Waging War for the Righteous: William Eaton on Enlightenment, Empire, and Coup d’état in the First Barbary War, 1801-1805

C. B. Bow (Corresponding Author)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The Ottoman provinces of Tripoli, Algiers, Tunis, and the independent sultanate of Morocco, known as Barbary States, terrorized merchant ships with piracy of cargoes and enslavement of their sailors throughout the early modern period. Barbary privateers, known as corsairs, justified their selective targeting of ‘kafir’ or ‘infidel’ merchant ships as waging ‘sea jihad’. Agents of empire struggled to reconcile principles of ‘just war’ in the natural law tradition with the negotiated payment of Barbary tributes for unobstructed passage through the Mediterranean. Resolving this Barbary threat by way of war or tribute involved American interests after 1783. This article examines the ways in which William Eaton, as the United States Consul for Tunis, intervened between Enlightenment and imperial responses to Barbary piracy. Eaton defied Thomas Jefferson's foreign policies by engineering the first American attempt at coup d’état in a foreign government. In doing so, Eaton's strategy of military interventionism offered an alternative to perennial Enlightenment and imperial designs for war and peace in the Islamic world.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)692-709
Number of pages18
JournalHistory
Volume101
Issue number348
Early online date21 Dec 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2016

Fingerprint

Coup
Enlightenment
Piracy
Ship
Merchants
Tunis
Kafir
Natural Law
Infidel
Foreign Policy
Thomas Jefferson
Interventionism
Peace
Military
Government
Morocco
Just War
Sailors
Threat
Jihad

Cite this

@article{7b78a1331a3c4b238875c7230e3dcb60,
title = "Waging War for the Righteous: William Eaton on Enlightenment, Empire, and Coup d’{\'e}tat in the First Barbary War, 1801-1805",
abstract = "The Ottoman provinces of Tripoli, Algiers, Tunis, and the independent sultanate of Morocco, known as Barbary States, terrorized merchant ships with piracy of cargoes and enslavement of their sailors throughout the early modern period. Barbary privateers, known as corsairs, justified their selective targeting of ‘kafir’ or ‘infidel’ merchant ships as waging ‘sea jihad’. Agents of empire struggled to reconcile principles of ‘just war’ in the natural law tradition with the negotiated payment of Barbary tributes for unobstructed passage through the Mediterranean. Resolving this Barbary threat by way of war or tribute involved American interests after 1783. This article examines the ways in which William Eaton, as the United States Consul for Tunis, intervened between Enlightenment and imperial responses to Barbary piracy. Eaton defied Thomas Jefferson's foreign policies by engineering the first American attempt at coup d’{\'e}tat in a foreign government. In doing so, Eaton's strategy of military interventionism offered an alternative to perennial Enlightenment and imperial designs for war and peace in the Islamic world.",
author = "Bow, {C. B.}",
year = "2016",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1111/1468-229X.12324",
language = "English",
volume = "101",
pages = "692--709",
journal = "History",
issn = "0018-2648",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "348",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Waging War for the Righteous

T2 - William Eaton on Enlightenment, Empire, and Coup d’état in the First Barbary War, 1801-1805

AU - Bow, C. B.

PY - 2016/12

Y1 - 2016/12

N2 - The Ottoman provinces of Tripoli, Algiers, Tunis, and the independent sultanate of Morocco, known as Barbary States, terrorized merchant ships with piracy of cargoes and enslavement of their sailors throughout the early modern period. Barbary privateers, known as corsairs, justified their selective targeting of ‘kafir’ or ‘infidel’ merchant ships as waging ‘sea jihad’. Agents of empire struggled to reconcile principles of ‘just war’ in the natural law tradition with the negotiated payment of Barbary tributes for unobstructed passage through the Mediterranean. Resolving this Barbary threat by way of war or tribute involved American interests after 1783. This article examines the ways in which William Eaton, as the United States Consul for Tunis, intervened between Enlightenment and imperial responses to Barbary piracy. Eaton defied Thomas Jefferson's foreign policies by engineering the first American attempt at coup d’état in a foreign government. In doing so, Eaton's strategy of military interventionism offered an alternative to perennial Enlightenment and imperial designs for war and peace in the Islamic world.

AB - The Ottoman provinces of Tripoli, Algiers, Tunis, and the independent sultanate of Morocco, known as Barbary States, terrorized merchant ships with piracy of cargoes and enslavement of their sailors throughout the early modern period. Barbary privateers, known as corsairs, justified their selective targeting of ‘kafir’ or ‘infidel’ merchant ships as waging ‘sea jihad’. Agents of empire struggled to reconcile principles of ‘just war’ in the natural law tradition with the negotiated payment of Barbary tributes for unobstructed passage through the Mediterranean. Resolving this Barbary threat by way of war or tribute involved American interests after 1783. This article examines the ways in which William Eaton, as the United States Consul for Tunis, intervened between Enlightenment and imperial responses to Barbary piracy. Eaton defied Thomas Jefferson's foreign policies by engineering the first American attempt at coup d’état in a foreign government. In doing so, Eaton's strategy of military interventionism offered an alternative to perennial Enlightenment and imperial designs for war and peace in the Islamic world.

U2 - 10.1111/1468-229X.12324

DO - 10.1111/1468-229X.12324

M3 - Article

VL - 101

SP - 692

EP - 709

JO - History

JF - History

SN - 0018-2648

IS - 348

ER -