What difference does it make? The calculation of QALY gains from health profiles using patient and general population values

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the Quality-Adjusted Life Year (QALY) values produced from a direct health profile QALY calculation method, using patient values, with those derived from a conventional QALY calculation method, using general population values.

Methods: Comparison of QALY values generated from patient valuations of health profiles, using a chained version of the Time Trade-Off method, with QALY values derived from a conventional QALY calculation method, using general population values of EQ-5D states, an observational survey of MS patients, and a randomized controlled trial.

Results: Using patient valuations of health profiles, QALY values of treatment and placebo were 2.610 and 2.568, respectively, generating a gain of 0.042. The conventional QALY method gave values of 2.042 versus 1.998, producing a gain of 0.044. These findings were generally robust under sensitivity analyses.

Conclusions: QALY values were dependent on the calculation method used, but QALY gains were similar between methods. QALY values from the conventional QALY calculation method appeared robust to most changes in the assumptions used to derive values. The direct health profile QALY method was however more able to account for heterogeneity in preferences. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)321-331
Number of pages11
JournalHealth Policy
Volume84
Issue number2-3
Early online date18 Jun 2007
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2007

Keywords

  • quality of life
  • social values
  • patients
  • health policy
  • quality-adjusted life years
  • cost-benefit analysis
  • adjusted life years
  • multiple-sclerosis
  • individual preferences
  • states
  • utility
  • model
  • sequences
  • outcomes
  • time

Cite this

What difference does it make? The calculation of QALY gains from health profiles using patient and general population values. / McNamee, Paul.

In: Health Policy, Vol. 84, No. 2-3, 12.2007, p. 321-331.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{00c594ffabb24b09a52aee03082ef4c8,
title = "What difference does it make? The calculation of QALY gains from health profiles using patient and general population values",
abstract = "Objectives: To compare the Quality-Adjusted Life Year (QALY) values produced from a direct health profile QALY calculation method, using patient values, with those derived from a conventional QALY calculation method, using general population values.Methods: Comparison of QALY values generated from patient valuations of health profiles, using a chained version of the Time Trade-Off method, with QALY values derived from a conventional QALY calculation method, using general population values of EQ-5D states, an observational survey of MS patients, and a randomized controlled trial.Results: Using patient valuations of health profiles, QALY values of treatment and placebo were 2.610 and 2.568, respectively, generating a gain of 0.042. The conventional QALY method gave values of 2.042 versus 1.998, producing a gain of 0.044. These findings were generally robust under sensitivity analyses.Conclusions: QALY values were dependent on the calculation method used, but QALY gains were similar between methods. QALY values from the conventional QALY calculation method appeared robust to most changes in the assumptions used to derive values. The direct health profile QALY method was however more able to account for heterogeneity in preferences. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.",
keywords = "quality of life, social values, patients, health policy, quality-adjusted life years, cost-benefit analysis, adjusted life years, multiple-sclerosis, individual preferences, states, utility, model, sequences, outcomes, time",
author = "Paul McNamee",
year = "2007",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1016/j.healthpol.2007.05.004",
language = "English",
volume = "84",
pages = "321--331",
journal = "Health Policy",
issn = "0168-8510",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "2-3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - What difference does it make? The calculation of QALY gains from health profiles using patient and general population values

AU - McNamee, Paul

PY - 2007/12

Y1 - 2007/12

N2 - Objectives: To compare the Quality-Adjusted Life Year (QALY) values produced from a direct health profile QALY calculation method, using patient values, with those derived from a conventional QALY calculation method, using general population values.Methods: Comparison of QALY values generated from patient valuations of health profiles, using a chained version of the Time Trade-Off method, with QALY values derived from a conventional QALY calculation method, using general population values of EQ-5D states, an observational survey of MS patients, and a randomized controlled trial.Results: Using patient valuations of health profiles, QALY values of treatment and placebo were 2.610 and 2.568, respectively, generating a gain of 0.042. The conventional QALY method gave values of 2.042 versus 1.998, producing a gain of 0.044. These findings were generally robust under sensitivity analyses.Conclusions: QALY values were dependent on the calculation method used, but QALY gains were similar between methods. QALY values from the conventional QALY calculation method appeared robust to most changes in the assumptions used to derive values. The direct health profile QALY method was however more able to account for heterogeneity in preferences. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

AB - Objectives: To compare the Quality-Adjusted Life Year (QALY) values produced from a direct health profile QALY calculation method, using patient values, with those derived from a conventional QALY calculation method, using general population values.Methods: Comparison of QALY values generated from patient valuations of health profiles, using a chained version of the Time Trade-Off method, with QALY values derived from a conventional QALY calculation method, using general population values of EQ-5D states, an observational survey of MS patients, and a randomized controlled trial.Results: Using patient valuations of health profiles, QALY values of treatment and placebo were 2.610 and 2.568, respectively, generating a gain of 0.042. The conventional QALY method gave values of 2.042 versus 1.998, producing a gain of 0.044. These findings were generally robust under sensitivity analyses.Conclusions: QALY values were dependent on the calculation method used, but QALY gains were similar between methods. QALY values from the conventional QALY calculation method appeared robust to most changes in the assumptions used to derive values. The direct health profile QALY method was however more able to account for heterogeneity in preferences. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

KW - quality of life

KW - social values

KW - patients

KW - health policy

KW - quality-adjusted life years

KW - cost-benefit analysis

KW - adjusted life years

KW - multiple-sclerosis

KW - individual preferences

KW - states

KW - utility

KW - model

KW - sequences

KW - outcomes

KW - time

U2 - 10.1016/j.healthpol.2007.05.004

DO - 10.1016/j.healthpol.2007.05.004

M3 - Article

VL - 84

SP - 321

EP - 331

JO - Health Policy

JF - Health Policy

SN - 0168-8510

IS - 2-3

ER -