. We welcome debate over the appropriateness of these criteria as this will lead to the evolution of better quality assessment criteria and in turn better assessment of patient-reported outcomes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)663-674
Number of pages12
JournalOptometry and Vision Science
Volume84
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2007

Keywords

  • factor analysis
  • instrument
  • quality assessment
  • quality of life
  • questionnaire
  • Rasch analysis
  • reliability
  • responsiveness
  • validity
  • visual disability
  • quality-of-life
  • intraclass correlation-coefficient
  • institute-refractive error
  • visual functioning questionnaire
  • vision impairment questionnaire
  • assistive devices
  • psychometric properties
  • disability variables
  • surgery outcomes

Cite this

The Development, Assessment, and Selection of Questionnaires. / Pesudovs, Konrad; Burr, Jennifer Margaret; Harley, Clare; Elliott, David B.

In: Optometry and Vision Science, Vol. 84, No. 8, 08.2007, p. 663-674.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Pesudovs, K, Burr, JM, Harley, C & Elliott, DB 2007, 'The Development, Assessment, and Selection of Questionnaires', Optometry and Vision Science, vol. 84, no. 8, pp. 663-674. https://doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0b013e318141fe75
Pesudovs, Konrad ; Burr, Jennifer Margaret ; Harley, Clare ; Elliott, David B. / The Development, Assessment, and Selection of Questionnaires. In: Optometry and Vision Science. 2007 ; Vol. 84, No. 8. pp. 663-674.
@article{305d7d570bbc4f679f9b5e1803d34ba6,
title = "The Development, Assessment, and Selection of Questionnaires",
abstract = "Patient-reported outcome measurement has become accepted as an important component of comprehensive outcomes research. Researchers wishing to use a patient-reported measure must either develop their own questionnaire (called an instrument in the research literature) or choose from the myriad of instruments previously reported. This article summarizes how previously developed instruments are best assessed using a systematic process and we propose a system of quality assessment so that clinicians and researchers can determine whether there exists an appropriately developed and validated instrument that matches their particular needs. These quality assessment criteria may also be useful to guide new instrument development and refinement. We welcome debate over the appropriateness of these criteria as this will lead to the evolution of better quality assessment criteria and in turn better assessment of patient-reported outcomes.",
keywords = "factor analysis, instrument, quality assessment, quality of life, questionnaire, Rasch analysis, reliability, responsiveness, validity, visual disability, quality-of-life, intraclass correlation-coefficient, institute-refractive error, visual functioning questionnaire, vision impairment questionnaire, assistive devices, psychometric properties, disability variables, surgery outcomes",
author = "Konrad Pesudovs and Burr, {Jennifer Margaret} and Clare Harley and Elliott, {David B.}",
year = "2007",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1097/OPX.0b013e318141fe75",
language = "English",
volume = "84",
pages = "663--674",
journal = "Optometry and Vision Science",
issn = "1040-5488",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Development, Assessment, and Selection of Questionnaires

AU - Pesudovs, Konrad

AU - Burr, Jennifer Margaret

AU - Harley, Clare

AU - Elliott, David B.

PY - 2007/8

Y1 - 2007/8

N2 - Patient-reported outcome measurement has become accepted as an important component of comprehensive outcomes research. Researchers wishing to use a patient-reported measure must either develop their own questionnaire (called an instrument in the research literature) or choose from the myriad of instruments previously reported. This article summarizes how previously developed instruments are best assessed using a systematic process and we propose a system of quality assessment so that clinicians and researchers can determine whether there exists an appropriately developed and validated instrument that matches their particular needs. These quality assessment criteria may also be useful to guide new instrument development and refinement. We welcome debate over the appropriateness of these criteria as this will lead to the evolution of better quality assessment criteria and in turn better assessment of patient-reported outcomes.

AB - Patient-reported outcome measurement has become accepted as an important component of comprehensive outcomes research. Researchers wishing to use a patient-reported measure must either develop their own questionnaire (called an instrument in the research literature) or choose from the myriad of instruments previously reported. This article summarizes how previously developed instruments are best assessed using a systematic process and we propose a system of quality assessment so that clinicians and researchers can determine whether there exists an appropriately developed and validated instrument that matches their particular needs. These quality assessment criteria may also be useful to guide new instrument development and refinement. We welcome debate over the appropriateness of these criteria as this will lead to the evolution of better quality assessment criteria and in turn better assessment of patient-reported outcomes.

KW - factor analysis

KW - instrument

KW - quality assessment

KW - quality of life

KW - questionnaire

KW - Rasch analysis

KW - reliability

KW - responsiveness

KW - validity

KW - visual disability

KW - quality-of-life

KW - intraclass correlation-coefficient

KW - institute-refractive error

KW - visual functioning questionnaire

KW - vision impairment questionnaire

KW - assistive devices

KW - psychometric properties

KW - disability variables

KW - surgery outcomes

U2 - 10.1097/OPX.0b013e318141fe75

DO - 10.1097/OPX.0b013e318141fe75

M3 - Article

VL - 84

SP - 663

EP - 674

JO - Optometry and Vision Science

JF - Optometry and Vision Science

SN - 1040-5488

IS - 8

ER -