Abstract
The paper explores the issue of personhood within the context of the lives of people with advanced dementia. It frames the issue of personhood theologically as an aspect of naming, emphasising the power of naming for the ways in which we respond to things in the world. If we choose to name dementia in terms of personhood and non-personhood with the value of an individual gauged by their ability to do or not to do certain things then there are dangers. Non-persons lose their value and some suggest lose their right to life. Drawing on the philosophy of Robert Spaemann and the theology of Rowan Williams, this paper offers a counter-response which positions the value of all people as lying in the prevenient love of God.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 234-247 |
Number of pages | 14 |
Journal | International Journal of Practical Theology |
Volume | 18 |
Issue number | 2 |
Early online date | 28 Nov 2014 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 19 Dec 2014 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'What’s in a name? Why people with dementia might be better off without the language of personhood'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Profiles
-
John Swinton
- School of Divinity, History & Philosophy, Centre for Autism and Theology
- School of Divinity, History & Philosophy, Divinity - Chair in Divinity and Religious Studies
- School of Divinity, History & Philosophy, Centre for Spirituality, Health and Disability
Person: Academic