The introduction of new interventional procedures in the British National Health Service

A qualitative study

Tania Lourenco, Adrian M Grant, Jennifer M Burr, Luke Vale

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)
4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate how interventional procedures (IPs) are introduced into the British National Health Services and identify areas for improvement in the current process. METHODS: Qualitative study using one to one semi-structured interviews. Using the framework approach, the data generated from 14 participants were analysed with coding of emergent themes. Data were analysed separately for providers and commissioner organisations. RESULTS: Variations were observed in how IPs are introduced from both the provider and commissioner perspectives. Patterns of approaches allowed the development of models reflecting practice at each type of organisation: very structured in some places to, unstructured or almost non-existent in others. Factors affecting the decision to introduce a procedure include: immediate costs and benefits, numbers of people affected, training requirements, NICE guidance, nature of procedure, support from colleagues, incentives, public or policy-maker pressure, and aims of the institution. Monitoring was seen as a key area for improvement by many. CONCLUSIONS: These variations indicate that the process of introducing new IPs in the NHS can be improved. Factors affecting decision-making and problems have been identified. The results of our study could inform and help shape future processes of managing and the introduction of new procedures into the NHS.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)35-42
JournalHealth Policy
Volume100
Issue number1
Early online date21 Oct 2010
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2011

Fingerprint

State Medicine
Catchment Area (Health)
Organizations
Public Policy
Administrative Personnel
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Motivation
Decision Making
Interviews
Pressure

Cite this

The introduction of new interventional procedures in the British National Health Service : A qualitative study. / Lourenco, Tania; Grant, Adrian M; Burr, Jennifer M; Vale, Luke.

In: Health Policy, Vol. 100, No. 1, 04.2011, p. 35-42.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lourenco, Tania ; Grant, Adrian M ; Burr, Jennifer M ; Vale, Luke. / The introduction of new interventional procedures in the British National Health Service : A qualitative study. In: Health Policy. 2011 ; Vol. 100, No. 1. pp. 35-42.
@article{dc661282186941e68b913608a70bbad0,
title = "The introduction of new interventional procedures in the British National Health Service: A qualitative study",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES: To investigate how interventional procedures (IPs) are introduced into the British National Health Services and identify areas for improvement in the current process. METHODS: Qualitative study using one to one semi-structured interviews. Using the framework approach, the data generated from 14 participants were analysed with coding of emergent themes. Data were analysed separately for providers and commissioner organisations. RESULTS: Variations were observed in how IPs are introduced from both the provider and commissioner perspectives. Patterns of approaches allowed the development of models reflecting practice at each type of organisation: very structured in some places to, unstructured or almost non-existent in others. Factors affecting the decision to introduce a procedure include: immediate costs and benefits, numbers of people affected, training requirements, NICE guidance, nature of procedure, support from colleagues, incentives, public or policy-maker pressure, and aims of the institution. Monitoring was seen as a key area for improvement by many. CONCLUSIONS: These variations indicate that the process of introducing new IPs in the NHS can be improved. Factors affecting decision-making and problems have been identified. The results of our study could inform and help shape future processes of managing and the introduction of new procedures into the NHS.",
author = "Tania Lourenco and Grant, {Adrian M} and Burr, {Jennifer M} and Luke Vale",
note = "Copyright {\circledC} 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.",
year = "2011",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.08.012",
language = "English",
volume = "100",
pages = "35--42",
journal = "Health Policy",
issn = "0168-8510",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The introduction of new interventional procedures in the British National Health Service

T2 - A qualitative study

AU - Lourenco, Tania

AU - Grant, Adrian M

AU - Burr, Jennifer M

AU - Vale, Luke

N1 - Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

PY - 2011/4

Y1 - 2011/4

N2 - OBJECTIVES: To investigate how interventional procedures (IPs) are introduced into the British National Health Services and identify areas for improvement in the current process. METHODS: Qualitative study using one to one semi-structured interviews. Using the framework approach, the data generated from 14 participants were analysed with coding of emergent themes. Data were analysed separately for providers and commissioner organisations. RESULTS: Variations were observed in how IPs are introduced from both the provider and commissioner perspectives. Patterns of approaches allowed the development of models reflecting practice at each type of organisation: very structured in some places to, unstructured or almost non-existent in others. Factors affecting the decision to introduce a procedure include: immediate costs and benefits, numbers of people affected, training requirements, NICE guidance, nature of procedure, support from colleagues, incentives, public or policy-maker pressure, and aims of the institution. Monitoring was seen as a key area for improvement by many. CONCLUSIONS: These variations indicate that the process of introducing new IPs in the NHS can be improved. Factors affecting decision-making and problems have been identified. The results of our study could inform and help shape future processes of managing and the introduction of new procedures into the NHS.

AB - OBJECTIVES: To investigate how interventional procedures (IPs) are introduced into the British National Health Services and identify areas for improvement in the current process. METHODS: Qualitative study using one to one semi-structured interviews. Using the framework approach, the data generated from 14 participants were analysed with coding of emergent themes. Data were analysed separately for providers and commissioner organisations. RESULTS: Variations were observed in how IPs are introduced from both the provider and commissioner perspectives. Patterns of approaches allowed the development of models reflecting practice at each type of organisation: very structured in some places to, unstructured or almost non-existent in others. Factors affecting the decision to introduce a procedure include: immediate costs and benefits, numbers of people affected, training requirements, NICE guidance, nature of procedure, support from colleagues, incentives, public or policy-maker pressure, and aims of the institution. Monitoring was seen as a key area for improvement by many. CONCLUSIONS: These variations indicate that the process of introducing new IPs in the NHS can be improved. Factors affecting decision-making and problems have been identified. The results of our study could inform and help shape future processes of managing and the introduction of new procedures into the NHS.

U2 - 10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.08.012

DO - 10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.08.012

M3 - Article

VL - 100

SP - 35

EP - 42

JO - Health Policy

JF - Health Policy

SN - 0168-8510

IS - 1

ER -