The migration of UK trained GPs to Australia: Does risk attitude matter?

Marjon van der Pol* (Corresponding Author), Anthony Scott, Alastair Irvine

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background. Little is known about the drivers of migration of GPs. Risk attitude may play an important role as migration is fundamentally a risky decision that balances the risks of staying with the risks associated with leaving. This paper examines the association between risk attitudes and the migration of UK GPs to Australia.

Methods. GPs who qualified in the UK but work in Australia and who responded to the Medicine in Australia: Balancing Employment and Life (MABEL) national longitudinal survey of doctors, were compared with GPs based in Scotland who responded to a survey. Risk attitudes were elicited for financial risks, career and professional risks and clinical risks on a scale from 1 to 5.

Results. GPs in Scotland and UK trained GPs in Australia have similar risk attitudes for financial risk. However, UK trained GPs in Australia are less willing to take clinical and career risks.

Conclusion. GPs who migrated to Australia after qualifying in the UK were more risk averse about their career and clinical risks. This may suggest that more risk averse GPs migrate to Australia due to pull factors such as less uncertainty around career and clinical outcomes in Australia. The uncertain NHS climate may push more risk averse doctors away from the UK.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1093-1099
Number of pages7
JournalHealth Policy
Volume123
Issue number11
Early online date19 Sep 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2019

Keywords

  • migration
  • risk attitude
  • general practitioners
  • General practitioners
  • Migration
  • Risk attitude

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The migration of UK trained GPs to Australia: Does risk attitude matter?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this