The unintended consequences of cervical screening: distress in women undergoing cytologic surveillance

Linda Sharp, Seonaidh Cotton, Margaret Cruickshank, Nicola M Gray, Kirsten Harrild, Louise Smart, Leslie G Walker, Julian Little, The TOMBOLA (Trial Of Management of Borderline and Other Low-grade Abnormal smears) Group

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: It is well known that receipt of an initial abnormal cervical cytology test can trigger considerable anxiety among women. Less is known about the impact of follow-up by repeat cytology tests. We quantified prevalence, and identified predictors, of distress after repeat cytologic testing in women with a single low-grade test.

METHODS: Within the framework of the TOMBOLA randomized controlled trial of alternative managements, 844 women aged 20 to 59 years with a single routine cytology test showing borderline nuclear abnormalities (BNA; broadly equivalent to atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance) were assigned to follow-up by repeat cytology in primary care (the first test was due 6 months after the initial BNA result). Women completed sociodemographic and psychosocial questionnaires at recruitment and the Impact of Event Scale (IES) 6 weeks after their first follow-up cytology test. Factors associated with significant psychologic distress (IES ≥ 9) were identified using logistic regression.

RESULTS: The response rate was 74% (n = 621/844). Of all the respondents, 39% scored in the range for significant distress. Distress varied by follow-up cytology result: negative, 36%; BNA or mild dyskaryosis, 42%; other (including high grade and inadequate), 55%. After adjusting for the cytology result, risk of distress was significantly raised in women who had significant anxiety at recruitment, reported experiencing pain after the follow-up cytology, had children, or were dissatisfied with support they had received after their initial BNA test.

CONCLUSIONS: Substantial proportions of women experience surveillance-related psychologic distress after a follow-up cytology test, even when the result is negative. This is an important, albeit unintended, consequence of cervical screening. Strategies to alleviate this distress merit attention.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)142-150
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Lower Genital Tract Disease
Volume18
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2014

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The unintended consequences of cervical screening: distress in women undergoing cytologic surveillance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Sharp, L., Cotton, S., Cruickshank, M., Gray, N. M., Harrild, K., Smart, L., Walker, L. G., Little, J., & The TOMBOLA (Trial Of Management of Borderline and Other Low-grade Abnormal smears) Group (2014). The unintended consequences of cervical screening: distress in women undergoing cytologic surveillance. Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease, 18(2), 142-150. https://doi.org/10.1097/LGT.0b013e31829c97d8