Urodynamic investigations for management of urinary incontinence in adults

Cathryn M. A. Glazener, Marie C. Lapitan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

71 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background

Urodynamic tests are used to investigate people who have urinary incontinence or other urinary symptoms in order to make a definitive objective diagnosis. The aim is to help to select the treatment most likely to be successful. The investigations are invasive and time consuming.
Objectives

The objective of this review was to discover if treatment according to a urodynamic-based diagnosis led to clinical improvements in urinary incontinence outcomes, compared to treatment based on history and examination.
Search methods

We searched the Cochrane Incontinence Group Specialised Trials Register (searched 29 May 2006) and reference lists of relevant articles.
Selection criteria

Randomised and quasi-randomised trials comparing clinical outcomes in groups of people who were and were not investigated using urodynamics, or comparing one type of urodynamics against another.
Data collection and analysis

Two reviewers independently assessed trial quality and extracted data.
Main results

Three small trials involving 184 people were included but data were only available for 128 participants. In one small trial, women who were investigated with urodynamics were more likely to receive active treatment with drugs or surgery. However, the numbers in the trials were too small to determine if this affected clinical outcomes such as a reduction in incontinence.
Authors' conclusions

A larger definitive trial is needed, in which people are randomly allocated to management according to urodynamic findings or to standard management based on history and clinical examination.
Original languageEnglish
Article numberCD003195
Number of pages30
JournalCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 22 Jul 2002

Fingerprint

Urodynamics
Urinary Incontinence
History
Therapeutics
Randomized Controlled Trials
Pharmaceutical Preparations

Cite this

Urodynamic investigations for management of urinary incontinence in adults. / Glazener, Cathryn M. A.; Lapitan, Marie C.

In: Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, No. 3, CD003195, 22.07.2002.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0a01fbbc776041df9ea323f7ae3ed5a1,
title = "Urodynamic investigations for management of urinary incontinence in adults",
abstract = "BackgroundUrodynamic tests are used to investigate people who have urinary incontinence or other urinary symptoms in order to make a definitive objective diagnosis. The aim is to help to select the treatment most likely to be successful. The investigations are invasive and time consuming.ObjectivesThe objective of this review was to discover if treatment according to a urodynamic-based diagnosis led to clinical improvements in urinary incontinence outcomes, compared to treatment based on history and examination.Search methodsWe searched the Cochrane Incontinence Group Specialised Trials Register (searched 29 May 2006) and reference lists of relevant articles.Selection criteriaRandomised and quasi-randomised trials comparing clinical outcomes in groups of people who were and were not investigated using urodynamics, or comparing one type of urodynamics against another.Data collection and analysisTwo reviewers independently assessed trial quality and extracted data.Main resultsThree small trials involving 184 people were included but data were only available for 128 participants. In one small trial, women who were investigated with urodynamics were more likely to receive active treatment with drugs or surgery. However, the numbers in the trials were too small to determine if this affected clinical outcomes such as a reduction in incontinence.Authors' conclusionsA larger definitive trial is needed, in which people are randomly allocated to management according to urodynamic findings or to standard management based on history and clinical examination.",
author = "Glazener, {Cathryn M. A.} and Lapitan, {Marie C.}",
year = "2002",
month = "7",
day = "22",
doi = "10.1002/14651858.CD003195",
language = "English",
journal = "Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews",
issn = "1469-493X",
publisher = "Wiley",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Urodynamic investigations for management of urinary incontinence in adults

AU - Glazener, Cathryn M. A.

AU - Lapitan, Marie C.

PY - 2002/7/22

Y1 - 2002/7/22

N2 - BackgroundUrodynamic tests are used to investigate people who have urinary incontinence or other urinary symptoms in order to make a definitive objective diagnosis. The aim is to help to select the treatment most likely to be successful. The investigations are invasive and time consuming.ObjectivesThe objective of this review was to discover if treatment according to a urodynamic-based diagnosis led to clinical improvements in urinary incontinence outcomes, compared to treatment based on history and examination.Search methodsWe searched the Cochrane Incontinence Group Specialised Trials Register (searched 29 May 2006) and reference lists of relevant articles.Selection criteriaRandomised and quasi-randomised trials comparing clinical outcomes in groups of people who were and were not investigated using urodynamics, or comparing one type of urodynamics against another.Data collection and analysisTwo reviewers independently assessed trial quality and extracted data.Main resultsThree small trials involving 184 people were included but data were only available for 128 participants. In one small trial, women who were investigated with urodynamics were more likely to receive active treatment with drugs or surgery. However, the numbers in the trials were too small to determine if this affected clinical outcomes such as a reduction in incontinence.Authors' conclusionsA larger definitive trial is needed, in which people are randomly allocated to management according to urodynamic findings or to standard management based on history and clinical examination.

AB - BackgroundUrodynamic tests are used to investigate people who have urinary incontinence or other urinary symptoms in order to make a definitive objective diagnosis. The aim is to help to select the treatment most likely to be successful. The investigations are invasive and time consuming.ObjectivesThe objective of this review was to discover if treatment according to a urodynamic-based diagnosis led to clinical improvements in urinary incontinence outcomes, compared to treatment based on history and examination.Search methodsWe searched the Cochrane Incontinence Group Specialised Trials Register (searched 29 May 2006) and reference lists of relevant articles.Selection criteriaRandomised and quasi-randomised trials comparing clinical outcomes in groups of people who were and were not investigated using urodynamics, or comparing one type of urodynamics against another.Data collection and analysisTwo reviewers independently assessed trial quality and extracted data.Main resultsThree small trials involving 184 people were included but data were only available for 128 participants. In one small trial, women who were investigated with urodynamics were more likely to receive active treatment with drugs or surgery. However, the numbers in the trials were too small to determine if this affected clinical outcomes such as a reduction in incontinence.Authors' conclusionsA larger definitive trial is needed, in which people are randomly allocated to management according to urodynamic findings or to standard management based on history and clinical examination.

U2 - 10.1002/14651858.CD003195

DO - 10.1002/14651858.CD003195

M3 - Article

JO - Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

JF - Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

SN - 1469-493X

IS - 3

M1 - CD003195

ER -