Use of lamplit roads by foraging bats in southern England

D. Blake*, A. M. Hutson, P. A. Racey, J. Rydell, J. R. Speakman

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

70 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Roads illuminated by white streetlamps attracted three times more foraging bats (mostly Pipistrellus pipistrellus) than did roads lit by orange streetlamps or unlit roads (3.2, 1.2 and 0.7 bat passes/km, respectively). More insects flew around white lamps than around orange lamps (mean 0.67 and 0.083 insects per lamp, respectively). The mean number of bat passes recorded in any 1‐km section of road was positively correlated to the number of white streetlamps along the section, and also, independently, to the amount of trees and hedgerows. Bat activity was not related to the number of houses along the road, ambient temperature or cloud cover. The attractive effect of the lamps on the bats was diminished in windy weather. 1994 The Zoological Society of London

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)453-462
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Zoology
Volume234
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Nov 1994

Fingerprint

bat
Chiroptera
England
roads
foraging
road
Pipistrellus pipistrellus
insect
insects
hedgerow
Aleyrodidae
cloud cover
ambient temperature
weather
lamp
temperature

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Animal Science and Zoology

Cite this

Use of lamplit roads by foraging bats in southern England. / Blake, D.; Hutson, A. M.; Racey, P. A.; Rydell, J.; Speakman, J. R.

In: Journal of Zoology, Vol. 234, No. 3, 30.11.1994, p. 453-462.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Blake, D. ; Hutson, A. M. ; Racey, P. A. ; Rydell, J. ; Speakman, J. R. / Use of lamplit roads by foraging bats in southern England. In: Journal of Zoology. 1994 ; Vol. 234, No. 3. pp. 453-462.
@article{e7f9760ce3bd4efbb3a2aa00bab60b40,
title = "Use of lamplit roads by foraging bats in southern England",
abstract = "Roads illuminated by white streetlamps attracted three times more foraging bats (mostly Pipistrellus pipistrellus) than did roads lit by orange streetlamps or unlit roads (3.2, 1.2 and 0.7 bat passes/km, respectively). More insects flew around white lamps than around orange lamps (mean 0.67 and 0.083 insects per lamp, respectively). The mean number of bat passes recorded in any 1‐km section of road was positively correlated to the number of white streetlamps along the section, and also, independently, to the amount of trees and hedgerows. Bat activity was not related to the number of houses along the road, ambient temperature or cloud cover. The attractive effect of the lamps on the bats was diminished in windy weather. 1994 The Zoological Society of London",
author = "D. Blake and Hutson, {A. M.} and Racey, {P. A.} and J. Rydell and Speakman, {J. R.}",
year = "1994",
month = "11",
day = "30",
doi = "10.1111/j.1469-7998.1994.tb04859.x",
language = "English",
volume = "234",
pages = "453--462",
journal = "Journal of Zoology",
issn = "0952-8369",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Use of lamplit roads by foraging bats in southern England

AU - Blake, D.

AU - Hutson, A. M.

AU - Racey, P. A.

AU - Rydell, J.

AU - Speakman, J. R.

PY - 1994/11/30

Y1 - 1994/11/30

N2 - Roads illuminated by white streetlamps attracted three times more foraging bats (mostly Pipistrellus pipistrellus) than did roads lit by orange streetlamps or unlit roads (3.2, 1.2 and 0.7 bat passes/km, respectively). More insects flew around white lamps than around orange lamps (mean 0.67 and 0.083 insects per lamp, respectively). The mean number of bat passes recorded in any 1‐km section of road was positively correlated to the number of white streetlamps along the section, and also, independently, to the amount of trees and hedgerows. Bat activity was not related to the number of houses along the road, ambient temperature or cloud cover. The attractive effect of the lamps on the bats was diminished in windy weather. 1994 The Zoological Society of London

AB - Roads illuminated by white streetlamps attracted three times more foraging bats (mostly Pipistrellus pipistrellus) than did roads lit by orange streetlamps or unlit roads (3.2, 1.2 and 0.7 bat passes/km, respectively). More insects flew around white lamps than around orange lamps (mean 0.67 and 0.083 insects per lamp, respectively). The mean number of bat passes recorded in any 1‐km section of road was positively correlated to the number of white streetlamps along the section, and also, independently, to the amount of trees and hedgerows. Bat activity was not related to the number of houses along the road, ambient temperature or cloud cover. The attractive effect of the lamps on the bats was diminished in windy weather. 1994 The Zoological Society of London

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028591664&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1994.tb04859.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1994.tb04859.x

M3 - Article

VL - 234

SP - 453

EP - 462

JO - Journal of Zoology

JF - Journal of Zoology

SN - 0952-8369

IS - 3

ER -