The Development, Assessment, and Selection of Questionnaires

Konrad Pesudovs, Jennifer Margaret Burr, Clare Harley, David B. Elliott

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

208 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Patient-reported outcome measurement has become accepted as an important component of comprehensive outcomes research. Researchers wishing to use a patient-reported measure must either develop their own questionnaire (called an instrument in the research literature) or choose from the myriad of instruments previously reported. This article summarizes how previously developed instruments are best assessed using a systematic process and we propose a system of quality assessment so that clinicians and researchers can determine whether there exists an appropriately developed and validated instrument that matches their particular needs. These quality assessment criteria may also be useful to guide new instrument development and refinement. We welcome debate over the appropriateness of these criteria as this will lead to the evolution of better quality assessment criteria and in turn better assessment of patient-reported outcomes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)663-674
Number of pages12
JournalOptometry and Vision Science
Volume84
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2007

Keywords

  • factor analysis
  • instrument
  • quality assessment
  • quality of life
  • questionnaire
  • Rasch analysis
  • reliability
  • responsiveness
  • validity
  • visual disability
  • quality-of-life
  • intraclass correlation-coefficient
  • institute-refractive error
  • visual functioning questionnaire
  • vision impairment questionnaire
  • assistive devices
  • psychometric properties
  • disability variables
  • surgery outcomes

Cite this