Traumatic brain injury and prospective memory: Influence of task complexity

Julie Diane Henry, Louise Helen Phillips, John Robertson Crawford, Matthias Kliegel, Georgia Theodorou, Fiona Summers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

36 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A quantitative review indicated that prospective memory impairment is a consistent feature of traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, evidence also suggests that manipulations that increase demands on controlled attentional processes moderate the magnitude of observed deficits. A total of 16 TBI participants were compared with 15 matched controls on a task in which the number of prospective target events was manipulated. This manipulation was of interest because two competing models make different predictions as to its effect on controlled attentional processes. In the context of Smith and Bayen's (2004) preparatory attentional processes and memory processes (PAM) model increasing the number of target events should increase requirements for controlled attentional processing. In contrast, McDaniel and Einstein's (2000) multiprocess framework assumes that distinct target events presented in focal awareness of the processing activities required for the ongoing task are likely to depend on automatic processes. This latter model therefore leads to the prediction that increasing the number of target events should not increase demands upon controlled attentional processes. Consistent with McDaniel and Einstein's (2000) multiprocess framework, TBI patients were significantly and comparably impaired on the one- and the four-target-event conditions relative to controls. Further, TBI deficits could not be attributed to increased difficulty with the retrospective component of the prospective memory task. The practical and theoretical implications of these results are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)457-466
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology
Volume29
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2007

Keywords

  • verbal fluency performance
  • closed-head injury
  • event
  • intentions
  • retrieval
  • deficits
  • cue
  • age

Cite this

Traumatic brain injury and prospective memory : Influence of task complexity. / Henry, Julie Diane; Phillips, Louise Helen; Crawford, John Robertson; Kliegel, Matthias; Theodorou, Georgia; Summers, Fiona.

In: Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, Vol. 29, No. 5, 07.2007, p. 457-466.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Henry, Julie Diane ; Phillips, Louise Helen ; Crawford, John Robertson ; Kliegel, Matthias ; Theodorou, Georgia ; Summers, Fiona. / Traumatic brain injury and prospective memory : Influence of task complexity. In: Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology. 2007 ; Vol. 29, No. 5. pp. 457-466.
@article{652e709e0be149b18c886cd560794902,
title = "Traumatic brain injury and prospective memory: Influence of task complexity",
abstract = "A quantitative review indicated that prospective memory impairment is a consistent feature of traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, evidence also suggests that manipulations that increase demands on controlled attentional processes moderate the magnitude of observed deficits. A total of 16 TBI participants were compared with 15 matched controls on a task in which the number of prospective target events was manipulated. This manipulation was of interest because two competing models make different predictions as to its effect on controlled attentional processes. In the context of Smith and Bayen's (2004) preparatory attentional processes and memory processes (PAM) model increasing the number of target events should increase requirements for controlled attentional processing. In contrast, McDaniel and Einstein's (2000) multiprocess framework assumes that distinct target events presented in focal awareness of the processing activities required for the ongoing task are likely to depend on automatic processes. This latter model therefore leads to the prediction that increasing the number of target events should not increase demands upon controlled attentional processes. Consistent with McDaniel and Einstein's (2000) multiprocess framework, TBI patients were significantly and comparably impaired on the one- and the four-target-event conditions relative to controls. Further, TBI deficits could not be attributed to increased difficulty with the retrospective component of the prospective memory task. The practical and theoretical implications of these results are discussed.",
keywords = "verbal fluency performance, closed-head injury, event, intentions, retrieval, deficits, cue, age",
author = "Henry, {Julie Diane} and Phillips, {Louise Helen} and Crawford, {John Robertson} and Matthias Kliegel and Georgia Theodorou and Fiona Summers",
year = "2007",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1080/13803390600762717",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "457--466",
journal = "Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology",
issn = "0168-8634",
publisher = "Psychology Press Ltd",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Traumatic brain injury and prospective memory

T2 - Influence of task complexity

AU - Henry, Julie Diane

AU - Phillips, Louise Helen

AU - Crawford, John Robertson

AU - Kliegel, Matthias

AU - Theodorou, Georgia

AU - Summers, Fiona

PY - 2007/7

Y1 - 2007/7

N2 - A quantitative review indicated that prospective memory impairment is a consistent feature of traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, evidence also suggests that manipulations that increase demands on controlled attentional processes moderate the magnitude of observed deficits. A total of 16 TBI participants were compared with 15 matched controls on a task in which the number of prospective target events was manipulated. This manipulation was of interest because two competing models make different predictions as to its effect on controlled attentional processes. In the context of Smith and Bayen's (2004) preparatory attentional processes and memory processes (PAM) model increasing the number of target events should increase requirements for controlled attentional processing. In contrast, McDaniel and Einstein's (2000) multiprocess framework assumes that distinct target events presented in focal awareness of the processing activities required for the ongoing task are likely to depend on automatic processes. This latter model therefore leads to the prediction that increasing the number of target events should not increase demands upon controlled attentional processes. Consistent with McDaniel and Einstein's (2000) multiprocess framework, TBI patients were significantly and comparably impaired on the one- and the four-target-event conditions relative to controls. Further, TBI deficits could not be attributed to increased difficulty with the retrospective component of the prospective memory task. The practical and theoretical implications of these results are discussed.

AB - A quantitative review indicated that prospective memory impairment is a consistent feature of traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, evidence also suggests that manipulations that increase demands on controlled attentional processes moderate the magnitude of observed deficits. A total of 16 TBI participants were compared with 15 matched controls on a task in which the number of prospective target events was manipulated. This manipulation was of interest because two competing models make different predictions as to its effect on controlled attentional processes. In the context of Smith and Bayen's (2004) preparatory attentional processes and memory processes (PAM) model increasing the number of target events should increase requirements for controlled attentional processing. In contrast, McDaniel and Einstein's (2000) multiprocess framework assumes that distinct target events presented in focal awareness of the processing activities required for the ongoing task are likely to depend on automatic processes. This latter model therefore leads to the prediction that increasing the number of target events should not increase demands upon controlled attentional processes. Consistent with McDaniel and Einstein's (2000) multiprocess framework, TBI patients were significantly and comparably impaired on the one- and the four-target-event conditions relative to controls. Further, TBI deficits could not be attributed to increased difficulty with the retrospective component of the prospective memory task. The practical and theoretical implications of these results are discussed.

KW - verbal fluency performance

KW - closed-head injury

KW - event

KW - intentions

KW - retrieval

KW - deficits

KW - cue

KW - age

U2 - 10.1080/13803390600762717

DO - 10.1080/13803390600762717

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 457

EP - 466

JO - Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology

JF - Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology

SN - 0168-8634

IS - 5

ER -