Vegetation change

A reunifying concept in plant ecology

Mark A. Davis*, Jan Pergl, Anne-Marie Truscott, Johannes Kollmann, Jan P. Bakker, Roser Domenech, Karel Prach, Anne Hélène Prieur-Richard, Roos M. Veeneklaas, Petr Pyšek, Roger Del Moral, Richard J. Hobbs, Scott L. Collins, Steward T A Pickett, Peter B. Reich

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

47 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Specialization can become detrimental to a discipline if it fosters intellectual isolation. A bibliographic analysis of several research areas in plant ecology (invasion biology, succession ecology, gap/patch dynamics, and global change effects on plants) revealed that plant ecologists do not regularly make use of the findings and insights of very similar studies being conducted in other research subdisciplines, nor do they try to make their findings and insights easily accessible to researchers in other areas. Invasion papers were least likely to be cross-linked (6%) with other fields, whereas gap/patch dynamics papers were most likely to be cross-linked (15%). This tendency toward intellectual isolation may be impeding efforts to achieve more powerful generalizations in ecology by reducing the number of potentially productive exchanges among researchers. In this paper, we illustrate this problem using the example of several speciality areas that study vegetation change. We argue that, rather than characterizing studies of vegetation change on the basis of what distinguishes them from one another, plant ecologists would benefit from concentrating on what such studies have in common. As an example, we propose that several speciality areas of plant ecology could be reunified under the term ecology of vegetation change. Individual researchers, journals, and ecological societies all can take specific steps to increase the useful exchange of ideas and information among research areas. Promoting rapid and more effective communication among diverse researchers may reduce the proliferation of narrow theories, concepts, and terminologies associated with particular research areas. In this way, we can expedite our understanding of the ecological mechanisms and consequences associated with plant communities.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)69-76
Number of pages8
JournalPerspectives in plant ecology, evolution and systematics
Volume7
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31 Mar 2005

Fingerprint

plant ecology
researchers
patch dynamics
vegetation
ecology
ecologists
terminology
concentrating
communication (human)
global change
plant community
plant communities
communication
Biological Sciences

Keywords

  • Climate change
  • Gap dynamics
  • Invasion ecology
  • Patch dynamics
  • Succession
  • Vegetation change

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Cite this

Davis, M. A., Pergl, J., Truscott, A-M., Kollmann, J., Bakker, J. P., Domenech, R., ... Reich, P. B. (2005). Vegetation change: A reunifying concept in plant ecology. Perspectives in plant ecology, evolution and systematics, 7(1), 69-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppees.2004.11.001

Vegetation change : A reunifying concept in plant ecology. / Davis, Mark A.; Pergl, Jan; Truscott, Anne-Marie; Kollmann, Johannes; Bakker, Jan P.; Domenech, Roser; Prach, Karel; Prieur-Richard, Anne Hélène; Veeneklaas, Roos M.; Pyšek, Petr; Del Moral, Roger; Hobbs, Richard J.; Collins, Scott L.; Pickett, Steward T A; Reich, Peter B.

In: Perspectives in plant ecology, evolution and systematics, Vol. 7, No. 1, 31.03.2005, p. 69-76.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Davis, MA, Pergl, J, Truscott, A-M, Kollmann, J, Bakker, JP, Domenech, R, Prach, K, Prieur-Richard, AH, Veeneklaas, RM, Pyšek, P, Del Moral, R, Hobbs, RJ, Collins, SL, Pickett, STA & Reich, PB 2005, 'Vegetation change: A reunifying concept in plant ecology', Perspectives in plant ecology, evolution and systematics, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 69-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppees.2004.11.001
Davis, Mark A. ; Pergl, Jan ; Truscott, Anne-Marie ; Kollmann, Johannes ; Bakker, Jan P. ; Domenech, Roser ; Prach, Karel ; Prieur-Richard, Anne Hélène ; Veeneklaas, Roos M. ; Pyšek, Petr ; Del Moral, Roger ; Hobbs, Richard J. ; Collins, Scott L. ; Pickett, Steward T A ; Reich, Peter B. / Vegetation change : A reunifying concept in plant ecology. In: Perspectives in plant ecology, evolution and systematics. 2005 ; Vol. 7, No. 1. pp. 69-76.
@article{652acdf1ea0849bda3011133f348cacc,
title = "Vegetation change: A reunifying concept in plant ecology",
abstract = "Specialization can become detrimental to a discipline if it fosters intellectual isolation. A bibliographic analysis of several research areas in plant ecology (invasion biology, succession ecology, gap/patch dynamics, and global change effects on plants) revealed that plant ecologists do not regularly make use of the findings and insights of very similar studies being conducted in other research subdisciplines, nor do they try to make their findings and insights easily accessible to researchers in other areas. Invasion papers were least likely to be cross-linked (6{\%}) with other fields, whereas gap/patch dynamics papers were most likely to be cross-linked (15{\%}). This tendency toward intellectual isolation may be impeding efforts to achieve more powerful generalizations in ecology by reducing the number of potentially productive exchanges among researchers. In this paper, we illustrate this problem using the example of several speciality areas that study vegetation change. We argue that, rather than characterizing studies of vegetation change on the basis of what distinguishes them from one another, plant ecologists would benefit from concentrating on what such studies have in common. As an example, we propose that several speciality areas of plant ecology could be reunified under the term ecology of vegetation change. Individual researchers, journals, and ecological societies all can take specific steps to increase the useful exchange of ideas and information among research areas. Promoting rapid and more effective communication among diverse researchers may reduce the proliferation of narrow theories, concepts, and terminologies associated with particular research areas. In this way, we can expedite our understanding of the ecological mechanisms and consequences associated with plant communities.",
keywords = "Climate change, Gap dynamics, Invasion ecology, Patch dynamics, Succession, Vegetation change",
author = "Davis, {Mark A.} and Jan Pergl and Anne-Marie Truscott and Johannes Kollmann and Bakker, {Jan P.} and Roser Domenech and Karel Prach and Prieur-Richard, {Anne H{\'e}l{\`e}ne} and Veeneklaas, {Roos M.} and Petr Pyšek and {Del Moral}, Roger and Hobbs, {Richard J.} and Collins, {Scott L.} and Pickett, {Steward T A} and Reich, {Peter B.}",
year = "2005",
month = "3",
day = "31",
doi = "10.1016/j.ppees.2004.11.001",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "69--76",
journal = "Perspectives in plant ecology, evolution and systematics",
issn = "1433-8319",
publisher = "Urban und Fischer Verlag Jena",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Vegetation change

T2 - A reunifying concept in plant ecology

AU - Davis, Mark A.

AU - Pergl, Jan

AU - Truscott, Anne-Marie

AU - Kollmann, Johannes

AU - Bakker, Jan P.

AU - Domenech, Roser

AU - Prach, Karel

AU - Prieur-Richard, Anne Hélène

AU - Veeneklaas, Roos M.

AU - Pyšek, Petr

AU - Del Moral, Roger

AU - Hobbs, Richard J.

AU - Collins, Scott L.

AU - Pickett, Steward T A

AU - Reich, Peter B.

PY - 2005/3/31

Y1 - 2005/3/31

N2 - Specialization can become detrimental to a discipline if it fosters intellectual isolation. A bibliographic analysis of several research areas in plant ecology (invasion biology, succession ecology, gap/patch dynamics, and global change effects on plants) revealed that plant ecologists do not regularly make use of the findings and insights of very similar studies being conducted in other research subdisciplines, nor do they try to make their findings and insights easily accessible to researchers in other areas. Invasion papers were least likely to be cross-linked (6%) with other fields, whereas gap/patch dynamics papers were most likely to be cross-linked (15%). This tendency toward intellectual isolation may be impeding efforts to achieve more powerful generalizations in ecology by reducing the number of potentially productive exchanges among researchers. In this paper, we illustrate this problem using the example of several speciality areas that study vegetation change. We argue that, rather than characterizing studies of vegetation change on the basis of what distinguishes them from one another, plant ecologists would benefit from concentrating on what such studies have in common. As an example, we propose that several speciality areas of plant ecology could be reunified under the term ecology of vegetation change. Individual researchers, journals, and ecological societies all can take specific steps to increase the useful exchange of ideas and information among research areas. Promoting rapid and more effective communication among diverse researchers may reduce the proliferation of narrow theories, concepts, and terminologies associated with particular research areas. In this way, we can expedite our understanding of the ecological mechanisms and consequences associated with plant communities.

AB - Specialization can become detrimental to a discipline if it fosters intellectual isolation. A bibliographic analysis of several research areas in plant ecology (invasion biology, succession ecology, gap/patch dynamics, and global change effects on plants) revealed that plant ecologists do not regularly make use of the findings and insights of very similar studies being conducted in other research subdisciplines, nor do they try to make their findings and insights easily accessible to researchers in other areas. Invasion papers were least likely to be cross-linked (6%) with other fields, whereas gap/patch dynamics papers were most likely to be cross-linked (15%). This tendency toward intellectual isolation may be impeding efforts to achieve more powerful generalizations in ecology by reducing the number of potentially productive exchanges among researchers. In this paper, we illustrate this problem using the example of several speciality areas that study vegetation change. We argue that, rather than characterizing studies of vegetation change on the basis of what distinguishes them from one another, plant ecologists would benefit from concentrating on what such studies have in common. As an example, we propose that several speciality areas of plant ecology could be reunified under the term ecology of vegetation change. Individual researchers, journals, and ecological societies all can take specific steps to increase the useful exchange of ideas and information among research areas. Promoting rapid and more effective communication among diverse researchers may reduce the proliferation of narrow theories, concepts, and terminologies associated with particular research areas. In this way, we can expedite our understanding of the ecological mechanisms and consequences associated with plant communities.

KW - Climate change

KW - Gap dynamics

KW - Invasion ecology

KW - Patch dynamics

KW - Succession

KW - Vegetation change

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=20144384729&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ppees.2004.11.001

DO - 10.1016/j.ppees.2004.11.001

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 69

EP - 76

JO - Perspectives in plant ecology, evolution and systematics

JF - Perspectives in plant ecology, evolution and systematics

SN - 1433-8319

IS - 1

ER -