When expectancies harm comprehension

Encoding flexibility in impression formation

Rita Jerónimo, Leonel Garcia-Marques, Mário B Ferreira, C. Neil Macrae

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)
4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

We explored the possibility that the encoding flexibility processes postulated by Sherman and colleagues (1998) may also apply to intentional impression formation settings, even when cognitive resources are available to conceptually encode all of the behavioral information regardless of the relation of that information to the initial stereotypical expectancies. Three experiments offer evidence for the lower conceptual fluency for expectancy-incongruent behaviors, compared with congruent behaviors, as well as for the consequences of that difference for impression formation. Experiment 1 shows that incongruent behaviors are perceived as more difficult to understand in meaning. Experiment 2 links this lower conceptual fluency with a better discrimination of the specific trait implications of the behaviors. We further explore the role of conceptual encoding difficulty for developing personality impressions (Experiment 3). These studies reveal the implications of initial expectancies for the differential conceptual encoding of congruent and incongruent behaviors, even when the availability of cognitive resources is high, such as when forming an intentional impression about a person's personality. The link between this process and encoding the trait implications of behaviors may shed new light on impression formation processes and demand a revision of some of the assumptions that were made by the classical person memory model. We contend that behavior encoding in impression formation is likely to begin with default trait encoding but will be inhibited when the implications of the behavior conflict with previous trait expectancies (see also Wigboldus, Dijksterhuis, & van Knippenberg, 2003).
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)110-119
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Experimental Social Psychology
Volume61
Early online date31 Jul 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2015

Fingerprint

attitude formation
comprehension
flexibility
experiment
personality
Personality
conflict behavior
human being
resources
discrimination
demand

Keywords

  • encoding flexibility
  • impression formation
  • trait inferences
  • expectancies

Cite this

When expectancies harm comprehension : Encoding flexibility in impression formation. / Jerónimo, Rita ; Garcia-Marques, Leonel; Ferreira, Mário B ; Macrae, C. Neil.

In: Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 61, 11.2015, p. 110-119.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Jerónimo, Rita ; Garcia-Marques, Leonel ; Ferreira, Mário B ; Macrae, C. Neil. / When expectancies harm comprehension : Encoding flexibility in impression formation. In: Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2015 ; Vol. 61. pp. 110-119.
@article{953202c3e0014408b6bb61d70cb13bfb,
title = "When expectancies harm comprehension: Encoding flexibility in impression formation",
abstract = "We explored the possibility that the encoding flexibility processes postulated by Sherman and colleagues (1998) may also apply to intentional impression formation settings, even when cognitive resources are available to conceptually encode all of the behavioral information regardless of the relation of that information to the initial stereotypical expectancies. Three experiments offer evidence for the lower conceptual fluency for expectancy-incongruent behaviors, compared with congruent behaviors, as well as for the consequences of that difference for impression formation. Experiment 1 shows that incongruent behaviors are perceived as more difficult to understand in meaning. Experiment 2 links this lower conceptual fluency with a better discrimination of the specific trait implications of the behaviors. We further explore the role of conceptual encoding difficulty for developing personality impressions (Experiment 3). These studies reveal the implications of initial expectancies for the differential conceptual encoding of congruent and incongruent behaviors, even when the availability of cognitive resources is high, such as when forming an intentional impression about a person's personality. The link between this process and encoding the trait implications of behaviors may shed new light on impression formation processes and demand a revision of some of the assumptions that were made by the classical person memory model. We contend that behavior encoding in impression formation is likely to begin with default trait encoding but will be inhibited when the implications of the behavior conflict with previous trait expectancies (see also Wigboldus, Dijksterhuis, & van Knippenberg, 2003).",
keywords = "encoding flexibility, impression formation, trait inferences, expectancies",
author = "Rita Jer{\'o}nimo and Leonel Garcia-Marques and Ferreira, {M{\'a}rio B} and Macrae, {C. Neil}",
year = "2015",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1016/j.jesp.2015.07.007",
language = "English",
volume = "61",
pages = "110--119",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Social Psychology",
issn = "0022-1031",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - When expectancies harm comprehension

T2 - Encoding flexibility in impression formation

AU - Jerónimo, Rita

AU - Garcia-Marques, Leonel

AU - Ferreira, Mário B

AU - Macrae, C. Neil

PY - 2015/11

Y1 - 2015/11

N2 - We explored the possibility that the encoding flexibility processes postulated by Sherman and colleagues (1998) may also apply to intentional impression formation settings, even when cognitive resources are available to conceptually encode all of the behavioral information regardless of the relation of that information to the initial stereotypical expectancies. Three experiments offer evidence for the lower conceptual fluency for expectancy-incongruent behaviors, compared with congruent behaviors, as well as for the consequences of that difference for impression formation. Experiment 1 shows that incongruent behaviors are perceived as more difficult to understand in meaning. Experiment 2 links this lower conceptual fluency with a better discrimination of the specific trait implications of the behaviors. We further explore the role of conceptual encoding difficulty for developing personality impressions (Experiment 3). These studies reveal the implications of initial expectancies for the differential conceptual encoding of congruent and incongruent behaviors, even when the availability of cognitive resources is high, such as when forming an intentional impression about a person's personality. The link between this process and encoding the trait implications of behaviors may shed new light on impression formation processes and demand a revision of some of the assumptions that were made by the classical person memory model. We contend that behavior encoding in impression formation is likely to begin with default trait encoding but will be inhibited when the implications of the behavior conflict with previous trait expectancies (see also Wigboldus, Dijksterhuis, & van Knippenberg, 2003).

AB - We explored the possibility that the encoding flexibility processes postulated by Sherman and colleagues (1998) may also apply to intentional impression formation settings, even when cognitive resources are available to conceptually encode all of the behavioral information regardless of the relation of that information to the initial stereotypical expectancies. Three experiments offer evidence for the lower conceptual fluency for expectancy-incongruent behaviors, compared with congruent behaviors, as well as for the consequences of that difference for impression formation. Experiment 1 shows that incongruent behaviors are perceived as more difficult to understand in meaning. Experiment 2 links this lower conceptual fluency with a better discrimination of the specific trait implications of the behaviors. We further explore the role of conceptual encoding difficulty for developing personality impressions (Experiment 3). These studies reveal the implications of initial expectancies for the differential conceptual encoding of congruent and incongruent behaviors, even when the availability of cognitive resources is high, such as when forming an intentional impression about a person's personality. The link between this process and encoding the trait implications of behaviors may shed new light on impression formation processes and demand a revision of some of the assumptions that were made by the classical person memory model. We contend that behavior encoding in impression formation is likely to begin with default trait encoding but will be inhibited when the implications of the behavior conflict with previous trait expectancies (see also Wigboldus, Dijksterhuis, & van Knippenberg, 2003).

KW - encoding flexibility

KW - impression formation

KW - trait inferences

KW - expectancies

U2 - 10.1016/j.jesp.2015.07.007

DO - 10.1016/j.jesp.2015.07.007

M3 - Article

VL - 61

SP - 110

EP - 119

JO - Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

SN - 0022-1031

ER -