The effects of array structure and secondary cognitive task demand on processes of visual search

Steven W. Savage (Corresponding Author), Douglas D. Potter, Benjamin W. Tatler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Many aspects of our everyday behaviour require that we search for objects. However, in real situations search is often conducted while internal and external factors compete for our attention resources. Cognitive distraction interferes with our ability to search for targets, increasing search times. Here we consider whether effects of cognitive distraction interfere differentially with three distinct phases of search: initiating search, overtly scanning through items in the display, and verifying that the object is indeed the target of search once it has been fixated. Furthermore, we consider whether strategic components of visual search that emerge when searching items organized into structured arrays are susceptible to cognitive distraction or not. We used Gilchrist & Harvey’s (2006) structured and unstructured visual search paradigm with the addition of Savage, Potter & Tatler’s (2013) secondary puzzle task. Cognitive load influenced two phases of search: 1) scanning times and 2) verification times. Under high load, fixation durations were longer and refixations of distracters were more common. In terms of scanning strategy, we replicated Gilchrist & Harvey’s (2006) findings of more systematic search for structured arrays than unstructured ones. We also found an effect of cognitive load on this aspect of search but only in structured arrays. Our findings suggest that our eyes, by default, produce an autonomous scanning pattern that is modulated but not completely eliminated by secondary cognitive load.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)37-46
Number of pages10
JournalVision Research
Volume153
Early online date10 Oct 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2018

Keywords

  • visual search
  • cognitive control and automaticity
  • eye movements and visual attention

Cite this

The effects of array structure and secondary cognitive task demand on processes of visual search. / Savage, Steven W. (Corresponding Author); Potter, Douglas D.; Tatler, Benjamin W.

In: Vision Research, Vol. 153, 12.2018, p. 37-46.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9e722653297a4799b75bbc0b4dffcf94,
title = "The effects of array structure and secondary cognitive task demand on processes of visual search",
abstract = "Many aspects of our everyday behaviour require that we search for objects. However, in real situations search is often conducted while internal and external factors compete for our attention resources. Cognitive distraction interferes with our ability to search for targets, increasing search times. Here we consider whether effects of cognitive distraction interfere differentially with three distinct phases of search: initiating search, overtly scanning through items in the display, and verifying that the object is indeed the target of search once it has been fixated. Furthermore, we consider whether strategic components of visual search that emerge when searching items organized into structured arrays are susceptible to cognitive distraction or not. We used Gilchrist & Harvey’s (2006) structured and unstructured visual search paradigm with the addition of Savage, Potter & Tatler’s (2013) secondary puzzle task. Cognitive load influenced two phases of search: 1) scanning times and 2) verification times. Under high load, fixation durations were longer and refixations of distracters were more common. In terms of scanning strategy, we replicated Gilchrist & Harvey’s (2006) findings of more systematic search for structured arrays than unstructured ones. We also found an effect of cognitive load on this aspect of search but only in structured arrays. Our findings suggest that our eyes, by default, produce an autonomous scanning pattern that is modulated but not completely eliminated by secondary cognitive load.",
keywords = "visual search, cognitive control and automaticity, eye movements and visual attention",
author = "Savage, {Steven W.} and Potter, {Douglas D.} and Tatler, {Benjamin W.}",
year = "2018",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1016/j.visres.2018.09.004",
language = "English",
volume = "153",
pages = "37--46",
journal = "Vision Research",
issn = "0042-6989",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effects of array structure and secondary cognitive task demand on processes of visual search

AU - Savage, Steven W.

AU - Potter, Douglas D.

AU - Tatler, Benjamin W.

PY - 2018/12

Y1 - 2018/12

N2 - Many aspects of our everyday behaviour require that we search for objects. However, in real situations search is often conducted while internal and external factors compete for our attention resources. Cognitive distraction interferes with our ability to search for targets, increasing search times. Here we consider whether effects of cognitive distraction interfere differentially with three distinct phases of search: initiating search, overtly scanning through items in the display, and verifying that the object is indeed the target of search once it has been fixated. Furthermore, we consider whether strategic components of visual search that emerge when searching items organized into structured arrays are susceptible to cognitive distraction or not. We used Gilchrist & Harvey’s (2006) structured and unstructured visual search paradigm with the addition of Savage, Potter & Tatler’s (2013) secondary puzzle task. Cognitive load influenced two phases of search: 1) scanning times and 2) verification times. Under high load, fixation durations were longer and refixations of distracters were more common. In terms of scanning strategy, we replicated Gilchrist & Harvey’s (2006) findings of more systematic search for structured arrays than unstructured ones. We also found an effect of cognitive load on this aspect of search but only in structured arrays. Our findings suggest that our eyes, by default, produce an autonomous scanning pattern that is modulated but not completely eliminated by secondary cognitive load.

AB - Many aspects of our everyday behaviour require that we search for objects. However, in real situations search is often conducted while internal and external factors compete for our attention resources. Cognitive distraction interferes with our ability to search for targets, increasing search times. Here we consider whether effects of cognitive distraction interfere differentially with three distinct phases of search: initiating search, overtly scanning through items in the display, and verifying that the object is indeed the target of search once it has been fixated. Furthermore, we consider whether strategic components of visual search that emerge when searching items organized into structured arrays are susceptible to cognitive distraction or not. We used Gilchrist & Harvey’s (2006) structured and unstructured visual search paradigm with the addition of Savage, Potter & Tatler’s (2013) secondary puzzle task. Cognitive load influenced two phases of search: 1) scanning times and 2) verification times. Under high load, fixation durations were longer and refixations of distracters were more common. In terms of scanning strategy, we replicated Gilchrist & Harvey’s (2006) findings of more systematic search for structured arrays than unstructured ones. We also found an effect of cognitive load on this aspect of search but only in structured arrays. Our findings suggest that our eyes, by default, produce an autonomous scanning pattern that is modulated but not completely eliminated by secondary cognitive load.

KW - visual search

KW - cognitive control and automaticity

KW - eye movements and visual attention

U2 - 10.1016/j.visres.2018.09.004

DO - 10.1016/j.visres.2018.09.004

M3 - Article

VL - 153

SP - 37

EP - 46

JO - Vision Research

JF - Vision Research

SN - 0042-6989

ER -