WAIS III UK: An extension of the UK comparability study

R. Wycherely, A. Lavender, S. Holttum, John Robertson Crawford, D. Mockler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives. To correct and augment the sample on which a previous study, assessing the applicability of USA WAIS III norms to the UK population, was based. To repeat this study using the modified sample.

Design. The WAIS III UK was administered to a supplementary sample, which was used to enhance and correct the original sample, allowing a better match to UK population demographics.

Method. WAIS III UK scores were processed using USA norms.

Results. Distributions of UK IQ, Index, and subtest scores were consistent with USA norms. Means were significantly above USA values and did not show a flat profile. Correlational analysis suggested the presence of an age-related sampling bias, which was then statistically controlled for using analysis of covariance, with age as covariate, to give corrected means. These means, with the exception of two subtests (block design and picture arrangement), did not differ significantly from USA values.

Conclusion. With a minor proviso concerning the above subtests, it is probable that USA norms can be safely used with the UK population. Future UK samples need to ensure random sampling within demographic categories if sampling bias is to be avoided.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)279-288
Number of pages9
JournalBritish Journal of Clinical Psychology
Volume44
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2005

Keywords

  • SAMPLE

Cite this

WAIS III UK: An extension of the UK comparability study. / Wycherely, R.; Lavender, A.; Holttum, S.; Crawford, John Robertson; Mockler, D.

In: British Journal of Clinical Psychology, Vol. 44, 2005, p. 279-288.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wycherely, R. ; Lavender, A. ; Holttum, S. ; Crawford, John Robertson ; Mockler, D. / WAIS III UK: An extension of the UK comparability study. In: British Journal of Clinical Psychology. 2005 ; Vol. 44. pp. 279-288.
@article{1b1c9be22f904e458a2f5d4bbe8e77af,
title = "WAIS III UK: An extension of the UK comparability study",
abstract = "Objectives. To correct and augment the sample on which a previous study, assessing the applicability of USA WAIS III norms to the UK population, was based. To repeat this study using the modified sample.Design. The WAIS III UK was administered to a supplementary sample, which was used to enhance and correct the original sample, allowing a better match to UK population demographics.Method. WAIS III UK scores were processed using USA norms.Results. Distributions of UK IQ, Index, and subtest scores were consistent with USA norms. Means were significantly above USA values and did not show a flat profile. Correlational analysis suggested the presence of an age-related sampling bias, which was then statistically controlled for using analysis of covariance, with age as covariate, to give corrected means. These means, with the exception of two subtests (block design and picture arrangement), did not differ significantly from USA values.Conclusion. With a minor proviso concerning the above subtests, it is probable that USA norms can be safely used with the UK population. Future UK samples need to ensure random sampling within demographic categories if sampling bias is to be avoided.",
keywords = "SAMPLE",
author = "R. Wycherely and A. Lavender and S. Holttum and Crawford, {John Robertson} and D. Mockler",
year = "2005",
doi = "10.1348/014466505X29440",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "279--288",
journal = "British Journal of Clinical Psychology",
issn = "0144-6657",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - WAIS III UK: An extension of the UK comparability study

AU - Wycherely, R.

AU - Lavender, A.

AU - Holttum, S.

AU - Crawford, John Robertson

AU - Mockler, D.

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - Objectives. To correct and augment the sample on which a previous study, assessing the applicability of USA WAIS III norms to the UK population, was based. To repeat this study using the modified sample.Design. The WAIS III UK was administered to a supplementary sample, which was used to enhance and correct the original sample, allowing a better match to UK population demographics.Method. WAIS III UK scores were processed using USA norms.Results. Distributions of UK IQ, Index, and subtest scores were consistent with USA norms. Means were significantly above USA values and did not show a flat profile. Correlational analysis suggested the presence of an age-related sampling bias, which was then statistically controlled for using analysis of covariance, with age as covariate, to give corrected means. These means, with the exception of two subtests (block design and picture arrangement), did not differ significantly from USA values.Conclusion. With a minor proviso concerning the above subtests, it is probable that USA norms can be safely used with the UK population. Future UK samples need to ensure random sampling within demographic categories if sampling bias is to be avoided.

AB - Objectives. To correct and augment the sample on which a previous study, assessing the applicability of USA WAIS III norms to the UK population, was based. To repeat this study using the modified sample.Design. The WAIS III UK was administered to a supplementary sample, which was used to enhance and correct the original sample, allowing a better match to UK population demographics.Method. WAIS III UK scores were processed using USA norms.Results. Distributions of UK IQ, Index, and subtest scores were consistent with USA norms. Means were significantly above USA values and did not show a flat profile. Correlational analysis suggested the presence of an age-related sampling bias, which was then statistically controlled for using analysis of covariance, with age as covariate, to give corrected means. These means, with the exception of two subtests (block design and picture arrangement), did not differ significantly from USA values.Conclusion. With a minor proviso concerning the above subtests, it is probable that USA norms can be safely used with the UK population. Future UK samples need to ensure random sampling within demographic categories if sampling bias is to be avoided.

KW - SAMPLE

U2 - 10.1348/014466505X29440

DO - 10.1348/014466505X29440

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - 279

EP - 288

JO - British Journal of Clinical Psychology

JF - British Journal of Clinical Psychology

SN - 0144-6657

ER -