Using false discovery rates to benchmark SNP-callers in next-generation sequencing projects

Rhys A Farrer (Corresponding Author), Daniel A Henk, Dan MacLean, David J Studholme, Matthew C Fisher

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)
5 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Sequence alignments form the basis for many comparative and population genomic studies. Alignment tools provide a range of accuracies dependent on the divergence between the sequences and the alignment methods. Despite widespread use, there is no standard method for assessing the accuracy of a dataset and alignment strategy after resequencing. We present a framework and tool for determining the overall accuracies of an input read dataset, alignment and SNP-calling method providing an isolate in that dataset has a corresponding, or closely related reference sequence available. In addition to this tool for comparing False Discovery Rates (FDR), we include a method for determining homozygous and heterozygous positions from an alignment using binomial probabilities for an expected error rate. We benchmark this method against other SNP callers using our FDR method with three fungal genomes, finding that it was able achieve a high level of accuracy. These tools are available at http://cfdr.sourceforge.net/.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1512
Number of pages6
JournalScientific Reports
Volume3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 21 Mar 2013

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Using false discovery rates to benchmark SNP-callers in next-generation sequencing projects'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Farrer, R. A., Henk, D. A., MacLean, D., Studholme, D. J., & Fisher, M. C. (2013). Using false discovery rates to benchmark SNP-callers in next-generation sequencing projects. Scientific Reports, 3, [1512]. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep01512