Weber, Geertz, and Ricoeur on Explanation and Interpretation

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

One perennial issue in the study of religion is the relationship between explanation and interpretation. Explanation provides causes. Interpretation provides meanings. The issue is the relationship between causes and meanings, for which rough synonyms are reasons, motives, intentions, and purposes. This article presents three of the most common positions on the relationship: those of Max Weber, Clifford Geertz, and Paul Ricoeur. The aim is not to endorse any of the positions but simply to compare them.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)25-33
Number of pages9
JournalBulletin for the Study of Religion
Volume43
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2014

Fingerprint

Clifford Geertz
Causes
Max Weber
Paul Ricœur
Synonyms
Intentions

Cite this

Weber, Geertz, and Ricoeur on Explanation and Interpretation. / Segal, Robert A.

In: Bulletin for the Study of Religion, Vol. 43, No. 1, 02.2014, p. 25-33.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{39dfc9df679240b2a93fdbcb2b6d8bd0,
title = "Weber, Geertz, and Ricoeur on Explanation and Interpretation",
abstract = "One perennial issue in the study of religion is the relationship between explanation and interpretation. Explanation provides causes. Interpretation provides meanings. The issue is the relationship between causes and meanings, for which rough synonyms are reasons, motives, intentions, and purposes. This article presents three of the most common positions on the relationship: those of Max Weber, Clifford Geertz, and Paul Ricoeur. The aim is not to endorse any of the positions but simply to compare them.",
author = "Segal, {Robert A.}",
year = "2014",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1558/bsor.v43i1.25",
language = "English",
volume = "43",
pages = "25--33",
journal = "Bulletin for the Study of Religion",
issn = "2041-1863",
publisher = "Equinox Publishing",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Weber, Geertz, and Ricoeur on Explanation and Interpretation

AU - Segal, Robert A.

PY - 2014/2

Y1 - 2014/2

N2 - One perennial issue in the study of religion is the relationship between explanation and interpretation. Explanation provides causes. Interpretation provides meanings. The issue is the relationship between causes and meanings, for which rough synonyms are reasons, motives, intentions, and purposes. This article presents three of the most common positions on the relationship: those of Max Weber, Clifford Geertz, and Paul Ricoeur. The aim is not to endorse any of the positions but simply to compare them.

AB - One perennial issue in the study of religion is the relationship between explanation and interpretation. Explanation provides causes. Interpretation provides meanings. The issue is the relationship between causes and meanings, for which rough synonyms are reasons, motives, intentions, and purposes. This article presents three of the most common positions on the relationship: those of Max Weber, Clifford Geertz, and Paul Ricoeur. The aim is not to endorse any of the positions but simply to compare them.

U2 - 10.1558/bsor.v43i1.25

DO - 10.1558/bsor.v43i1.25

M3 - Article

VL - 43

SP - 25

EP - 33

JO - Bulletin for the Study of Religion

JF - Bulletin for the Study of Religion

SN - 2041-1863

IS - 1

ER -