Uncertainty and framing in a valuation task

Stephane Luchini, Verity Watson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Many stated preference studies report framing effects in responses to valuation questions. Framing in stated preference studies occurs when respondents use irrelevant information contained in the question to help them value the good. This may occur because respondents are uncertain or do not hold well-formed preferences for the good in question. We investigate if respondent certainty explains framing effects in a contingent valuation study, using data from a double bounded dichotomous elicitation format and a follow-up certainty question. We investigate if respondent certainty influences anchoring and the shift effect. We find evidence that the anchoring effect is stronger for respondents who are less certain about their response to the contingent valuation question compared to respondents who are very certain. However, the shift effect is significant and negative only for respondents who are very certain. Our results indicate that certain respondents are more consistent with the predictions of rational behaviour than uncertain respondents.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)204-214
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Economic Psychology
Volume39
Early online date22 Aug 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2013

Fingerprint

Uncertainty
uncertainty
Surveys and Questionnaires
Framing effects
Stated preference
Contingent valuation
evidence
Values
Anchoring effect
Prediction
Rational behavior
Anchoring

Keywords

  • framing effects
  • certainty
  • contingent valuation

Cite this

Uncertainty and framing in a valuation task. / Luchini, Stephane; Watson, Verity.

In: Journal of Economic Psychology, Vol. 39, 12.2013, p. 204-214.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{149d47110d454517b2913443ed5341ff,
title = "Uncertainty and framing in a valuation task",
abstract = "Many stated preference studies report framing effects in responses to valuation questions. Framing in stated preference studies occurs when respondents use irrelevant information contained in the question to help them value the good. This may occur because respondents are uncertain or do not hold well-formed preferences for the good in question. We investigate if respondent certainty explains framing effects in a contingent valuation study, using data from a double bounded dichotomous elicitation format and a follow-up certainty question. We investigate if respondent certainty influences anchoring and the shift effect. We find evidence that the anchoring effect is stronger for respondents who are less certain about their response to the contingent valuation question compared to respondents who are very certain. However, the shift effect is significant and negative only for respondents who are very certain. Our results indicate that certain respondents are more consistent with the predictions of rational behaviour than uncertain respondents.",
keywords = "framing effects, certainty, contingent valuation",
author = "Stephane Luchini and Verity Watson",
year = "2013",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1016/j.joep.2013.08.001",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "204--214",
journal = "Journal of Economic Psychology",
issn = "0167-4870",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Uncertainty and framing in a valuation task

AU - Luchini, Stephane

AU - Watson, Verity

PY - 2013/12

Y1 - 2013/12

N2 - Many stated preference studies report framing effects in responses to valuation questions. Framing in stated preference studies occurs when respondents use irrelevant information contained in the question to help them value the good. This may occur because respondents are uncertain or do not hold well-formed preferences for the good in question. We investigate if respondent certainty explains framing effects in a contingent valuation study, using data from a double bounded dichotomous elicitation format and a follow-up certainty question. We investigate if respondent certainty influences anchoring and the shift effect. We find evidence that the anchoring effect is stronger for respondents who are less certain about their response to the contingent valuation question compared to respondents who are very certain. However, the shift effect is significant and negative only for respondents who are very certain. Our results indicate that certain respondents are more consistent with the predictions of rational behaviour than uncertain respondents.

AB - Many stated preference studies report framing effects in responses to valuation questions. Framing in stated preference studies occurs when respondents use irrelevant information contained in the question to help them value the good. This may occur because respondents are uncertain or do not hold well-formed preferences for the good in question. We investigate if respondent certainty explains framing effects in a contingent valuation study, using data from a double bounded dichotomous elicitation format and a follow-up certainty question. We investigate if respondent certainty influences anchoring and the shift effect. We find evidence that the anchoring effect is stronger for respondents who are less certain about their response to the contingent valuation question compared to respondents who are very certain. However, the shift effect is significant and negative only for respondents who are very certain. Our results indicate that certain respondents are more consistent with the predictions of rational behaviour than uncertain respondents.

KW - framing effects

KW - certainty

KW - contingent valuation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84884504202&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.joep.2013.08.001

DO - 10.1016/j.joep.2013.08.001

M3 - Article

VL - 39

SP - 204

EP - 214

JO - Journal of Economic Psychology

JF - Journal of Economic Psychology

SN - 0167-4870

ER -