Trust in Post-Soviet Countries, Ten Years On

Roger Sapsford, Pamela Ann Abbott, Christian Haerpfer, Claire Wallace

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)
1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper looks at recovery from the normative collapse which followed the fall of the Soviet Union; two large-scale surveys allow comparison of levels of trust in 2001 and 2010/2011. The collapse of the Soviet Union was not just an economic event; it destroyed the normative framework and drove people back to reliance on things they could see and people they knew. The main findings are that even 20 years of building new institutions has not restored trust. Countries differ: Moldova, Kyrgyzstan and Ukraine have the least trust and the least faith in the future, and Kazakhstan has the highest, followed by Russia and Armenia. There is a relationship with economic recovery and also with sociopolitical factors, but, for the most part, the results reflect the failure of a range of autocratic and authoritarian regimes to establish social cohesion.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)523-539
Number of pages17
JournalEuropean Politics and Society
Volume16
Issue number4
Early online date13 May 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

USSR
Moldova
Kyrgyzstan
Armenia
new building
Kazakhstan
social cohesion
Ukraine
faith
economics
Russia
regime
event

Keywords

  • trust
  • transition
  • social quality
  • political regime
  • sustainable development
  • human rights

Cite this

Trust in Post-Soviet Countries, Ten Years On. / Sapsford, Roger; Abbott, Pamela Ann; Haerpfer, Christian; Wallace, Claire.

In: European Politics and Society, Vol. 16, No. 4, 2015, p. 523-539.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sapsford, Roger ; Abbott, Pamela Ann ; Haerpfer, Christian ; Wallace, Claire. / Trust in Post-Soviet Countries, Ten Years On. In: European Politics and Society. 2015 ; Vol. 16, No. 4. pp. 523-539.
@article{09c59b11f7c64c19900f1d69fe1cea21,
title = "Trust in Post-Soviet Countries, Ten Years On",
abstract = "This paper looks at recovery from the normative collapse which followed the fall of the Soviet Union; two large-scale surveys allow comparison of levels of trust in 2001 and 2010/2011. The collapse of the Soviet Union was not just an economic event; it destroyed the normative framework and drove people back to reliance on things they could see and people they knew. The main findings are that even 20 years of building new institutions has not restored trust. Countries differ: Moldova, Kyrgyzstan and Ukraine have the least trust and the least faith in the future, and Kazakhstan has the highest, followed by Russia and Armenia. There is a relationship with economic recovery and also with sociopolitical factors, but, for the most part, the results reflect the failure of a range of autocratic and authoritarian regimes to establish social cohesion.",
keywords = "trust, transition, social quality, political regime, sustainable development, human rights",
author = "Roger Sapsford and Abbott, {Pamela Ann} and Christian Haerpfer and Claire Wallace",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1080/23745118.2015.1039286",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "523--539",
journal = "European Politics and Society",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Trust in Post-Soviet Countries, Ten Years On

AU - Sapsford, Roger

AU - Abbott, Pamela Ann

AU - Haerpfer, Christian

AU - Wallace, Claire

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - This paper looks at recovery from the normative collapse which followed the fall of the Soviet Union; two large-scale surveys allow comparison of levels of trust in 2001 and 2010/2011. The collapse of the Soviet Union was not just an economic event; it destroyed the normative framework and drove people back to reliance on things they could see and people they knew. The main findings are that even 20 years of building new institutions has not restored trust. Countries differ: Moldova, Kyrgyzstan and Ukraine have the least trust and the least faith in the future, and Kazakhstan has the highest, followed by Russia and Armenia. There is a relationship with economic recovery and also with sociopolitical factors, but, for the most part, the results reflect the failure of a range of autocratic and authoritarian regimes to establish social cohesion.

AB - This paper looks at recovery from the normative collapse which followed the fall of the Soviet Union; two large-scale surveys allow comparison of levels of trust in 2001 and 2010/2011. The collapse of the Soviet Union was not just an economic event; it destroyed the normative framework and drove people back to reliance on things they could see and people they knew. The main findings are that even 20 years of building new institutions has not restored trust. Countries differ: Moldova, Kyrgyzstan and Ukraine have the least trust and the least faith in the future, and Kazakhstan has the highest, followed by Russia and Armenia. There is a relationship with economic recovery and also with sociopolitical factors, but, for the most part, the results reflect the failure of a range of autocratic and authoritarian regimes to establish social cohesion.

KW - trust

KW - transition

KW - social quality

KW - political regime

KW - sustainable development

KW - human rights

U2 - 10.1080/23745118.2015.1039286

DO - 10.1080/23745118.2015.1039286

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 523

EP - 539

JO - European Politics and Society

JF - European Politics and Society

IS - 4

ER -