The emergence of biodiversity conflicts from biodiversity impacts

characteristics and management strategies

Juliette C. Young, Mariella Marzano, Rehema M. White, David I. McCracken, Steve M. Redpath, David N. Carss, Christopher P. Quine, Allan D. Watt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

80 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Conflicts between the conservation of biodiversity and other human activities occur in all habitats and can impact severely upon socio-economic and biological parameters. In a changing environment, with increasing pressure on ecosystem goods and services and increasing urgency for biodiversity conservation, these conflicts are likely to increase in importance and magnitude and negatively affect biodiversity and human well-being. It is essential, however, to better understand what is meant by 'biodiversity conflicts' in order to develop ways to manage these effectively. In view of the complexity of the social and ecological contexts of conflicts, this paper explores 'biodiversity impacts' linked to agricultural, forestry and other sectoral activities in the UK. The paper then describes the transition from 'biodiversity impacts' to 'biodiversity conflicts', illustrating this concept with specific examples. While generalisations relating to conflict management are made difficult by their unique contextual settings, this paper suggests approaches for their management, based on the experiences of scientists who have been involved in managing conflicts. We consider the role of science and scientists; trust and dialogue; and temporal and spatial scales in biodiversity conflicts and highlight the combined role they play in successful biodiversity conflict management. Recommendations are also made for future research on biodiversity conflicts in a changing environment.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3973-3990
Number of pages18
JournalBiodiversity and Conservation
Volume19
Issue number14
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2010

Keywords

  • agriculture
  • biodiversity conflicts
  • biodiversity impacts
  • conflict management
  • conservation policy
  • forestry
  • livelihoods
  • participation
  • predator management
  • sustainability
  • natural-resource management
  • human-wildlife conflict
  • red grouse
  • hen harriers
  • recreational disturbance
  • public-participation
  • stakeholder involvement
  • raptor predation
  • land-use
  • conservation

Cite this

The emergence of biodiversity conflicts from biodiversity impacts : characteristics and management strategies. / Young, Juliette C.; Marzano, Mariella; White, Rehema M.; McCracken, David I.; Redpath, Steve M.; Carss, David N.; Quine, Christopher P.; Watt, Allan D.

In: Biodiversity and Conservation, Vol. 19, No. 14, 12.2010, p. 3973-3990.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Young, Juliette C. ; Marzano, Mariella ; White, Rehema M. ; McCracken, David I. ; Redpath, Steve M. ; Carss, David N. ; Quine, Christopher P. ; Watt, Allan D. / The emergence of biodiversity conflicts from biodiversity impacts : characteristics and management strategies. In: Biodiversity and Conservation. 2010 ; Vol. 19, No. 14. pp. 3973-3990.
@article{8ede7d0246d640c692902c1308be3d6b,
title = "The emergence of biodiversity conflicts from biodiversity impacts: characteristics and management strategies",
abstract = "Conflicts between the conservation of biodiversity and other human activities occur in all habitats and can impact severely upon socio-economic and biological parameters. In a changing environment, with increasing pressure on ecosystem goods and services and increasing urgency for biodiversity conservation, these conflicts are likely to increase in importance and magnitude and negatively affect biodiversity and human well-being. It is essential, however, to better understand what is meant by 'biodiversity conflicts' in order to develop ways to manage these effectively. In view of the complexity of the social and ecological contexts of conflicts, this paper explores 'biodiversity impacts' linked to agricultural, forestry and other sectoral activities in the UK. The paper then describes the transition from 'biodiversity impacts' to 'biodiversity conflicts', illustrating this concept with specific examples. While generalisations relating to conflict management are made difficult by their unique contextual settings, this paper suggests approaches for their management, based on the experiences of scientists who have been involved in managing conflicts. We consider the role of science and scientists; trust and dialogue; and temporal and spatial scales in biodiversity conflicts and highlight the combined role they play in successful biodiversity conflict management. Recommendations are also made for future research on biodiversity conflicts in a changing environment.",
keywords = "agriculture, biodiversity conflicts, biodiversity impacts, conflict management, conservation policy, forestry, livelihoods, participation, predator management, sustainability, natural-resource management, human-wildlife conflict, red grouse, hen harriers, recreational disturbance, public-participation, stakeholder involvement, raptor predation, land-use, conservation",
author = "Young, {Juliette C.} and Mariella Marzano and White, {Rehema M.} and McCracken, {David I.} and Redpath, {Steve M.} and Carss, {David N.} and Quine, {Christopher P.} and Watt, {Allan D.}",
year = "2010",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1007/s10531-010-9941-7",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "3973--3990",
journal = "Biodiversity and Conservation",
issn = "0960-3115",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "14",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The emergence of biodiversity conflicts from biodiversity impacts

T2 - characteristics and management strategies

AU - Young, Juliette C.

AU - Marzano, Mariella

AU - White, Rehema M.

AU - McCracken, David I.

AU - Redpath, Steve M.

AU - Carss, David N.

AU - Quine, Christopher P.

AU - Watt, Allan D.

PY - 2010/12

Y1 - 2010/12

N2 - Conflicts between the conservation of biodiversity and other human activities occur in all habitats and can impact severely upon socio-economic and biological parameters. In a changing environment, with increasing pressure on ecosystem goods and services and increasing urgency for biodiversity conservation, these conflicts are likely to increase in importance and magnitude and negatively affect biodiversity and human well-being. It is essential, however, to better understand what is meant by 'biodiversity conflicts' in order to develop ways to manage these effectively. In view of the complexity of the social and ecological contexts of conflicts, this paper explores 'biodiversity impacts' linked to agricultural, forestry and other sectoral activities in the UK. The paper then describes the transition from 'biodiversity impacts' to 'biodiversity conflicts', illustrating this concept with specific examples. While generalisations relating to conflict management are made difficult by their unique contextual settings, this paper suggests approaches for their management, based on the experiences of scientists who have been involved in managing conflicts. We consider the role of science and scientists; trust and dialogue; and temporal and spatial scales in biodiversity conflicts and highlight the combined role they play in successful biodiversity conflict management. Recommendations are also made for future research on biodiversity conflicts in a changing environment.

AB - Conflicts between the conservation of biodiversity and other human activities occur in all habitats and can impact severely upon socio-economic and biological parameters. In a changing environment, with increasing pressure on ecosystem goods and services and increasing urgency for biodiversity conservation, these conflicts are likely to increase in importance and magnitude and negatively affect biodiversity and human well-being. It is essential, however, to better understand what is meant by 'biodiversity conflicts' in order to develop ways to manage these effectively. In view of the complexity of the social and ecological contexts of conflicts, this paper explores 'biodiversity impacts' linked to agricultural, forestry and other sectoral activities in the UK. The paper then describes the transition from 'biodiversity impacts' to 'biodiversity conflicts', illustrating this concept with specific examples. While generalisations relating to conflict management are made difficult by their unique contextual settings, this paper suggests approaches for their management, based on the experiences of scientists who have been involved in managing conflicts. We consider the role of science and scientists; trust and dialogue; and temporal and spatial scales in biodiversity conflicts and highlight the combined role they play in successful biodiversity conflict management. Recommendations are also made for future research on biodiversity conflicts in a changing environment.

KW - agriculture

KW - biodiversity conflicts

KW - biodiversity impacts

KW - conflict management

KW - conservation policy

KW - forestry

KW - livelihoods

KW - participation

KW - predator management

KW - sustainability

KW - natural-resource management

KW - human-wildlife conflict

KW - red grouse

KW - hen harriers

KW - recreational disturbance

KW - public-participation

KW - stakeholder involvement

KW - raptor predation

KW - land-use

KW - conservation

U2 - 10.1007/s10531-010-9941-7

DO - 10.1007/s10531-010-9941-7

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 3973

EP - 3990

JO - Biodiversity and Conservation

JF - Biodiversity and Conservation

SN - 0960-3115

IS - 14

ER -