Trouble on the horizon? Addressing place-based values in planning for offshore wind energy

Olivia Woolley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The values held by people in respect of the places that they live in, work in or enjoy, influence the way in which they react to proposals for offshore wind farms that would be visible from coastlines. However, provision for public participation in the Planning Act 2008, under which large offshore wind farms are to be regulated, is inadequate for identifying whether such development would be seen as problematic by those whom it would affect. In this article, I argue that deliberative participation in local and regional plan-making would provide a better means of exploring how offshore infrastructure and popularly held values in places and seascapes might interact, and thereby for determining the extent to which wind farms would be publicly acceptable in coastal waters. It would also reduce the scope for delay to planning from public opposition to which the Government attributes its difficulties with advancing its policies for terrestrial renewable energy generation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)223-250
Number of pages28
JournalJournal of Environmental Law
Volume22
Issue number2
Early online date16 Jun 2010
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Fingerprint

wind energy
wind farm
farm
planning
energy
Values
participation
renewable energy
coastal water
opposition
act
infrastructure
water
coast

Keywords

  • planning act 2008
  • offshore wind energy
  • value conflict
  • public participation
  • consultation
  • deliberation

Cite this

Trouble on the horizon? Addressing place-based values in planning for offshore wind energy. / Woolley, Olivia.

In: Journal of Environmental Law, Vol. 22, No. 2, 2010, p. 223-250.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b3884bd054ab4e9ab429dc5addb91d66,
title = "Trouble on the horizon?: Addressing place-based values in planning for offshore wind energy",
abstract = "The values held by people in respect of the places that they live in, work in or enjoy, influence the way in which they react to proposals for offshore wind farms that would be visible from coastlines. However, provision for public participation in the Planning Act 2008, under which large offshore wind farms are to be regulated, is inadequate for identifying whether such development would be seen as problematic by those whom it would affect. In this article, I argue that deliberative participation in local and regional plan-making would provide a better means of exploring how offshore infrastructure and popularly held values in places and seascapes might interact, and thereby for determining the extent to which wind farms would be publicly acceptable in coastal waters. It would also reduce the scope for delay to planning from public opposition to which the Government attributes its difficulties with advancing its policies for terrestrial renewable energy generation.",
keywords = "planning act 2008, offshore wind energy, value conflict, public participation, consultation, deliberation",
author = "Olivia Woolley",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1093/jel/eqq009",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "223--250",
journal = "Journal of Environmental Law",
issn = "0952-8873",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Trouble on the horizon?

T2 - Addressing place-based values in planning for offshore wind energy

AU - Woolley, Olivia

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - The values held by people in respect of the places that they live in, work in or enjoy, influence the way in which they react to proposals for offshore wind farms that would be visible from coastlines. However, provision for public participation in the Planning Act 2008, under which large offshore wind farms are to be regulated, is inadequate for identifying whether such development would be seen as problematic by those whom it would affect. In this article, I argue that deliberative participation in local and regional plan-making would provide a better means of exploring how offshore infrastructure and popularly held values in places and seascapes might interact, and thereby for determining the extent to which wind farms would be publicly acceptable in coastal waters. It would also reduce the scope for delay to planning from public opposition to which the Government attributes its difficulties with advancing its policies for terrestrial renewable energy generation.

AB - The values held by people in respect of the places that they live in, work in or enjoy, influence the way in which they react to proposals for offshore wind farms that would be visible from coastlines. However, provision for public participation in the Planning Act 2008, under which large offshore wind farms are to be regulated, is inadequate for identifying whether such development would be seen as problematic by those whom it would affect. In this article, I argue that deliberative participation in local and regional plan-making would provide a better means of exploring how offshore infrastructure and popularly held values in places and seascapes might interact, and thereby for determining the extent to which wind farms would be publicly acceptable in coastal waters. It would also reduce the scope for delay to planning from public opposition to which the Government attributes its difficulties with advancing its policies for terrestrial renewable energy generation.

KW - planning act 2008

KW - offshore wind energy

KW - value conflict

KW - public participation

KW - consultation

KW - deliberation

U2 - 10.1093/jel/eqq009

DO - 10.1093/jel/eqq009

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 223

EP - 250

JO - Journal of Environmental Law

JF - Journal of Environmental Law

SN - 0952-8873

IS - 2

ER -