Using reference data on quality of life - The importance of adjusting for age and gender, exemplified by the EORTC QLQ-C30 (+3)

M. J. Hjermstad*, P. M. Fayers, K. Bjordal, S. Kaasa

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

208 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Interpretation of health related quality of life (HRQOL) results in cancer patients is facilitated by knowledge of the levels of HRQOL in the general population. However, direct comparisons can be misleading unless age and gender are considered. We demonstrate the derivation of age- and gender- specific 'expected' values from population reference values by means of simple calculations. This survey included 3000 randomly selected Norwegians above 18 years of age who received the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30 (+ 3)) by mail. 1965 responses from 2,892 eligible persons (68%) were received. The population was divided into six disease groups based on self-reported health problems. The observed mean scale scores of the different groups deviated greatly from those obtained in the general population. The score for physical function, for example, was 72 for cancer patients and ranged from 73.3 to 82.5 in other disease groups, as opposed to 89.9 in the general population and 98.9 in those with no health problems. The range for one of the quality of life (QOL) scales was 57.7 to 84.7 compared with 73.7 in the general population. Expected mean scores for the patient groups were computed from the reference values, based on the concept of equivalence of age and gender. The differences between the observed mean scores and the reference values were strongly mediated by this method. The expected scores for physical function then ranged from 83.3 to 93.1 and from 70.3 to 75 for the QOL scale. The impact of age and gender on the reference data from the EORTC QLQ-C30 (+ 3) obtained in a general population shows that these variables must be considered when interpreting data on HRQOL for cancer patients. The demonstration of how to generate mean values which are adjusted according to the age and gender distribution of a population should increase the usefulness of this questionnaire among clinicians.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1381-1389
Number of pages9
JournalEuropean Journal of Cancer
Volume34
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 1998

Fingerprint

Quality of Life
Population
Reference Values
Neoplasms
Data Accuracy
Age Distribution
Health
Postal Service
Health Status
Organizations
Research
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Clinical importance
  • EORTC QLQ-C30
  • Health related quality of life
  • Reference data

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research

Cite this

Using reference data on quality of life - The importance of adjusting for age and gender, exemplified by the EORTC QLQ-C30 (+3). / Hjermstad, M. J.; Fayers, P. M.; Bjordal, K.; Kaasa, S.

In: European Journal of Cancer, Vol. 34, No. 9, 01.08.1998, p. 1381-1389.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{63989b4b8b624a8aa8eb4ee02430d5dc,
title = "Using reference data on quality of life - The importance of adjusting for age and gender, exemplified by the EORTC QLQ-C30 (+3)",
abstract = "Interpretation of health related quality of life (HRQOL) results in cancer patients is facilitated by knowledge of the levels of HRQOL in the general population. However, direct comparisons can be misleading unless age and gender are considered. We demonstrate the derivation of age- and gender- specific 'expected' values from population reference values by means of simple calculations. This survey included 3000 randomly selected Norwegians above 18 years of age who received the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30 (+ 3)) by mail. 1965 responses from 2,892 eligible persons (68{\%}) were received. The population was divided into six disease groups based on self-reported health problems. The observed mean scale scores of the different groups deviated greatly from those obtained in the general population. The score for physical function, for example, was 72 for cancer patients and ranged from 73.3 to 82.5 in other disease groups, as opposed to 89.9 in the general population and 98.9 in those with no health problems. The range for one of the quality of life (QOL) scales was 57.7 to 84.7 compared with 73.7 in the general population. Expected mean scores for the patient groups were computed from the reference values, based on the concept of equivalence of age and gender. The differences between the observed mean scores and the reference values were strongly mediated by this method. The expected scores for physical function then ranged from 83.3 to 93.1 and from 70.3 to 75 for the QOL scale. The impact of age and gender on the reference data from the EORTC QLQ-C30 (+ 3) obtained in a general population shows that these variables must be considered when interpreting data on HRQOL for cancer patients. The demonstration of how to generate mean values which are adjusted according to the age and gender distribution of a population should increase the usefulness of this questionnaire among clinicians.",
keywords = "Clinical importance, EORTC QLQ-C30, Health related quality of life, Reference data",
author = "Hjermstad, {M. J.} and Fayers, {P. M.} and K. Bjordal and S. Kaasa",
note = "Acknowledgements The authors wish to thank Anders Skjeggestad, regarding data management, and Gro Underland for good organising and practical help. Financial support by grant no. 93094/001 from the Norwegian Cancer Society.",
year = "1998",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0959-8049(98)00136-1",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "1381--1389",
journal = "European Journal of Cancer",
issn = "0959-8049",
publisher = "ELSEVIER APPL SCI PUBL LTD",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Using reference data on quality of life - The importance of adjusting for age and gender, exemplified by the EORTC QLQ-C30 (+3)

AU - Hjermstad, M. J.

AU - Fayers, P. M.

AU - Bjordal, K.

AU - Kaasa, S.

N1 - Acknowledgements The authors wish to thank Anders Skjeggestad, regarding data management, and Gro Underland for good organising and practical help. Financial support by grant no. 93094/001 from the Norwegian Cancer Society.

PY - 1998/8/1

Y1 - 1998/8/1

N2 - Interpretation of health related quality of life (HRQOL) results in cancer patients is facilitated by knowledge of the levels of HRQOL in the general population. However, direct comparisons can be misleading unless age and gender are considered. We demonstrate the derivation of age- and gender- specific 'expected' values from population reference values by means of simple calculations. This survey included 3000 randomly selected Norwegians above 18 years of age who received the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30 (+ 3)) by mail. 1965 responses from 2,892 eligible persons (68%) were received. The population was divided into six disease groups based on self-reported health problems. The observed mean scale scores of the different groups deviated greatly from those obtained in the general population. The score for physical function, for example, was 72 for cancer patients and ranged from 73.3 to 82.5 in other disease groups, as opposed to 89.9 in the general population and 98.9 in those with no health problems. The range for one of the quality of life (QOL) scales was 57.7 to 84.7 compared with 73.7 in the general population. Expected mean scores for the patient groups were computed from the reference values, based on the concept of equivalence of age and gender. The differences between the observed mean scores and the reference values were strongly mediated by this method. The expected scores for physical function then ranged from 83.3 to 93.1 and from 70.3 to 75 for the QOL scale. The impact of age and gender on the reference data from the EORTC QLQ-C30 (+ 3) obtained in a general population shows that these variables must be considered when interpreting data on HRQOL for cancer patients. The demonstration of how to generate mean values which are adjusted according to the age and gender distribution of a population should increase the usefulness of this questionnaire among clinicians.

AB - Interpretation of health related quality of life (HRQOL) results in cancer patients is facilitated by knowledge of the levels of HRQOL in the general population. However, direct comparisons can be misleading unless age and gender are considered. We demonstrate the derivation of age- and gender- specific 'expected' values from population reference values by means of simple calculations. This survey included 3000 randomly selected Norwegians above 18 years of age who received the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30 (+ 3)) by mail. 1965 responses from 2,892 eligible persons (68%) were received. The population was divided into six disease groups based on self-reported health problems. The observed mean scale scores of the different groups deviated greatly from those obtained in the general population. The score for physical function, for example, was 72 for cancer patients and ranged from 73.3 to 82.5 in other disease groups, as opposed to 89.9 in the general population and 98.9 in those with no health problems. The range for one of the quality of life (QOL) scales was 57.7 to 84.7 compared with 73.7 in the general population. Expected mean scores for the patient groups were computed from the reference values, based on the concept of equivalence of age and gender. The differences between the observed mean scores and the reference values were strongly mediated by this method. The expected scores for physical function then ranged from 83.3 to 93.1 and from 70.3 to 75 for the QOL scale. The impact of age and gender on the reference data from the EORTC QLQ-C30 (+ 3) obtained in a general population shows that these variables must be considered when interpreting data on HRQOL for cancer patients. The demonstration of how to generate mean values which are adjusted according to the age and gender distribution of a population should increase the usefulness of this questionnaire among clinicians.

KW - Clinical importance

KW - EORTC QLQ-C30

KW - Health related quality of life

KW - Reference data

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032146090&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0959-8049(98)00136-1

DO - 10.1016/S0959-8049(98)00136-1

M3 - Article

C2 - 9849421

AN - SCOPUS:0032146090

VL - 34

SP - 1381

EP - 1389

JO - European Journal of Cancer

JF - European Journal of Cancer

SN - 0959-8049

IS - 9

ER -