The views of health care professionals about selective decontamination of the digestive tract

An international, theoretically informed interview study

Eilidh M. Duncan, Brian H. Cuthbertson, Maria E. Prior, Andrea P Marshall, Elisabeth C Wells, Laura E Todd, Denise Bolsover, Rumana S Newlands, Fiona Webster, Louise Rose, Marion K Campbell, Geoff Bellingan, Ian M Seppelt, Jill J Francis, SuDDICU International Study Group

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)
8 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

PURPOSE: Selective decontamination of the digestive tract (SDD) as a prophylactic intervention improves hospital-acquired infection and survival rates. Uptake of SDD is low and remains controversial. This study applied the theoretical domains framework to assess intensive care unit clinicians' views about SDD in regions with limited or no adoption of SDD.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Participants were health professionals with "decisional authority" for the adoption of SDD. Semistructured interviews were conducted as the first round of a Delphi study. Views about SDD adoption, delivery, and further SDD research were explored. Directed content analysis of interview data identified subthemes, which informed item development for subsequent Delphi rounds. Linguistic features of interview data were also explored.

RESULTS: One hundred forty-one participants provided interview data. Fifty-six subthemes were identified; 46 were common across regions. Beliefs about consequences were the most widely elaborated theme. Linguistic features of how participants discussed SDD included caution expressed when discussing the risks and benefits and words such as "worry," "anxiety," and "fear" when discussing potential antibiotic resistance associated with SDD.

CONCLUSIONS: We identified salient beliefs, barriers, and facilitators to SDD adoption and delivery. What participants said about SDD and the way in which they said it demonstrated the degree of clinical caution, uncertainty, and concern that SDD evokes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)634-640
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Critical Care
Volume29
Issue number4
Early online date21 Mar 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2014

Fingerprint

Decontamination
Gastrointestinal Tract
Interviews
Delivery of Health Care
Linguistics
Delphi Technique
Microbial Drug Resistance
Cross Infection
Uncertainty
Fear
Intensive Care Units
Theoretical Models
Survival Rate
Anxiety

Keywords

  • antibiotic prophylaxis
  • theoretical domains framework
  • intensive care unit
  • qualitative research

Cite this

The views of health care professionals about selective decontamination of the digestive tract : An international, theoretically informed interview study. / Duncan, Eilidh M.; Cuthbertson, Brian H.; Prior, Maria E.; Marshall, Andrea P; Wells, Elisabeth C; Todd, Laura E; Bolsover, Denise; Newlands, Rumana S; Webster, Fiona; Rose, Louise; Campbell, Marion K; Bellingan, Geoff; Seppelt, Ian M; Francis, Jill J; SuDDICU International Study Group.

In: Journal of Critical Care, Vol. 29, No. 4, 08.2014, p. 634-640.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Duncan, EM, Cuthbertson, BH, Prior, ME, Marshall, AP, Wells, EC, Todd, LE, Bolsover, D, Newlands, RS, Webster, F, Rose, L, Campbell, MK, Bellingan, G, Seppelt, IM, Francis, JJ & SuDDICU International Study Group 2014, 'The views of health care professionals about selective decontamination of the digestive tract: An international, theoretically informed interview study', Journal of Critical Care, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 634-640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.03.013
Duncan, Eilidh M. ; Cuthbertson, Brian H. ; Prior, Maria E. ; Marshall, Andrea P ; Wells, Elisabeth C ; Todd, Laura E ; Bolsover, Denise ; Newlands, Rumana S ; Webster, Fiona ; Rose, Louise ; Campbell, Marion K ; Bellingan, Geoff ; Seppelt, Ian M ; Francis, Jill J ; SuDDICU International Study Group. / The views of health care professionals about selective decontamination of the digestive tract : An international, theoretically informed interview study. In: Journal of Critical Care. 2014 ; Vol. 29, No. 4. pp. 634-640.
@article{fad5166844c045bba8a3a979abd86ec3,
title = "The views of health care professionals about selective decontamination of the digestive tract: An international, theoretically informed interview study",
abstract = "PURPOSE: Selective decontamination of the digestive tract (SDD) as a prophylactic intervention improves hospital-acquired infection and survival rates. Uptake of SDD is low and remains controversial. This study applied the theoretical domains framework to assess intensive care unit clinicians' views about SDD in regions with limited or no adoption of SDD.MATERIALS AND METHODS: Participants were health professionals with {"}decisional authority{"} for the adoption of SDD. Semistructured interviews were conducted as the first round of a Delphi study. Views about SDD adoption, delivery, and further SDD research were explored. Directed content analysis of interview data identified subthemes, which informed item development for subsequent Delphi rounds. Linguistic features of interview data were also explored.RESULTS: One hundred forty-one participants provided interview data. Fifty-six subthemes were identified; 46 were common across regions. Beliefs about consequences were the most widely elaborated theme. Linguistic features of how participants discussed SDD included caution expressed when discussing the risks and benefits and words such as {"}worry,{"} {"}anxiety,{"} and {"}fear{"} when discussing potential antibiotic resistance associated with SDD.CONCLUSIONS: We identified salient beliefs, barriers, and facilitators to SDD adoption and delivery. What participants said about SDD and the way in which they said it demonstrated the degree of clinical caution, uncertainty, and concern that SDD evokes.",
keywords = "antibiotic prophylaxis, theoretical domains framework, intensive care unit, qualitative research",
author = "Duncan, {Eilidh M.} and Cuthbertson, {Brian H.} and Prior, {Maria E.} and Marshall, {Andrea P} and Wells, {Elisabeth C} and Todd, {Laura E} and Denise Bolsover and Newlands, {Rumana S} and Fiona Webster and Louise Rose and Campbell, {Marion K} and Geoff Bellingan and Seppelt, {Ian M} and Francis, {Jill J} and {SuDDICU International Study Group}",
note = "Copyright {\circledC} 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.",
year = "2014",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.03.013",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "634--640",
journal = "Journal of Critical Care",
issn = "0883-9441",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The views of health care professionals about selective decontamination of the digestive tract

T2 - An international, theoretically informed interview study

AU - Duncan, Eilidh M.

AU - Cuthbertson, Brian H.

AU - Prior, Maria E.

AU - Marshall, Andrea P

AU - Wells, Elisabeth C

AU - Todd, Laura E

AU - Bolsover, Denise

AU - Newlands, Rumana S

AU - Webster, Fiona

AU - Rose, Louise

AU - Campbell, Marion K

AU - Bellingan, Geoff

AU - Seppelt, Ian M

AU - Francis, Jill J

AU - SuDDICU International Study Group

N1 - Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

PY - 2014/8

Y1 - 2014/8

N2 - PURPOSE: Selective decontamination of the digestive tract (SDD) as a prophylactic intervention improves hospital-acquired infection and survival rates. Uptake of SDD is low and remains controversial. This study applied the theoretical domains framework to assess intensive care unit clinicians' views about SDD in regions with limited or no adoption of SDD.MATERIALS AND METHODS: Participants were health professionals with "decisional authority" for the adoption of SDD. Semistructured interviews were conducted as the first round of a Delphi study. Views about SDD adoption, delivery, and further SDD research were explored. Directed content analysis of interview data identified subthemes, which informed item development for subsequent Delphi rounds. Linguistic features of interview data were also explored.RESULTS: One hundred forty-one participants provided interview data. Fifty-six subthemes were identified; 46 were common across regions. Beliefs about consequences were the most widely elaborated theme. Linguistic features of how participants discussed SDD included caution expressed when discussing the risks and benefits and words such as "worry," "anxiety," and "fear" when discussing potential antibiotic resistance associated with SDD.CONCLUSIONS: We identified salient beliefs, barriers, and facilitators to SDD adoption and delivery. What participants said about SDD and the way in which they said it demonstrated the degree of clinical caution, uncertainty, and concern that SDD evokes.

AB - PURPOSE: Selective decontamination of the digestive tract (SDD) as a prophylactic intervention improves hospital-acquired infection and survival rates. Uptake of SDD is low and remains controversial. This study applied the theoretical domains framework to assess intensive care unit clinicians' views about SDD in regions with limited or no adoption of SDD.MATERIALS AND METHODS: Participants were health professionals with "decisional authority" for the adoption of SDD. Semistructured interviews were conducted as the first round of a Delphi study. Views about SDD adoption, delivery, and further SDD research were explored. Directed content analysis of interview data identified subthemes, which informed item development for subsequent Delphi rounds. Linguistic features of interview data were also explored.RESULTS: One hundred forty-one participants provided interview data. Fifty-six subthemes were identified; 46 were common across regions. Beliefs about consequences were the most widely elaborated theme. Linguistic features of how participants discussed SDD included caution expressed when discussing the risks and benefits and words such as "worry," "anxiety," and "fear" when discussing potential antibiotic resistance associated with SDD.CONCLUSIONS: We identified salient beliefs, barriers, and facilitators to SDD adoption and delivery. What participants said about SDD and the way in which they said it demonstrated the degree of clinical caution, uncertainty, and concern that SDD evokes.

KW - antibiotic prophylaxis

KW - theoretical domains framework

KW - intensive care unit

KW - qualitative research

U2 - 10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.03.013

DO - 10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.03.013

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 634

EP - 640

JO - Journal of Critical Care

JF - Journal of Critical Care

SN - 0883-9441

IS - 4

ER -