The Quasi-Constitutional Right to Vote in the United Kingdom

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The concept of a constitutional right to vote is familiar to lawyers and citizens in the United States. In contrast, the United Kingdom lacks a developed constitutional doctrine of voting rights: there is relatively little case law and limited academic discourse on the subject. Constitutional law and practice have long honored the authority of electors to choose members of Parliament, but the notion that this is a justiciable constitutional right (as distinct from a general political liberty) is a relative novelty. Its basis lies in the electoral rights included in the Human Rights Act 1998, and in judicial doctrine developing those protections. This article considers this short history of voting as an actionable human right, and argues that the right remains at best a quasi-constitutional one, bearing some features of a full constitutional right to vote and lacking others. Some of those deficits may be curable within the existing legal and political regimes for its protection; others would require more radical constitutional reform.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)493-516
Number of pages24
JournalElection Law Journal
Volume13
Issue number4
Early online date8 Oct 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 10 Dec 2014

Fingerprint

right to vote
doctrine
voting
human rights
constitutional reform
constitutional law
political regime
case law
lawyer
parliament
deficit
act
citizen
discourse
lack
history

Cite this

The Quasi-Constitutional Right to Vote in the United Kingdom. / Green, Heather .

In: Election Law Journal, Vol. 13, No. 4, 10.12.2014, p. 493-516.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{63b31fff21d24ee6aff74a7717acacbe,
title = "The Quasi-Constitutional Right to Vote in the United Kingdom",
abstract = "The concept of a constitutional right to vote is familiar to lawyers and citizens in the United States. In contrast, the United Kingdom lacks a developed constitutional doctrine of voting rights: there is relatively little case law and limited academic discourse on the subject. Constitutional law and practice have long honored the authority of electors to choose members of Parliament, but the notion that this is a justiciable constitutional right (as distinct from a general political liberty) is a relative novelty. Its basis lies in the electoral rights included in the Human Rights Act 1998, and in judicial doctrine developing those protections. This article considers this short history of voting as an actionable human right, and argues that the right remains at best a quasi-constitutional one, bearing some features of a full constitutional right to vote and lacking others. Some of those deficits may be curable within the existing legal and political regimes for its protection; others would require more radical constitutional reform.",
author = "Heather Green",
year = "2014",
month = "12",
day = "10",
doi = "10.1089/elj.2013.0193",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "493--516",
journal = "Election Law Journal",
issn = "1533-1296",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Quasi-Constitutional Right to Vote in the United Kingdom

AU - Green, Heather

PY - 2014/12/10

Y1 - 2014/12/10

N2 - The concept of a constitutional right to vote is familiar to lawyers and citizens in the United States. In contrast, the United Kingdom lacks a developed constitutional doctrine of voting rights: there is relatively little case law and limited academic discourse on the subject. Constitutional law and practice have long honored the authority of electors to choose members of Parliament, but the notion that this is a justiciable constitutional right (as distinct from a general political liberty) is a relative novelty. Its basis lies in the electoral rights included in the Human Rights Act 1998, and in judicial doctrine developing those protections. This article considers this short history of voting as an actionable human right, and argues that the right remains at best a quasi-constitutional one, bearing some features of a full constitutional right to vote and lacking others. Some of those deficits may be curable within the existing legal and political regimes for its protection; others would require more radical constitutional reform.

AB - The concept of a constitutional right to vote is familiar to lawyers and citizens in the United States. In contrast, the United Kingdom lacks a developed constitutional doctrine of voting rights: there is relatively little case law and limited academic discourse on the subject. Constitutional law and practice have long honored the authority of electors to choose members of Parliament, but the notion that this is a justiciable constitutional right (as distinct from a general political liberty) is a relative novelty. Its basis lies in the electoral rights included in the Human Rights Act 1998, and in judicial doctrine developing those protections. This article considers this short history of voting as an actionable human right, and argues that the right remains at best a quasi-constitutional one, bearing some features of a full constitutional right to vote and lacking others. Some of those deficits may be curable within the existing legal and political regimes for its protection; others would require more radical constitutional reform.

U2 - 10.1089/elj.2013.0193

DO - 10.1089/elj.2013.0193

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 493

EP - 516

JO - Election Law Journal

JF - Election Law Journal

SN - 1533-1296

IS - 4

ER -