Using the theory of planned behaviour as a process evaluation tool in randomised trials of knowledge translation strategies

A case study from UK primary care

Craig R. Ramsay, Ruth E. Thomas, Bernard L. Croal, Jeremy M. Grimshaw, Martin P. Eccles

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

31 Citations (Scopus)
4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Randomised trials of knowledge translation strategies for professional behaviour change can provide robust estimates of effectiveness, but offer little insight into the causal mechanisms by which any change is produced. To illustrate the applicability of causal methods within randomised trials, we undertook a theory-based process evaluation study within an implementation trial to explore whether the cognitions of primary care doctors' predicted their test requesting behaviours and, secondly, whether the trial results were mediated by the theoretical constructs.

Methods: The process evaluation comprised a cross-sectional questionnaire survey of a random 50% sample of the randomised groups of primary care practices in Grampian (NHS Grampian), UK, who took part in a trial of the effect of enhanced feedback and brief educational reminders on test requesting behaviour. The process evaluation was based upon the Theory of Planned Behaviour and focussed on three of the test requesting behaviours that were targeted in the trial - ferritin, follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), and Helicobacter Pylori serology (HPS).

Results: The questionnaire was completed by 131 primary care doctors (56%) from 42 (98%) of the sampled practices. Behavioural intention, attitude, and subjective norm were highly correlated for all the tests. There was no evidence that perceived behavioural control was correlated with any of the other measures. Simple linear regression analysis of the rate of test requests on minimum behavioural intentions had R-2 of 11.1%, 12.5%, and 0.1% for ferritin, FSH, and HPS requesting, respectively. Mediational analysis showed that the trial results for ferritin and FSH were partially mediated (between 23% and 78% mediation) through intentions. The HPS trial result was not mediated through intention.

Conclusions: This study demonstrated that a theory-based process evaluation can provide useful information on causal mechanisms that aid not only interpretation of the trial but also inform future evaluations and intervention development.

Original languageEnglish
Article number71
Number of pages9
JournalImplementation Science
Volume5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 29 Sep 2010

Keywords

  • complex interventions
  • professionals
  • intentions
  • model

Cite this

Using the theory of planned behaviour as a process evaluation tool in randomised trials of knowledge translation strategies : A case study from UK primary care. / Ramsay, Craig R.; Thomas, Ruth E.; Croal, Bernard L.; Grimshaw, Jeremy M.; Eccles, Martin P.

In: Implementation Science, Vol. 5, 71, 29.09.2010.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b7a914bc19a7497ea903e7aeb4efe89c,
title = "Using the theory of planned behaviour as a process evaluation tool in randomised trials of knowledge translation strategies: A case study from UK primary care",
abstract = "Background: Randomised trials of knowledge translation strategies for professional behaviour change can provide robust estimates of effectiveness, but offer little insight into the causal mechanisms by which any change is produced. To illustrate the applicability of causal methods within randomised trials, we undertook a theory-based process evaluation study within an implementation trial to explore whether the cognitions of primary care doctors' predicted their test requesting behaviours and, secondly, whether the trial results were mediated by the theoretical constructs.Methods: The process evaluation comprised a cross-sectional questionnaire survey of a random 50{\%} sample of the randomised groups of primary care practices in Grampian (NHS Grampian), UK, who took part in a trial of the effect of enhanced feedback and brief educational reminders on test requesting behaviour. The process evaluation was based upon the Theory of Planned Behaviour and focussed on three of the test requesting behaviours that were targeted in the trial - ferritin, follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), and Helicobacter Pylori serology (HPS).Results: The questionnaire was completed by 131 primary care doctors (56{\%}) from 42 (98{\%}) of the sampled practices. Behavioural intention, attitude, and subjective norm were highly correlated for all the tests. There was no evidence that perceived behavioural control was correlated with any of the other measures. Simple linear regression analysis of the rate of test requests on minimum behavioural intentions had R-2 of 11.1{\%}, 12.5{\%}, and 0.1{\%} for ferritin, FSH, and HPS requesting, respectively. Mediational analysis showed that the trial results for ferritin and FSH were partially mediated (between 23{\%} and 78{\%} mediation) through intentions. The HPS trial result was not mediated through intention.Conclusions: This study demonstrated that a theory-based process evaluation can provide useful information on causal mechanisms that aid not only interpretation of the trial but also inform future evaluations and intervention development.",
keywords = "complex interventions, professionals, intentions, model",
author = "Ramsay, {Craig R.} and Thomas, {Ruth E.} and Croal, {Bernard L.} and Grimshaw, {Jeremy M.} and Eccles, {Martin P.}",
year = "2010",
month = "9",
day = "29",
doi = "10.1186/1748-5908-5-71",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
journal = "Implementation Science",
issn = "1748-5908",
publisher = "BioMed Central",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Using the theory of planned behaviour as a process evaluation tool in randomised trials of knowledge translation strategies

T2 - A case study from UK primary care

AU - Ramsay, Craig R.

AU - Thomas, Ruth E.

AU - Croal, Bernard L.

AU - Grimshaw, Jeremy M.

AU - Eccles, Martin P.

PY - 2010/9/29

Y1 - 2010/9/29

N2 - Background: Randomised trials of knowledge translation strategies for professional behaviour change can provide robust estimates of effectiveness, but offer little insight into the causal mechanisms by which any change is produced. To illustrate the applicability of causal methods within randomised trials, we undertook a theory-based process evaluation study within an implementation trial to explore whether the cognitions of primary care doctors' predicted their test requesting behaviours and, secondly, whether the trial results were mediated by the theoretical constructs.Methods: The process evaluation comprised a cross-sectional questionnaire survey of a random 50% sample of the randomised groups of primary care practices in Grampian (NHS Grampian), UK, who took part in a trial of the effect of enhanced feedback and brief educational reminders on test requesting behaviour. The process evaluation was based upon the Theory of Planned Behaviour and focussed on three of the test requesting behaviours that were targeted in the trial - ferritin, follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), and Helicobacter Pylori serology (HPS).Results: The questionnaire was completed by 131 primary care doctors (56%) from 42 (98%) of the sampled practices. Behavioural intention, attitude, and subjective norm were highly correlated for all the tests. There was no evidence that perceived behavioural control was correlated with any of the other measures. Simple linear regression analysis of the rate of test requests on minimum behavioural intentions had R-2 of 11.1%, 12.5%, and 0.1% for ferritin, FSH, and HPS requesting, respectively. Mediational analysis showed that the trial results for ferritin and FSH were partially mediated (between 23% and 78% mediation) through intentions. The HPS trial result was not mediated through intention.Conclusions: This study demonstrated that a theory-based process evaluation can provide useful information on causal mechanisms that aid not only interpretation of the trial but also inform future evaluations and intervention development.

AB - Background: Randomised trials of knowledge translation strategies for professional behaviour change can provide robust estimates of effectiveness, but offer little insight into the causal mechanisms by which any change is produced. To illustrate the applicability of causal methods within randomised trials, we undertook a theory-based process evaluation study within an implementation trial to explore whether the cognitions of primary care doctors' predicted their test requesting behaviours and, secondly, whether the trial results were mediated by the theoretical constructs.Methods: The process evaluation comprised a cross-sectional questionnaire survey of a random 50% sample of the randomised groups of primary care practices in Grampian (NHS Grampian), UK, who took part in a trial of the effect of enhanced feedback and brief educational reminders on test requesting behaviour. The process evaluation was based upon the Theory of Planned Behaviour and focussed on three of the test requesting behaviours that were targeted in the trial - ferritin, follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), and Helicobacter Pylori serology (HPS).Results: The questionnaire was completed by 131 primary care doctors (56%) from 42 (98%) of the sampled practices. Behavioural intention, attitude, and subjective norm were highly correlated for all the tests. There was no evidence that perceived behavioural control was correlated with any of the other measures. Simple linear regression analysis of the rate of test requests on minimum behavioural intentions had R-2 of 11.1%, 12.5%, and 0.1% for ferritin, FSH, and HPS requesting, respectively. Mediational analysis showed that the trial results for ferritin and FSH were partially mediated (between 23% and 78% mediation) through intentions. The HPS trial result was not mediated through intention.Conclusions: This study demonstrated that a theory-based process evaluation can provide useful information on causal mechanisms that aid not only interpretation of the trial but also inform future evaluations and intervention development.

KW - complex interventions

KW - professionals

KW - intentions

KW - model

U2 - 10.1186/1748-5908-5-71

DO - 10.1186/1748-5908-5-71

M3 - Article

VL - 5

JO - Implementation Science

JF - Implementation Science

SN - 1748-5908

M1 - 71

ER -