What is the excess risk of infertility in women following genital chlamydia infection? A systematic review of the evidence

LA Wallace , A. Scoular, G Hart, M Reid, P Wilson, DJ Goldberg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To summarise evidence on the attributable risk of infertility after chlamydial infection in women.

Methods: Twelve databases were searched, limited to peer-reviewed literature published from January 1970 to September 2007. Conference abstracts and reference lists from reviews published since 2000 and from key articles were hand-searched. Studies were selected for review if they met the following criteria: (1) the study population comprised women of child-bearing age (defined as 15–45 years) and incorporated a comparison group of women documented as “chlamydia negative”; (2) the study outcomes included either infertility or successful pregnancy; and (3) the study design was one of the following: cohort, randomised controlled trial, “before and after” study, screening trial and systematic review. Studies were excluded if they described genital infections that either did not include Chlamydia trachomatis or described genital chlamydial co-infection, in which no data were available for C trachomatis infection alone.

Results: 3349 studies were identified by the search. One study satisfied the inclusion criteria, a longitudinal investigation measuring pregnancy rates in adolescent women with and without current chlamydial infection at baseline. That study reported no significant difference in subsequent pregnancy rates; however, it had serious methodological limitations, which restricted its conclusions.

Conclusions: This systematic review demonstrates the absence of valid evidence on the attributable risk of post-infective tubal factor infertility after genital chlamydial infection. The findings contribute empirical data to the growing debate surrounding previous assumptions about the natural history of chlamydial infection in women.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)171–175
Number of pages5
JournalSexually Transmitted Infections
Volume84
Issue number3
Early online date30 Nov 2007
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2008

Fingerprint

Chlamydia Infections
Infertility
Infection
Pregnancy Rate
Chlamydia
Chlamydia trachomatis
Coinfection
Randomized Controlled Trials
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Databases
Pregnancy
Population

Cite this

What is the excess risk of infertility in women following genital chlamydia infection? A systematic review of the evidence. / Wallace , LA; Scoular, A.; Hart, G; Reid, M ; Wilson, P; Goldberg , DJ.

In: Sexually Transmitted Infections, Vol. 84, No. 3, 06.2008, p. 171–175.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wallace , LA ; Scoular, A. ; Hart, G ; Reid, M ; Wilson, P ; Goldberg , DJ. / What is the excess risk of infertility in women following genital chlamydia infection? A systematic review of the evidence. In: Sexually Transmitted Infections. 2008 ; Vol. 84, No. 3. pp. 171–175.
@article{964a394093144d29a284c976a2d41f5a,
title = "What is the excess risk of infertility in women following genital chlamydia infection?: A systematic review of the evidence",
abstract = "Objective: To summarise evidence on the attributable risk of infertility after chlamydial infection in women. Methods: Twelve databases were searched, limited to peer-reviewed literature published from January 1970 to September 2007. Conference abstracts and reference lists from reviews published since 2000 and from key articles were hand-searched. Studies were selected for review if they met the following criteria: (1) the study population comprised women of child-bearing age (defined as 15–45 years) and incorporated a comparison group of women documented as “chlamydia negative”; (2) the study outcomes included either infertility or successful pregnancy; and (3) the study design was one of the following: cohort, randomised controlled trial, “before and after” study, screening trial and systematic review. Studies were excluded if they described genital infections that either did not include Chlamydia trachomatis or described genital chlamydial co-infection, in which no data were available for C trachomatis infection alone. Results: 3349 studies were identified by the search. One study satisfied the inclusion criteria, a longitudinal investigation measuring pregnancy rates in adolescent women with and without current chlamydial infection at baseline. That study reported no significant difference in subsequent pregnancy rates; however, it had serious methodological limitations, which restricted its conclusions. Conclusions: This systematic review demonstrates the absence of valid evidence on the attributable risk of post-infective tubal factor infertility after genital chlamydial infection. The findings contribute empirical data to the growing debate surrounding previous assumptions about the natural history of chlamydial infection in women.",
author = "LA Wallace and A. Scoular and G Hart and M Reid and P Wilson and DJ Goldberg",
year = "2008",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1136/sti.2007.026047",
language = "English",
volume = "84",
pages = "171–175",
journal = "Sexually Transmitted Infections",
issn = "1368-4973",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - What is the excess risk of infertility in women following genital chlamydia infection?

T2 - A systematic review of the evidence

AU - Wallace , LA

AU - Scoular, A.

AU - Hart, G

AU - Reid, M

AU - Wilson, P

AU - Goldberg , DJ

PY - 2008/6

Y1 - 2008/6

N2 - Objective: To summarise evidence on the attributable risk of infertility after chlamydial infection in women. Methods: Twelve databases were searched, limited to peer-reviewed literature published from January 1970 to September 2007. Conference abstracts and reference lists from reviews published since 2000 and from key articles were hand-searched. Studies were selected for review if they met the following criteria: (1) the study population comprised women of child-bearing age (defined as 15–45 years) and incorporated a comparison group of women documented as “chlamydia negative”; (2) the study outcomes included either infertility or successful pregnancy; and (3) the study design was one of the following: cohort, randomised controlled trial, “before and after” study, screening trial and systematic review. Studies were excluded if they described genital infections that either did not include Chlamydia trachomatis or described genital chlamydial co-infection, in which no data were available for C trachomatis infection alone. Results: 3349 studies were identified by the search. One study satisfied the inclusion criteria, a longitudinal investigation measuring pregnancy rates in adolescent women with and without current chlamydial infection at baseline. That study reported no significant difference in subsequent pregnancy rates; however, it had serious methodological limitations, which restricted its conclusions. Conclusions: This systematic review demonstrates the absence of valid evidence on the attributable risk of post-infective tubal factor infertility after genital chlamydial infection. The findings contribute empirical data to the growing debate surrounding previous assumptions about the natural history of chlamydial infection in women.

AB - Objective: To summarise evidence on the attributable risk of infertility after chlamydial infection in women. Methods: Twelve databases were searched, limited to peer-reviewed literature published from January 1970 to September 2007. Conference abstracts and reference lists from reviews published since 2000 and from key articles were hand-searched. Studies were selected for review if they met the following criteria: (1) the study population comprised women of child-bearing age (defined as 15–45 years) and incorporated a comparison group of women documented as “chlamydia negative”; (2) the study outcomes included either infertility or successful pregnancy; and (3) the study design was one of the following: cohort, randomised controlled trial, “before and after” study, screening trial and systematic review. Studies were excluded if they described genital infections that either did not include Chlamydia trachomatis or described genital chlamydial co-infection, in which no data were available for C trachomatis infection alone. Results: 3349 studies were identified by the search. One study satisfied the inclusion criteria, a longitudinal investigation measuring pregnancy rates in adolescent women with and without current chlamydial infection at baseline. That study reported no significant difference in subsequent pregnancy rates; however, it had serious methodological limitations, which restricted its conclusions. Conclusions: This systematic review demonstrates the absence of valid evidence on the attributable risk of post-infective tubal factor infertility after genital chlamydial infection. The findings contribute empirical data to the growing debate surrounding previous assumptions about the natural history of chlamydial infection in women.

U2 - 10.1136/sti.2007.026047

DO - 10.1136/sti.2007.026047

M3 - Article

VL - 84

SP - 171

EP - 175

JO - Sexually Transmitted Infections

JF - Sexually Transmitted Infections

SN - 1368-4973

IS - 3

ER -