Who acquires whom among stand-alone commercial banks and bank holding company affiliates?

Kim Cuong Ly, Frank Hong Liu, Kwaku Opong

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper presents the difference in the likelihood of being targets or acquirers among stand-alone banks, single-bank holding company (SBHC) affiliates and multi-bank holding company (MBHC) affiliates. Using a sample of U.S. commercial bank data from 1997 to 2012, we find that MBHC affiliates exhibit a greater likelihood of being targets than do stand-alone commercial banks, while stand-alone banks have a greater probability of becoming targets than do SBHC affiliates. Our findings show that MBHC affiliates tend to have a greater likelihood of being acquirers than do SBHC affiliates, which again have a greater probability of being acquirers than do stand-alone banks. Those banks that acquire another bank within the same MBHC structure tend to be smaller and more financially constrained than those banks acquiring outside the same MBHC structure, whereas targets that are acquired by another bank within the same MBHC structure tend to be smaller, higher profitability and capital than targets that are acquired by banks from outside the MBHC structure. Our results suggest that the MBHC parent attempts to discipline distressed, poorly performing and smaller affiliates by involving them in mergers and acquisitions.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)144-158
Number of pages15
JournalInternational Review of Financial Analysis
Volume54
Early online date15 Nov 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2017

    Fingerprint

Keywords

  • merger
  • acquisition
  • bank holding company affiliates
  • stand-alone commercial banks

Cite this