The use of multiple respiratory inhalers requiring different inhalation techniques has an adverse effect on COPD outcomes

Sinthia Bosnic-Anticevich, Henry Chrystyn, Richard W Costello, Myrna B Dolovich, Monica J Fletcher, Federico Lavorini, Roberto Rodriguez-Roisin, Dermot Ryan, Simon Wan Yau Ming, David B Price

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

36 Citations (Scopus)
4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Patients with COPD may be prescribed multiple inhalers as part of their treatment regimen, which require different inhalation techniques. Previous literature has shown that the effectiveness of inhaled treatment can be adversely affected by incorrect inhaler technique. Prescribing a range of device types could worsen this problem, leading to poorer outcomes in COPD patients, but the impact is not yet known.
Aims: To compare clinical outcomes of COPD patients who use devices requiring similar inhalation technique with those who use devices with mixed techniques.
Methods: A matched cohort design was used, with 2 years of data from the Optimum Patient Care Research Database. Matching variables were established from a baseline year of follow-up data, and two cohorts were formed: a “similar-devices cohort” and a “mixed-devices cohort”. COPD-related events were recorded during an outcome year of follow-up. The primary outcome measure was an incidence rate ratio (IRR) comparing the rate of exacerbations between study cohorts. A secondary outcome compared average daily use of short-acting beta agonist (SABA).
Results: The final study sample contained 8,225 patients in each cohort (mean age 67 [SD, 10], 57% males, 37% current smokers). Patients in the similar-devices cohort had a lower rate of exacerbations compared with those in the mixed-devices cohort (adjusted IRR 0.82, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.80–0.84) and were less likely to be in a higher-dose SABA group (adjusted proportional odds ratio 0.54, 95% CI 0.51–0.57).
Conclusion: COPD patients who were prescribed one or more additional inhaler devices requiring similar inhalation techniques to their previous device(s) showed better outcomes than those who were prescribed devices requiring different techniques.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)59-71
Number of pages13
JournalInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Volume12
Early online date21 Dec 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Fingerprint

Nebulizers and Vaporizers
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Inhalation
Equipment and Supplies
Confidence Intervals
Incidence
Patient Care
Cohort Studies
Odds Ratio
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Databases

Keywords

  • chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
  • inhalation technique
  • exacerbations
  • inhaler devices
  • observational
  • matched cohort

Cite this

The use of multiple respiratory inhalers requiring different inhalation techniques has an adverse effect on COPD outcomes. / Bosnic-Anticevich, Sinthia; Chrystyn, Henry; Costello, Richard W ; Dolovich, Myrna B ; Fletcher, Monica J ; Lavorini, Federico; Rodriguez-Roisin, Roberto; Ryan, Dermot; Ming, Simon Wan Yau ; Price, David B.

In: International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease , Vol. 12, 2017, p. 59-71.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bosnic-Anticevich, S, Chrystyn, H, Costello, RW, Dolovich, MB, Fletcher, MJ, Lavorini, F, Rodriguez-Roisin, R, Ryan, D, Ming, SWY & Price, DB 2017, 'The use of multiple respiratory inhalers requiring different inhalation techniques has an adverse effect on COPD outcomes', International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease , vol. 12, pp. 59-71. https://doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S117196
Bosnic-Anticevich, Sinthia ; Chrystyn, Henry ; Costello, Richard W ; Dolovich, Myrna B ; Fletcher, Monica J ; Lavorini, Federico ; Rodriguez-Roisin, Roberto ; Ryan, Dermot ; Ming, Simon Wan Yau ; Price, David B. / The use of multiple respiratory inhalers requiring different inhalation techniques has an adverse effect on COPD outcomes. In: International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease . 2017 ; Vol. 12. pp. 59-71.
@article{d1ec876b72da43ecadfc184326d922cf,
title = "The use of multiple respiratory inhalers requiring different inhalation techniques has an adverse effect on COPD outcomes",
abstract = "Background: Patients with COPD may be prescribed multiple inhalers as part of their treatment regimen, which require different inhalation techniques. Previous literature has shown that the effectiveness of inhaled treatment can be adversely affected by incorrect inhaler technique. Prescribing a range of device types could worsen this problem, leading to poorer outcomes in COPD patients, but the impact is not yet known.Aims: To compare clinical outcomes of COPD patients who use devices requiring similar inhalation technique with those who use devices with mixed techniques.Methods: A matched cohort design was used, with 2 years of data from the Optimum Patient Care Research Database. Matching variables were established from a baseline year of follow-up data, and two cohorts were formed: a “similar-devices cohort” and a “mixed-devices cohort”. COPD-related events were recorded during an outcome year of follow-up. The primary outcome measure was an incidence rate ratio (IRR) comparing the rate of exacerbations between study cohorts. A secondary outcome compared average daily use of short-acting beta agonist (SABA).Results: The final study sample contained 8,225 patients in each cohort (mean age 67 [SD, 10], 57{\%} males, 37{\%} current smokers). Patients in the similar-devices cohort had a lower rate of exacerbations compared with those in the mixed-devices cohort (adjusted IRR 0.82, 95{\%} confidence interval [CI] 0.80–0.84) and were less likely to be in a higher-dose SABA group (adjusted proportional odds ratio 0.54, 95{\%} CI 0.51–0.57).Conclusion: COPD patients who were prescribed one or more additional inhaler devices requiring similar inhalation techniques to their previous device(s) showed better outcomes than those who were prescribed devices requiring different techniques.",
keywords = "chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, inhalation technique, exacerbations, inhaler devices, observational , matched cohort",
author = "Sinthia Bosnic-Anticevich and Henry Chrystyn and Costello, {Richard W} and Dolovich, {Myrna B} and Fletcher, {Monica J} and Federico Lavorini and Roberto Rodriguez-Roisin and Dermot Ryan and Ming, {Simon Wan Yau} and Price, {David B}",
note = "This study was funded by Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. The authors would like to thank Lisa Law and Simon van Rysewyck for medical writing and Arjun Jain for statistical analysis. Many thanks to Derek Skinner for preparation of data for analysis.",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.2147/COPD.S117196",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "59--71",
journal = "International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease",
issn = "1176-9106",
publisher = "Dove Medical Press Ltd.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The use of multiple respiratory inhalers requiring different inhalation techniques has an adverse effect on COPD outcomes

AU - Bosnic-Anticevich, Sinthia

AU - Chrystyn, Henry

AU - Costello, Richard W

AU - Dolovich, Myrna B

AU - Fletcher, Monica J

AU - Lavorini, Federico

AU - Rodriguez-Roisin, Roberto

AU - Ryan, Dermot

AU - Ming, Simon Wan Yau

AU - Price, David B

N1 - This study was funded by Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. The authors would like to thank Lisa Law and Simon van Rysewyck for medical writing and Arjun Jain for statistical analysis. Many thanks to Derek Skinner for preparation of data for analysis.

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Background: Patients with COPD may be prescribed multiple inhalers as part of their treatment regimen, which require different inhalation techniques. Previous literature has shown that the effectiveness of inhaled treatment can be adversely affected by incorrect inhaler technique. Prescribing a range of device types could worsen this problem, leading to poorer outcomes in COPD patients, but the impact is not yet known.Aims: To compare clinical outcomes of COPD patients who use devices requiring similar inhalation technique with those who use devices with mixed techniques.Methods: A matched cohort design was used, with 2 years of data from the Optimum Patient Care Research Database. Matching variables were established from a baseline year of follow-up data, and two cohorts were formed: a “similar-devices cohort” and a “mixed-devices cohort”. COPD-related events were recorded during an outcome year of follow-up. The primary outcome measure was an incidence rate ratio (IRR) comparing the rate of exacerbations between study cohorts. A secondary outcome compared average daily use of short-acting beta agonist (SABA).Results: The final study sample contained 8,225 patients in each cohort (mean age 67 [SD, 10], 57% males, 37% current smokers). Patients in the similar-devices cohort had a lower rate of exacerbations compared with those in the mixed-devices cohort (adjusted IRR 0.82, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.80–0.84) and were less likely to be in a higher-dose SABA group (adjusted proportional odds ratio 0.54, 95% CI 0.51–0.57).Conclusion: COPD patients who were prescribed one or more additional inhaler devices requiring similar inhalation techniques to their previous device(s) showed better outcomes than those who were prescribed devices requiring different techniques.

AB - Background: Patients with COPD may be prescribed multiple inhalers as part of their treatment regimen, which require different inhalation techniques. Previous literature has shown that the effectiveness of inhaled treatment can be adversely affected by incorrect inhaler technique. Prescribing a range of device types could worsen this problem, leading to poorer outcomes in COPD patients, but the impact is not yet known.Aims: To compare clinical outcomes of COPD patients who use devices requiring similar inhalation technique with those who use devices with mixed techniques.Methods: A matched cohort design was used, with 2 years of data from the Optimum Patient Care Research Database. Matching variables were established from a baseline year of follow-up data, and two cohorts were formed: a “similar-devices cohort” and a “mixed-devices cohort”. COPD-related events were recorded during an outcome year of follow-up. The primary outcome measure was an incidence rate ratio (IRR) comparing the rate of exacerbations between study cohorts. A secondary outcome compared average daily use of short-acting beta agonist (SABA).Results: The final study sample contained 8,225 patients in each cohort (mean age 67 [SD, 10], 57% males, 37% current smokers). Patients in the similar-devices cohort had a lower rate of exacerbations compared with those in the mixed-devices cohort (adjusted IRR 0.82, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.80–0.84) and were less likely to be in a higher-dose SABA group (adjusted proportional odds ratio 0.54, 95% CI 0.51–0.57).Conclusion: COPD patients who were prescribed one or more additional inhaler devices requiring similar inhalation techniques to their previous device(s) showed better outcomes than those who were prescribed devices requiring different techniques.

KW - chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

KW - inhalation technique

KW - exacerbations

KW - inhaler devices

KW - observational

KW - matched cohort

U2 - 10.2147/COPD.S117196

DO - 10.2147/COPD.S117196

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 59

EP - 71

JO - International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

JF - International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

SN - 1176-9106

ER -