Waist–hip ratio predicts women’s preferences for masculine male faces, but not perceptions of men’s trustworthiness

Finlay G Smith, Benedict C Jones, Lisa L W Welling, Anthony C Little, Jovana Vukovic, Julie C Main, Lisa M DeBruine

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Studies show that attractive women demonstrate stronger preferences for masculine men than relatively unattractive women do. Such condition-dependent preferences may occur because attractive women can more easily offset the costs associated with choosing a masculine partner, such as lack of commitment and less interest in parenting. Alternatively, if masculine men display negative characteristics less to attractive women than to unattractive women, attractive women may perceive masculine men to have more positive personality traits than relatively unattractive women do. We examined how two indices of women’s attractiveness, body mass index (BMI) and waist–hip ratio (WHR), relate to perceptions of both the attractiveness and trustworthiness of masculinized versus feminized male faces. Consistent with previous studies, women with a low (attractive) WHR had stronger preferences for masculine male faces than did women with a relatively high (unattractive) WHR. This relationship remained significant when controlling for possible effects of BMI. Neither WHR nor BMI predicted perceptions of trustworthiness. These findings present converging evidence for condition-dependent mate preferences in women and suggest that such preferences do not reflect individual differences in the extent to which pro-social traits are ascribed to feminine versus masculine men.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)476-480
Number of pages5
JournalPersonality and Individual Differences
Volume47
Issue number5
Early online date22 May 2009
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2009

Fingerprint

Body Mass Index
Parenting
Individuality
Personality
Costs and Cost Analysis
Sociological Factors

Keywords

  • condition-dependent preferences
  • masculinity
  • waist–hip ratio
  • body mass index
  • attractiveness
  • trustworthiness
  • faces

Cite this

Smith, F. G., Jones, B. C., Welling, L. L. W., Little, A. C., Vukovic, J., Main, J. C., & DeBruine, L. M. (2009). Waist–hip ratio predicts women’s preferences for masculine male faces, but not perceptions of men’s trustworthiness. Personality and Individual Differences, 47(5), 476-480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.04.022

Waist–hip ratio predicts women’s preferences for masculine male faces, but not perceptions of men’s trustworthiness. / Smith, Finlay G; Jones, Benedict C; Welling, Lisa L W; Little, Anthony C; Vukovic, Jovana; Main, Julie C; DeBruine, Lisa M.

In: Personality and Individual Differences, Vol. 47, No. 5, 10.2009, p. 476-480.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Smith, Finlay G ; Jones, Benedict C ; Welling, Lisa L W ; Little, Anthony C ; Vukovic, Jovana ; Main, Julie C ; DeBruine, Lisa M. / Waist–hip ratio predicts women’s preferences for masculine male faces, but not perceptions of men’s trustworthiness. In: Personality and Individual Differences. 2009 ; Vol. 47, No. 5. pp. 476-480.
@article{61614d85ec6a45afb309a8f4015b0883,
title = "Waist–hip ratio predicts women’s preferences for masculine male faces, but not perceptions of men’s trustworthiness",
abstract = "Studies show that attractive women demonstrate stronger preferences for masculine men than relatively unattractive women do. Such condition-dependent preferences may occur because attractive women can more easily offset the costs associated with choosing a masculine partner, such as lack of commitment and less interest in parenting. Alternatively, if masculine men display negative characteristics less to attractive women than to unattractive women, attractive women may perceive masculine men to have more positive personality traits than relatively unattractive women do. We examined how two indices of women’s attractiveness, body mass index (BMI) and waist–hip ratio (WHR), relate to perceptions of both the attractiveness and trustworthiness of masculinized versus feminized male faces. Consistent with previous studies, women with a low (attractive) WHR had stronger preferences for masculine male faces than did women with a relatively high (unattractive) WHR. This relationship remained significant when controlling for possible effects of BMI. Neither WHR nor BMI predicted perceptions of trustworthiness. These findings present converging evidence for condition-dependent mate preferences in women and suggest that such preferences do not reflect individual differences in the extent to which pro-social traits are ascribed to feminine versus masculine men.",
keywords = "condition-dependent preferences, masculinity, waist–hip ratio, body mass index, attractiveness, trustworthiness, faces",
author = "Smith, {Finlay G} and Jones, {Benedict C} and Welling, {Lisa L W} and Little, {Anthony C} and Jovana Vukovic and Main, {Julie C} and DeBruine, {Lisa M}",
year = "2009",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1016/j.paid.2009.04.022",
language = "English",
volume = "47",
pages = "476--480",
journal = "Personality and Individual Differences",
issn = "0191-8869",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Waist–hip ratio predicts women’s preferences for masculine male faces, but not perceptions of men’s trustworthiness

AU - Smith, Finlay G

AU - Jones, Benedict C

AU - Welling, Lisa L W

AU - Little, Anthony C

AU - Vukovic, Jovana

AU - Main, Julie C

AU - DeBruine, Lisa M

PY - 2009/10

Y1 - 2009/10

N2 - Studies show that attractive women demonstrate stronger preferences for masculine men than relatively unattractive women do. Such condition-dependent preferences may occur because attractive women can more easily offset the costs associated with choosing a masculine partner, such as lack of commitment and less interest in parenting. Alternatively, if masculine men display negative characteristics less to attractive women than to unattractive women, attractive women may perceive masculine men to have more positive personality traits than relatively unattractive women do. We examined how two indices of women’s attractiveness, body mass index (BMI) and waist–hip ratio (WHR), relate to perceptions of both the attractiveness and trustworthiness of masculinized versus feminized male faces. Consistent with previous studies, women with a low (attractive) WHR had stronger preferences for masculine male faces than did women with a relatively high (unattractive) WHR. This relationship remained significant when controlling for possible effects of BMI. Neither WHR nor BMI predicted perceptions of trustworthiness. These findings present converging evidence for condition-dependent mate preferences in women and suggest that such preferences do not reflect individual differences in the extent to which pro-social traits are ascribed to feminine versus masculine men.

AB - Studies show that attractive women demonstrate stronger preferences for masculine men than relatively unattractive women do. Such condition-dependent preferences may occur because attractive women can more easily offset the costs associated with choosing a masculine partner, such as lack of commitment and less interest in parenting. Alternatively, if masculine men display negative characteristics less to attractive women than to unattractive women, attractive women may perceive masculine men to have more positive personality traits than relatively unattractive women do. We examined how two indices of women’s attractiveness, body mass index (BMI) and waist–hip ratio (WHR), relate to perceptions of both the attractiveness and trustworthiness of masculinized versus feminized male faces. Consistent with previous studies, women with a low (attractive) WHR had stronger preferences for masculine male faces than did women with a relatively high (unattractive) WHR. This relationship remained significant when controlling for possible effects of BMI. Neither WHR nor BMI predicted perceptions of trustworthiness. These findings present converging evidence for condition-dependent mate preferences in women and suggest that such preferences do not reflect individual differences in the extent to which pro-social traits are ascribed to feminine versus masculine men.

KW - condition-dependent preferences

KW - masculinity

KW - waist–hip ratio

KW - body mass index

KW - attractiveness

KW - trustworthiness

KW - faces

U2 - 10.1016/j.paid.2009.04.022

DO - 10.1016/j.paid.2009.04.022

M3 - Article

VL - 47

SP - 476

EP - 480

JO - Personality and Individual Differences

JF - Personality and Individual Differences

SN - 0191-8869

IS - 5

ER -