What is social learning?

Mark Reed, Anna Clair Evely, Georgina Cundill, Ioan Fazey, Jayne Glass, Adele Laing, Jens Newig, Brad Parrish, Christina Prell, Chris Raymond, Lindsay C. Stringer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

524 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Social learning is increasingly becoming a normative goal in natural resource management and policy. However, there remains little consensus over its meaning or theoretical basis. There are still considerable differences in understanding of the concept in the literature, including a number of articles published in Ecology & Society. Social learning is often conflated with other concepts such as participation and proenvironmental behavior, and there is often little distinction made between individual and wider social learning. Many unsubstantiated claims for social learning exist, and there is frequently confusion between the concept itself and its potential outcomes. This lack of conceptual clarity has limited our capacity to assess whether social learning has occurred, and if so, what kind of learning has taken place, to what extent, between whom, when, and how. This response attempts to provide greater clarity on the conceptual basis for social learning. We argue that to be considered social learning, a process must: (1) demonstrate that a change in understanding has taken place in the individuals involved; (2) demonstrate that this change goes beyond the individual and becomes situated within wider social units or communities of practice; and (3) occur through social interactions and processes between actors within a social network. A clearer picture of what we mean by social learning could enhance our ability to critically evaluate outcomes and better understand the processes through which social learning occurs. In this way, it may be possible to better facilitate the desired outcomes of social learning processes.
Original languageEnglish
Article numberr1
Number of pages10
JournalEcology and Society
Volume15
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Fingerprint

learning
social network
resource management
natural resource
ecology

Keywords

  • definition
  • social-ecological systems
  • social learning

Cite this

Reed, M., Evely, A. C., Cundill, G., Fazey, I., Glass, J., Laing, A., ... Stringer, L. C. (2010). What is social learning? Ecology and Society, 15(4), [r1].

What is social learning? / Reed, Mark; Evely, Anna Clair; Cundill, Georgina; Fazey, Ioan; Glass, Jayne; Laing, Adele; Newig, Jens; Parrish, Brad; Prell, Christina; Raymond, Chris; Stringer, Lindsay C.

In: Ecology and Society, Vol. 15, No. 4, r1, 2010.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Reed, M, Evely, AC, Cundill, G, Fazey, I, Glass, J, Laing, A, Newig, J, Parrish, B, Prell, C, Raymond, C & Stringer, LC 2010, 'What is social learning?' Ecology and Society, vol. 15, no. 4, r1.
Reed M, Evely AC, Cundill G, Fazey I, Glass J, Laing A et al. What is social learning? Ecology and Society. 2010;15(4). r1.
Reed, Mark ; Evely, Anna Clair ; Cundill, Georgina ; Fazey, Ioan ; Glass, Jayne ; Laing, Adele ; Newig, Jens ; Parrish, Brad ; Prell, Christina ; Raymond, Chris ; Stringer, Lindsay C. / What is social learning?. In: Ecology and Society. 2010 ; Vol. 15, No. 4.
@article{4e17b87ec38a4253952a6ec9e7c476f6,
title = "What is social learning?",
abstract = "Social learning is increasingly becoming a normative goal in natural resource management and policy. However, there remains little consensus over its meaning or theoretical basis. There are still considerable differences in understanding of the concept in the literature, including a number of articles published in Ecology & Society. Social learning is often conflated with other concepts such as participation and proenvironmental behavior, and there is often little distinction made between individual and wider social learning. Many unsubstantiated claims for social learning exist, and there is frequently confusion between the concept itself and its potential outcomes. This lack of conceptual clarity has limited our capacity to assess whether social learning has occurred, and if so, what kind of learning has taken place, to what extent, between whom, when, and how. This response attempts to provide greater clarity on the conceptual basis for social learning. We argue that to be considered social learning, a process must: (1) demonstrate that a change in understanding has taken place in the individuals involved; (2) demonstrate that this change goes beyond the individual and becomes situated within wider social units or communities of practice; and (3) occur through social interactions and processes between actors within a social network. A clearer picture of what we mean by social learning could enhance our ability to critically evaluate outcomes and better understand the processes through which social learning occurs. In this way, it may be possible to better facilitate the desired outcomes of social learning processes.",
keywords = "definition, social-ecological systems, social learning",
author = "Mark Reed and Evely, {Anna Clair} and Georgina Cundill and Ioan Fazey and Jayne Glass and Adele Laing and Jens Newig and Brad Parrish and Christina Prell and Chris Raymond and Stringer, {Lindsay C.}",
year = "2010",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
journal = "Ecology and Society",
issn = "1708-3087",
publisher = "The Resilience Alliance",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - What is social learning?

AU - Reed, Mark

AU - Evely, Anna Clair

AU - Cundill, Georgina

AU - Fazey, Ioan

AU - Glass, Jayne

AU - Laing, Adele

AU - Newig, Jens

AU - Parrish, Brad

AU - Prell, Christina

AU - Raymond, Chris

AU - Stringer, Lindsay C.

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - Social learning is increasingly becoming a normative goal in natural resource management and policy. However, there remains little consensus over its meaning or theoretical basis. There are still considerable differences in understanding of the concept in the literature, including a number of articles published in Ecology & Society. Social learning is often conflated with other concepts such as participation and proenvironmental behavior, and there is often little distinction made between individual and wider social learning. Many unsubstantiated claims for social learning exist, and there is frequently confusion between the concept itself and its potential outcomes. This lack of conceptual clarity has limited our capacity to assess whether social learning has occurred, and if so, what kind of learning has taken place, to what extent, between whom, when, and how. This response attempts to provide greater clarity on the conceptual basis for social learning. We argue that to be considered social learning, a process must: (1) demonstrate that a change in understanding has taken place in the individuals involved; (2) demonstrate that this change goes beyond the individual and becomes situated within wider social units or communities of practice; and (3) occur through social interactions and processes between actors within a social network. A clearer picture of what we mean by social learning could enhance our ability to critically evaluate outcomes and better understand the processes through which social learning occurs. In this way, it may be possible to better facilitate the desired outcomes of social learning processes.

AB - Social learning is increasingly becoming a normative goal in natural resource management and policy. However, there remains little consensus over its meaning or theoretical basis. There are still considerable differences in understanding of the concept in the literature, including a number of articles published in Ecology & Society. Social learning is often conflated with other concepts such as participation and proenvironmental behavior, and there is often little distinction made between individual and wider social learning. Many unsubstantiated claims for social learning exist, and there is frequently confusion between the concept itself and its potential outcomes. This lack of conceptual clarity has limited our capacity to assess whether social learning has occurred, and if so, what kind of learning has taken place, to what extent, between whom, when, and how. This response attempts to provide greater clarity on the conceptual basis for social learning. We argue that to be considered social learning, a process must: (1) demonstrate that a change in understanding has taken place in the individuals involved; (2) demonstrate that this change goes beyond the individual and becomes situated within wider social units or communities of practice; and (3) occur through social interactions and processes between actors within a social network. A clearer picture of what we mean by social learning could enhance our ability to critically evaluate outcomes and better understand the processes through which social learning occurs. In this way, it may be possible to better facilitate the desired outcomes of social learning processes.

KW - definition

KW - social-ecological systems

KW - social learning

M3 - Article

VL - 15

JO - Ecology and Society

JF - Ecology and Society

SN - 1708-3087

IS - 4

M1 - r1

ER -