The Implications of Different Acceptable Prospective Returns to Investment for Activity in the UKCS

Research output: Working paper

15 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper examines the effects of different investment hurdle rates on capital expenditure and production relating to new oil and gas fields in the UK Continental Shelf over the period 2017-2050. Financial simulation modelling, including the Monte Carlo technique to model future fields, is employed along with a large database of discovered but undeveloped fields. The investment hurdles employed are (1) real IRR of 10%, (2) real IRR of 15%, (3) minimum NPV of £10 million, (4) NPV/I ≥ 0.3, and (5) NPV/I ≥ 0.5. The last 2 hurdles reflect significant capital rationing. At oil prices of $50 many projects fail even the least demanding hurdle. At $60 price many more projects pass the hurdles but use of the NPV/I ratios result in much lower investment and production over the period.
Original languageEnglish
PublisherUniversity of Aberdeen
Pagesi - 61
Number of pages68
Volume141
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2017

Publication series

NameNorth Sea Study Occasional Papers
No.141
ISSN (Electronic)0143-022X

Fingerprint

Rationing
Capital expenditures
Gas
Data base
Oil
Hurdle rates
Simulation modeling
Oil prices

Keywords

  • investment hurdles
  • activity in the UKCS
  • discount rates
  • capital rationing

Cite this

Kemp, A. G., & Stephen, L. (2017). The Implications of Different Acceptable Prospective Returns to Investment for Activity in the UKCS. (pp. i - 61). (North Sea Study Occasional Papers; No. 141). University of Aberdeen.

The Implications of Different Acceptable Prospective Returns to Investment for Activity in the UKCS. / Kemp, Alexander G.; Stephen, Linda.

University of Aberdeen, 2017. p. i - 61 (North Sea Study Occasional Papers; No. 141).

Research output: Working paper

Kemp, AG & Stephen, L 2017 'The Implications of Different Acceptable Prospective Returns to Investment for Activity in the UKCS' North Sea Study Occasional Papers, no. 141, University of Aberdeen, pp. i - 61.
Kemp AG, Stephen L. The Implications of Different Acceptable Prospective Returns to Investment for Activity in the UKCS. University of Aberdeen. 2017 Sep, p. i - 61. (North Sea Study Occasional Papers; 141).
@techreport{2a9823e8d13a4f3bbb3227f4a4244e9c,
title = "The Implications of Different Acceptable Prospective Returns to Investment for Activity in the UKCS",
abstract = "This paper examines the effects of different investment hurdle rates on capital expenditure and production relating to new oil and gas fields in the UK Continental Shelf over the period 2017-2050. Financial simulation modelling, including the Monte Carlo technique to model future fields, is employed along with a large database of discovered but undeveloped fields. The investment hurdles employed are (1) real IRR of 10{\%}, (2) real IRR of 15{\%}, (3) minimum NPV of £10 million, (4) NPV/I ≥ 0.3, and (5) NPV/I ≥ 0.5. The last 2 hurdles reflect significant capital rationing. At oil prices of $50 many projects fail even the least demanding hurdle. At $60 price many more projects pass the hurdles but use of the NPV/I ratios result in much lower investment and production over the period.",
keywords = "investment hurdles, activity in the UKCS, discount rates, capital rationing",
author = "Kemp, {Alexander G.} and Linda Stephen",
year = "2017",
month = "9",
language = "English",
volume = "141",
series = "North Sea Study Occasional Papers",
publisher = "University of Aberdeen",
number = "141",
pages = "i -- 61",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "University of Aberdeen",

}

TY - UNPB

T1 - The Implications of Different Acceptable Prospective Returns to Investment for Activity in the UKCS

AU - Kemp, Alexander G.

AU - Stephen, Linda

PY - 2017/9

Y1 - 2017/9

N2 - This paper examines the effects of different investment hurdle rates on capital expenditure and production relating to new oil and gas fields in the UK Continental Shelf over the period 2017-2050. Financial simulation modelling, including the Monte Carlo technique to model future fields, is employed along with a large database of discovered but undeveloped fields. The investment hurdles employed are (1) real IRR of 10%, (2) real IRR of 15%, (3) minimum NPV of £10 million, (4) NPV/I ≥ 0.3, and (5) NPV/I ≥ 0.5. The last 2 hurdles reflect significant capital rationing. At oil prices of $50 many projects fail even the least demanding hurdle. At $60 price many more projects pass the hurdles but use of the NPV/I ratios result in much lower investment and production over the period.

AB - This paper examines the effects of different investment hurdle rates on capital expenditure and production relating to new oil and gas fields in the UK Continental Shelf over the period 2017-2050. Financial simulation modelling, including the Monte Carlo technique to model future fields, is employed along with a large database of discovered but undeveloped fields. The investment hurdles employed are (1) real IRR of 10%, (2) real IRR of 15%, (3) minimum NPV of £10 million, (4) NPV/I ≥ 0.3, and (5) NPV/I ≥ 0.5. The last 2 hurdles reflect significant capital rationing. At oil prices of $50 many projects fail even the least demanding hurdle. At $60 price many more projects pass the hurdles but use of the NPV/I ratios result in much lower investment and production over the period.

KW - investment hurdles

KW - activity in the UKCS

KW - discount rates

KW - capital rationing

M3 - Working paper

VL - 141

T3 - North Sea Study Occasional Papers

SP - i - 61

BT - The Implications of Different Acceptable Prospective Returns to Investment for Activity in the UKCS

PB - University of Aberdeen

ER -