Which experiences of health care delivery matter to service users and why? A critical interpretive synthesis and conceptual map

Vikki Ann Entwistle, Danielle Firnigl, Mandy Ryan, Jillian Joy Francis, Philip Kinghorn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

62 Citations (Scopus)
2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Patients' experiences are often treated as health care quality indicators. Our aim was to identify the range of experiences of health care delivery that matter to patients and to produce a conceptual map to facilitate consideration of why they matter. METHODS: Broad-based review and critical interpretive synthesis of research literature on patients' perspectives of health care delivery. We recorded experiences reported by a diverse range of patients on 'concept cards', considered why they were important, and explored various ways of organizing them, including internationally recognized health care quality frameworks. We developed a conceptual map that we refined with feedback from stakeholders. RESULTS: Patients identify many health care experiences as important. Existing health care quality frameworks do not cover them all. Our conceptual map presents a rich array of experiences, including health care relationships (beyond communication) and their implications for people's valued capabilities (e.g. to feel respected, contribute to their care, experience reciprocity). It is organized to reflect our synthesis argument, which links health care delivery to what people are enabled (or not) to feel, be and do. The map highlights the broad implications of the social dynamics of health care delivery. Experiences are labelled from a patient's perspective, rendering the importance of responsiveness to individuals axiomatic. CONCLUSIONS: Our conceptual map identifies and helps explain the importance of diverse experiences of health care delivery. It challenges and helps policy-makers, service providers and researchers to attend to the range of experiences that matter, and to take seriously the need for responsiveness to individuals.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)70-78
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Health Services Research & Policy
Volume17
Issue number2
Early online date3 Oct 2011
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2012

Fingerprint

Delivery of Health Care
Quality of Health Care
Health Care Quality Indicators
Administrative Personnel
Communication
Research Personnel
Research

Cite this

Which experiences of health care delivery matter to service users and why? A critical interpretive synthesis and conceptual map. / Entwistle, Vikki Ann; Firnigl, Danielle; Ryan, Mandy; Francis, Jillian Joy; Kinghorn, Philip.

In: Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, Vol. 17, No. 2, 04.2012, p. 70-78.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Entwistle, Vikki Ann ; Firnigl, Danielle ; Ryan, Mandy ; Francis, Jillian Joy ; Kinghorn, Philip. / Which experiences of health care delivery matter to service users and why? A critical interpretive synthesis and conceptual map. In: Journal of Health Services Research & Policy. 2012 ; Vol. 17, No. 2. pp. 70-78.
@article{65c3ea2ae28c41b0bacc5a6a6906b06d,
title = "Which experiences of health care delivery matter to service users and why?: A critical interpretive synthesis and conceptual map",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: Patients' experiences are often treated as health care quality indicators. Our aim was to identify the range of experiences of health care delivery that matter to patients and to produce a conceptual map to facilitate consideration of why they matter. METHODS: Broad-based review and critical interpretive synthesis of research literature on patients' perspectives of health care delivery. We recorded experiences reported by a diverse range of patients on 'concept cards', considered why they were important, and explored various ways of organizing them, including internationally recognized health care quality frameworks. We developed a conceptual map that we refined with feedback from stakeholders. RESULTS: Patients identify many health care experiences as important. Existing health care quality frameworks do not cover them all. Our conceptual map presents a rich array of experiences, including health care relationships (beyond communication) and their implications for people's valued capabilities (e.g. to feel respected, contribute to their care, experience reciprocity). It is organized to reflect our synthesis argument, which links health care delivery to what people are enabled (or not) to feel, be and do. The map highlights the broad implications of the social dynamics of health care delivery. Experiences are labelled from a patient's perspective, rendering the importance of responsiveness to individuals axiomatic. CONCLUSIONS: Our conceptual map identifies and helps explain the importance of diverse experiences of health care delivery. It challenges and helps policy-makers, service providers and researchers to attend to the range of experiences that matter, and to take seriously the need for responsiveness to individuals.",
author = "Entwistle, {Vikki Ann} and Danielle Firnigl and Mandy Ryan and Francis, {Jillian Joy} and Philip Kinghorn",
year = "2012",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1258/jhsrp.2011.011029",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "70--78",
journal = "Journal of Health Services Research & Policy",
issn = "1355-8196",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Which experiences of health care delivery matter to service users and why?

T2 - A critical interpretive synthesis and conceptual map

AU - Entwistle, Vikki Ann

AU - Firnigl, Danielle

AU - Ryan, Mandy

AU - Francis, Jillian Joy

AU - Kinghorn, Philip

PY - 2012/4

Y1 - 2012/4

N2 - OBJECTIVE: Patients' experiences are often treated as health care quality indicators. Our aim was to identify the range of experiences of health care delivery that matter to patients and to produce a conceptual map to facilitate consideration of why they matter. METHODS: Broad-based review and critical interpretive synthesis of research literature on patients' perspectives of health care delivery. We recorded experiences reported by a diverse range of patients on 'concept cards', considered why they were important, and explored various ways of organizing them, including internationally recognized health care quality frameworks. We developed a conceptual map that we refined with feedback from stakeholders. RESULTS: Patients identify many health care experiences as important. Existing health care quality frameworks do not cover them all. Our conceptual map presents a rich array of experiences, including health care relationships (beyond communication) and their implications for people's valued capabilities (e.g. to feel respected, contribute to their care, experience reciprocity). It is organized to reflect our synthesis argument, which links health care delivery to what people are enabled (or not) to feel, be and do. The map highlights the broad implications of the social dynamics of health care delivery. Experiences are labelled from a patient's perspective, rendering the importance of responsiveness to individuals axiomatic. CONCLUSIONS: Our conceptual map identifies and helps explain the importance of diverse experiences of health care delivery. It challenges and helps policy-makers, service providers and researchers to attend to the range of experiences that matter, and to take seriously the need for responsiveness to individuals.

AB - OBJECTIVE: Patients' experiences are often treated as health care quality indicators. Our aim was to identify the range of experiences of health care delivery that matter to patients and to produce a conceptual map to facilitate consideration of why they matter. METHODS: Broad-based review and critical interpretive synthesis of research literature on patients' perspectives of health care delivery. We recorded experiences reported by a diverse range of patients on 'concept cards', considered why they were important, and explored various ways of organizing them, including internationally recognized health care quality frameworks. We developed a conceptual map that we refined with feedback from stakeholders. RESULTS: Patients identify many health care experiences as important. Existing health care quality frameworks do not cover them all. Our conceptual map presents a rich array of experiences, including health care relationships (beyond communication) and their implications for people's valued capabilities (e.g. to feel respected, contribute to their care, experience reciprocity). It is organized to reflect our synthesis argument, which links health care delivery to what people are enabled (or not) to feel, be and do. The map highlights the broad implications of the social dynamics of health care delivery. Experiences are labelled from a patient's perspective, rendering the importance of responsiveness to individuals axiomatic. CONCLUSIONS: Our conceptual map identifies and helps explain the importance of diverse experiences of health care delivery. It challenges and helps policy-makers, service providers and researchers to attend to the range of experiences that matter, and to take seriously the need for responsiveness to individuals.

U2 - 10.1258/jhsrp.2011.011029

DO - 10.1258/jhsrp.2011.011029

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 70

EP - 78

JO - Journal of Health Services Research & Policy

JF - Journal of Health Services Research & Policy

SN - 1355-8196

IS - 2

ER -