What makes an expert effective at interpreting seismic images?

C. E. Bond, R. J. Lunn, Z. K. Shipton, A. D. Lunn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

41 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Interpretation of uncertain data is the basis for understanding many Earth processes; in particular, uncertain data underpin much of the world's hydrocarbon exploration and future carbon minimization strategies (CO2 storage and radioactive waste disposal). It is therefore crucial to develop techniques and protocols that will improve geoscientists' interpretational accuracy. We asked 184 academic and industry experts to interpret a typical oil-industry synthetic seismic refl ection data set and found that just over one-third got the "right" answer. Using multivariate analyses we show that interpretational accuracy is signifi cantly improved for experts educated to the level of a Master's degree and/or doctorate (Ph. D.) (regardless of years of experience). Furthermore, although only 18 of 184 experts validated their interpretation by checking geometric and evolutionary feasibility, these experts were almost three times more likely to produce the correct result than those that did not. These results would not have been apparent from traditional detailed expert elicitation studies, as their sample sizes are too small. Our fi ndings strongly suggest that signifi cant improvements in the reliability of interpretations of inherently uncertain geological data sets could be made by increasing the proportion of people recruited into industry and academia who have a Master's or Ph. D. degree, and by changes to industry workfl ows and quality assurance procedures to explicitly include validation techniques.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)75-78
Number of pages4
JournalGeology
Volume40
Issue number1
Early online date14 Nov 2011
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2012

Keywords

  • uncertainty
  • sections
  • system

Cite this

What makes an expert effective at interpreting seismic images? / Bond, C. E.; Lunn, R. J.; Shipton, Z. K.; Lunn, A. D.

In: Geology, Vol. 40, No. 1, 01.2012, p. 75-78.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bond, CE, Lunn, RJ, Shipton, ZK & Lunn, AD 2012, 'What makes an expert effective at interpreting seismic images?' Geology, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 75-78. https://doi.org/10.1130/G32375.1
Bond, C. E. ; Lunn, R. J. ; Shipton, Z. K. ; Lunn, A. D. / What makes an expert effective at interpreting seismic images?. In: Geology. 2012 ; Vol. 40, No. 1. pp. 75-78.
@article{d8cc9b4a40c24b11abf2b702b0b08a84,
title = "What makes an expert effective at interpreting seismic images?",
abstract = "Interpretation of uncertain data is the basis for understanding many Earth processes; in particular, uncertain data underpin much of the world's hydrocarbon exploration and future carbon minimization strategies (CO2 storage and radioactive waste disposal). It is therefore crucial to develop techniques and protocols that will improve geoscientists' interpretational accuracy. We asked 184 academic and industry experts to interpret a typical oil-industry synthetic seismic refl ection data set and found that just over one-third got the {"}right{"} answer. Using multivariate analyses we show that interpretational accuracy is signifi cantly improved for experts educated to the level of a Master's degree and/or doctorate (Ph. D.) (regardless of years of experience). Furthermore, although only 18 of 184 experts validated their interpretation by checking geometric and evolutionary feasibility, these experts were almost three times more likely to produce the correct result than those that did not. These results would not have been apparent from traditional detailed expert elicitation studies, as their sample sizes are too small. Our fi ndings strongly suggest that signifi cant improvements in the reliability of interpretations of inherently uncertain geological data sets could be made by increasing the proportion of people recruited into industry and academia who have a Master's or Ph. D. degree, and by changes to industry workfl ows and quality assurance procedures to explicitly include validation techniques.",
keywords = "uncertainty, sections, system",
author = "Bond, {C. E.} and Lunn, {R. J.} and Shipton, {Z. K.} and Lunn, {A. D.}",
year = "2012",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1130/G32375.1",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "75--78",
journal = "Geology",
issn = "0091-7613",
publisher = "GEOLOGICAL SOC AMER, INC",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - What makes an expert effective at interpreting seismic images?

AU - Bond, C. E.

AU - Lunn, R. J.

AU - Shipton, Z. K.

AU - Lunn, A. D.

PY - 2012/1

Y1 - 2012/1

N2 - Interpretation of uncertain data is the basis for understanding many Earth processes; in particular, uncertain data underpin much of the world's hydrocarbon exploration and future carbon minimization strategies (CO2 storage and radioactive waste disposal). It is therefore crucial to develop techniques and protocols that will improve geoscientists' interpretational accuracy. We asked 184 academic and industry experts to interpret a typical oil-industry synthetic seismic refl ection data set and found that just over one-third got the "right" answer. Using multivariate analyses we show that interpretational accuracy is signifi cantly improved for experts educated to the level of a Master's degree and/or doctorate (Ph. D.) (regardless of years of experience). Furthermore, although only 18 of 184 experts validated their interpretation by checking geometric and evolutionary feasibility, these experts were almost three times more likely to produce the correct result than those that did not. These results would not have been apparent from traditional detailed expert elicitation studies, as their sample sizes are too small. Our fi ndings strongly suggest that signifi cant improvements in the reliability of interpretations of inherently uncertain geological data sets could be made by increasing the proportion of people recruited into industry and academia who have a Master's or Ph. D. degree, and by changes to industry workfl ows and quality assurance procedures to explicitly include validation techniques.

AB - Interpretation of uncertain data is the basis for understanding many Earth processes; in particular, uncertain data underpin much of the world's hydrocarbon exploration and future carbon minimization strategies (CO2 storage and radioactive waste disposal). It is therefore crucial to develop techniques and protocols that will improve geoscientists' interpretational accuracy. We asked 184 academic and industry experts to interpret a typical oil-industry synthetic seismic refl ection data set and found that just over one-third got the "right" answer. Using multivariate analyses we show that interpretational accuracy is signifi cantly improved for experts educated to the level of a Master's degree and/or doctorate (Ph. D.) (regardless of years of experience). Furthermore, although only 18 of 184 experts validated their interpretation by checking geometric and evolutionary feasibility, these experts were almost three times more likely to produce the correct result than those that did not. These results would not have been apparent from traditional detailed expert elicitation studies, as their sample sizes are too small. Our fi ndings strongly suggest that signifi cant improvements in the reliability of interpretations of inherently uncertain geological data sets could be made by increasing the proportion of people recruited into industry and academia who have a Master's or Ph. D. degree, and by changes to industry workfl ows and quality assurance procedures to explicitly include validation techniques.

KW - uncertainty

KW - sections

KW - system

U2 - 10.1130/G32375.1

DO - 10.1130/G32375.1

M3 - Article

VL - 40

SP - 75

EP - 78

JO - Geology

JF - Geology

SN - 0091-7613

IS - 1

ER -