What’s Left in Scandinavia is the Social Democratic Welfare Consensus

David Arter

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    8 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This article profiles the parties of the left in all five Scandinavian countries. It distinguishes the 'Old Parliamentary Left' and the 'Newer Parliamentary Parties of the Left', and analyses various aspects of the traditional dominance of social democracy. It is argued that, paradoxically, although Scandinavian social democracy appears in long-term electoral decline, what is left is the social democratic welfare consensus. This has not been seriously challenged. Instead, the newer parties to the left of the social democrats have made advances at the polls, not by attacking the basic consensus but by attacking the social democrats for appearing to abandon it. The social democrats, it is suggested, have retreated from the 'social democratic model'. It has been this neo-liberalisation of Scandinavian social democracy which has allowed competitor parties to appeal to voters by appropriating a traditional social democratic agenda.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)75-98
    Number of pages23
    JournalParliamentary Affairs
    Volume56
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2003

    Cite this

    What’s Left in Scandinavia is the Social Democratic Welfare Consensus. / Arter, David.

    In: Parliamentary Affairs, Vol. 56, No. 1, 2003, p. 75-98.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{d440006209454cb3a6830a376931de5e,
    title = "What’s Left in Scandinavia is the Social Democratic Welfare Consensus",
    abstract = "This article profiles the parties of the left in all five Scandinavian countries. It distinguishes the 'Old Parliamentary Left' and the 'Newer Parliamentary Parties of the Left', and analyses various aspects of the traditional dominance of social democracy. It is argued that, paradoxically, although Scandinavian social democracy appears in long-term electoral decline, what is left is the social democratic welfare consensus. This has not been seriously challenged. Instead, the newer parties to the left of the social democrats have made advances at the polls, not by attacking the basic consensus but by attacking the social democrats for appearing to abandon it. The social democrats, it is suggested, have retreated from the 'social democratic model'. It has been this neo-liberalisation of Scandinavian social democracy which has allowed competitor parties to appeal to voters by appropriating a traditional social democratic agenda.",
    author = "David Arter",
    year = "2003",
    doi = "10.1093/pa/gsg006",
    language = "English",
    volume = "56",
    pages = "75--98",
    journal = "Parliamentary Affairs",
    issn = "0031-2290",
    publisher = "Oxford University Press",
    number = "1",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - What’s Left in Scandinavia is the Social Democratic Welfare Consensus

    AU - Arter, David

    PY - 2003

    Y1 - 2003

    N2 - This article profiles the parties of the left in all five Scandinavian countries. It distinguishes the 'Old Parliamentary Left' and the 'Newer Parliamentary Parties of the Left', and analyses various aspects of the traditional dominance of social democracy. It is argued that, paradoxically, although Scandinavian social democracy appears in long-term electoral decline, what is left is the social democratic welfare consensus. This has not been seriously challenged. Instead, the newer parties to the left of the social democrats have made advances at the polls, not by attacking the basic consensus but by attacking the social democrats for appearing to abandon it. The social democrats, it is suggested, have retreated from the 'social democratic model'. It has been this neo-liberalisation of Scandinavian social democracy which has allowed competitor parties to appeal to voters by appropriating a traditional social democratic agenda.

    AB - This article profiles the parties of the left in all five Scandinavian countries. It distinguishes the 'Old Parliamentary Left' and the 'Newer Parliamentary Parties of the Left', and analyses various aspects of the traditional dominance of social democracy. It is argued that, paradoxically, although Scandinavian social democracy appears in long-term electoral decline, what is left is the social democratic welfare consensus. This has not been seriously challenged. Instead, the newer parties to the left of the social democrats have made advances at the polls, not by attacking the basic consensus but by attacking the social democrats for appearing to abandon it. The social democrats, it is suggested, have retreated from the 'social democratic model'. It has been this neo-liberalisation of Scandinavian social democracy which has allowed competitor parties to appeal to voters by appropriating a traditional social democratic agenda.

    U2 - 10.1093/pa/gsg006

    DO - 10.1093/pa/gsg006

    M3 - Article

    VL - 56

    SP - 75

    EP - 98

    JO - Parliamentary Affairs

    JF - Parliamentary Affairs

    SN - 0031-2290

    IS - 1

    ER -