Which chick is tasty to parasites? The importance of host immunology vs. parasite life history

A Roulin*, MWG Brinkhof, P Bize, H Richner, TW Jungi, C Bavoux, N Boileau, G Burneleau

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

68 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

1. The Tasty Chick Hypothesis (TCH) proposes that hatching asynchrony evolved as an antiparasite strategy. Hosts would benefit if ectoparasites aggregate more on the offspring that are of lowest reproductive value within a brood, i.e. on the last-hatched chicks, because offspring reproductive value generally decreases with hatching rank. The poor body condition of the later-hatched chicks would impair parasite resistance and render them especially attractive to ectoparasites. Thus, the TCH predicts a decline in chick parasite load with hatching order in avian broods.

2. We investigated the main assumption of the TCH that junior chicks are less immunocompetent than their senior siblings. We also examine the prediction of the TCH that junior chicks bear more ectoparasites than their senior siblings.

3. Conform to the assumption of the TCH for hosts, junior chicks in broods of the barn owl (Tyto alba L.) showed a lower humoral immune response than their senior siblings. In contrast, the cell-mediated immune response of senior chicks in broods of the great tit (Parus major L.) was not significantly greater than that of their junior siblings.

4. In line with the prediction of the TCH for the distribution of parasites among hosts, the fly Carnus haemapterus Nitzsch infested junior chicks in larger numbers than senior chicks in both barn owl and kestrel (Falco tinnunculus L.) broods.

5. In conflict with the TCH, ticks (Ixodes ricinus L.) were distributed randomly with respect to hatching rank in broods of the barn owl and the great tit. Moreover, louse-flies Crataerina melbae Rondani infested mainly senior chicks instead of junior chicks in the Alpine swift (Apus melba L.).

6. Summarizing, the present descriptive study indicates that the distribution of ectoparasites within-broods is not generally governed by rank-related variation in host defence of chicks as initially suggested by the TCH. We argue that specific aspects of the morphology, life history and ecological requirements of various ectoparasite species need more consideration as to explain the dynamics and evolution of host-parasite interactions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)75-81
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Animal Ecology
Volume72
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2003

Keywords

  • age hierarchy
  • ectoparasites
  • hatching asynchrony
  • host defence
  • immunocompetence
  • Tasty Chick Hypothesis
  • CARNUS-HEMAPTERUS DIPTERA
  • HATCHING ASYNCHRONY
  • GREAT TITS
  • IMMUNOCOMPETENCE
  • TICKS
  • BIRDS
  • ECTOPARASITE
  • REPRODUCTION
  • SWALLOWS
  • CARNIDAE

Cite this

Roulin, A., Brinkhof, MWG., Bize, P., Richner, H., Jungi, TW., Bavoux, C., ... Burneleau, G. (2003). Which chick is tasty to parasites? The importance of host immunology vs. parasite life history. Journal of Animal Ecology, 72(1), 75-81.

Which chick is tasty to parasites? The importance of host immunology vs. parasite life history. / Roulin, A; Brinkhof, MWG; Bize, P; Richner, H; Jungi, TW; Bavoux, C; Boileau, N; Burneleau, G.

In: Journal of Animal Ecology, Vol. 72, No. 1, 01.2003, p. 75-81.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Roulin, A, Brinkhof, MWG, Bize, P, Richner, H, Jungi, TW, Bavoux, C, Boileau, N & Burneleau, G 2003, 'Which chick is tasty to parasites? The importance of host immunology vs. parasite life history', Journal of Animal Ecology, vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 75-81.
Roulin A, Brinkhof MWG, Bize P, Richner H, Jungi TW, Bavoux C et al. Which chick is tasty to parasites? The importance of host immunology vs. parasite life history. Journal of Animal Ecology. 2003 Jan;72(1):75-81.
Roulin, A ; Brinkhof, MWG ; Bize, P ; Richner, H ; Jungi, TW ; Bavoux, C ; Boileau, N ; Burneleau, G. / Which chick is tasty to parasites? The importance of host immunology vs. parasite life history. In: Journal of Animal Ecology. 2003 ; Vol. 72, No. 1. pp. 75-81.
@article{80389586745942649e9d6ddaf1c1492b,
title = "Which chick is tasty to parasites? The importance of host immunology vs. parasite life history",
abstract = "1. The Tasty Chick Hypothesis (TCH) proposes that hatching asynchrony evolved as an antiparasite strategy. Hosts would benefit if ectoparasites aggregate more on the offspring that are of lowest reproductive value within a brood, i.e. on the last-hatched chicks, because offspring reproductive value generally decreases with hatching rank. The poor body condition of the later-hatched chicks would impair parasite resistance and render them especially attractive to ectoparasites. Thus, the TCH predicts a decline in chick parasite load with hatching order in avian broods.2. We investigated the main assumption of the TCH that junior chicks are less immunocompetent than their senior siblings. We also examine the prediction of the TCH that junior chicks bear more ectoparasites than their senior siblings.3. Conform to the assumption of the TCH for hosts, junior chicks in broods of the barn owl (Tyto alba L.) showed a lower humoral immune response than their senior siblings. In contrast, the cell-mediated immune response of senior chicks in broods of the great tit (Parus major L.) was not significantly greater than that of their junior siblings.4. In line with the prediction of the TCH for the distribution of parasites among hosts, the fly Carnus haemapterus Nitzsch infested junior chicks in larger numbers than senior chicks in both barn owl and kestrel (Falco tinnunculus L.) broods.5. In conflict with the TCH, ticks (Ixodes ricinus L.) were distributed randomly with respect to hatching rank in broods of the barn owl and the great tit. Moreover, louse-flies Crataerina melbae Rondani infested mainly senior chicks instead of junior chicks in the Alpine swift (Apus melba L.).6. Summarizing, the present descriptive study indicates that the distribution of ectoparasites within-broods is not generally governed by rank-related variation in host defence of chicks as initially suggested by the TCH. We argue that specific aspects of the morphology, life history and ecological requirements of various ectoparasite species need more consideration as to explain the dynamics and evolution of host-parasite interactions.",
keywords = "age hierarchy, ectoparasites, hatching asynchrony, host defence, immunocompetence, Tasty Chick Hypothesis, CARNUS-HEMAPTERUS DIPTERA, HATCHING ASYNCHRONY, GREAT TITS, IMMUNOCOMPETENCE, TICKS, BIRDS, ECTOPARASITE, REPRODUCTION, SWALLOWS, CARNIDAE",
author = "A Roulin and MWG Brinkhof and P Bize and H Richner and TW Jungi and C Bavoux and N Boileau and G Burneleau",
year = "2003",
month = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "72",
pages = "75--81",
journal = "Journal of Animal Ecology",
issn = "0021-8790",
publisher = "BLACKWELL PUBLISHING LTD",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Which chick is tasty to parasites? The importance of host immunology vs. parasite life history

AU - Roulin, A

AU - Brinkhof, MWG

AU - Bize, P

AU - Richner, H

AU - Jungi, TW

AU - Bavoux, C

AU - Boileau, N

AU - Burneleau, G

PY - 2003/1

Y1 - 2003/1

N2 - 1. The Tasty Chick Hypothesis (TCH) proposes that hatching asynchrony evolved as an antiparasite strategy. Hosts would benefit if ectoparasites aggregate more on the offspring that are of lowest reproductive value within a brood, i.e. on the last-hatched chicks, because offspring reproductive value generally decreases with hatching rank. The poor body condition of the later-hatched chicks would impair parasite resistance and render them especially attractive to ectoparasites. Thus, the TCH predicts a decline in chick parasite load with hatching order in avian broods.2. We investigated the main assumption of the TCH that junior chicks are less immunocompetent than their senior siblings. We also examine the prediction of the TCH that junior chicks bear more ectoparasites than their senior siblings.3. Conform to the assumption of the TCH for hosts, junior chicks in broods of the barn owl (Tyto alba L.) showed a lower humoral immune response than their senior siblings. In contrast, the cell-mediated immune response of senior chicks in broods of the great tit (Parus major L.) was not significantly greater than that of their junior siblings.4. In line with the prediction of the TCH for the distribution of parasites among hosts, the fly Carnus haemapterus Nitzsch infested junior chicks in larger numbers than senior chicks in both barn owl and kestrel (Falco tinnunculus L.) broods.5. In conflict with the TCH, ticks (Ixodes ricinus L.) were distributed randomly with respect to hatching rank in broods of the barn owl and the great tit. Moreover, louse-flies Crataerina melbae Rondani infested mainly senior chicks instead of junior chicks in the Alpine swift (Apus melba L.).6. Summarizing, the present descriptive study indicates that the distribution of ectoparasites within-broods is not generally governed by rank-related variation in host defence of chicks as initially suggested by the TCH. We argue that specific aspects of the morphology, life history and ecological requirements of various ectoparasite species need more consideration as to explain the dynamics and evolution of host-parasite interactions.

AB - 1. The Tasty Chick Hypothesis (TCH) proposes that hatching asynchrony evolved as an antiparasite strategy. Hosts would benefit if ectoparasites aggregate more on the offspring that are of lowest reproductive value within a brood, i.e. on the last-hatched chicks, because offspring reproductive value generally decreases with hatching rank. The poor body condition of the later-hatched chicks would impair parasite resistance and render them especially attractive to ectoparasites. Thus, the TCH predicts a decline in chick parasite load with hatching order in avian broods.2. We investigated the main assumption of the TCH that junior chicks are less immunocompetent than their senior siblings. We also examine the prediction of the TCH that junior chicks bear more ectoparasites than their senior siblings.3. Conform to the assumption of the TCH for hosts, junior chicks in broods of the barn owl (Tyto alba L.) showed a lower humoral immune response than their senior siblings. In contrast, the cell-mediated immune response of senior chicks in broods of the great tit (Parus major L.) was not significantly greater than that of their junior siblings.4. In line with the prediction of the TCH for the distribution of parasites among hosts, the fly Carnus haemapterus Nitzsch infested junior chicks in larger numbers than senior chicks in both barn owl and kestrel (Falco tinnunculus L.) broods.5. In conflict with the TCH, ticks (Ixodes ricinus L.) were distributed randomly with respect to hatching rank in broods of the barn owl and the great tit. Moreover, louse-flies Crataerina melbae Rondani infested mainly senior chicks instead of junior chicks in the Alpine swift (Apus melba L.).6. Summarizing, the present descriptive study indicates that the distribution of ectoparasites within-broods is not generally governed by rank-related variation in host defence of chicks as initially suggested by the TCH. We argue that specific aspects of the morphology, life history and ecological requirements of various ectoparasite species need more consideration as to explain the dynamics and evolution of host-parasite interactions.

KW - age hierarchy

KW - ectoparasites

KW - hatching asynchrony

KW - host defence

KW - immunocompetence

KW - Tasty Chick Hypothesis

KW - CARNUS-HEMAPTERUS DIPTERA

KW - HATCHING ASYNCHRONY

KW - GREAT TITS

KW - IMMUNOCOMPETENCE

KW - TICKS

KW - BIRDS

KW - ECTOPARASITE

KW - REPRODUCTION

KW - SWALLOWS

KW - CARNIDAE

M3 - Article

VL - 72

SP - 75

EP - 81

JO - Journal of Animal Ecology

JF - Journal of Animal Ecology

SN - 0021-8790

IS - 1

ER -