Why do people present late with advanced glaucoma?

A qualitative interview study

Maria Prior, Jill J Francis, Augusto Azuara-Blanco, Nitin Anand, Jennifer M Burr, Glaucoma screening Platform Study group

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)
4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Objective To explore the presentation behaviours and pathways to detection of adults who first presented to UK hospital eye services with severe glaucoma.

Design Semistructured interviews, based on models of diagnostic delay, to obtain a descriptive self-reported account of when and how participants’ glaucoma was detected.

Results 11 patients participated (five in Aberdeen, six in Huddersfield). Four participants reported that the optometry appointment at which their glaucoma was detected was their first ever eye test or their first for over 10 years. Seven participants reported attending regular routine optometrist appointments. Their self-reported experiences and pathways to detection describe a variety of missed detection opportunities and delayed referral and treatment.

Conclusions The qualitative data suggest that late detection of glaucoma can result from delays at the patient level but, although based on a small sample, delays also occurred at the healthcare provider (system) level both in terms of accuracy of case detection and effective referral. We suggest that current attempts to address the significant burden of over-referral of glaucoma suspects to hospital eye services (a large proportion of which are false positives) must also focus on the issue of false negatives and on reducing missed detection and service delays.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1574-1578
Number of pages5
JournalBritish Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume97
Issue number12
Early online date24 Sep 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2013

Fingerprint

Glaucoma
Interviews
Referral and Consultation
Appointments and Schedules
Optometry
Ocular Hypertension
Health Personnel
Delivery of Health Care
Therapeutics

Cite this

Prior, M., Francis, J. J., Azuara-Blanco, A., Anand, N., Burr, J. M., & Glaucoma screening Platform Study group (2013). Why do people present late with advanced glaucoma? A qualitative interview study. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 97(12), 1574-1578. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-303813

Why do people present late with advanced glaucoma? A qualitative interview study. / Prior, Maria; Francis, Jill J; Azuara-Blanco, Augusto; Anand, Nitin; Burr, Jennifer M; Glaucoma screening Platform Study group.

In: British Journal of Ophthalmology, Vol. 97, No. 12, 12.2013, p. 1574-1578.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Prior, M, Francis, JJ, Azuara-Blanco, A, Anand, N, Burr, JM & Glaucoma screening Platform Study group 2013, 'Why do people present late with advanced glaucoma? A qualitative interview study', British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 97, no. 12, pp. 1574-1578. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-303813
Prior M, Francis JJ, Azuara-Blanco A, Anand N, Burr JM, Glaucoma screening Platform Study group. Why do people present late with advanced glaucoma? A qualitative interview study. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 2013 Dec;97(12):1574-1578. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-303813
Prior, Maria ; Francis, Jill J ; Azuara-Blanco, Augusto ; Anand, Nitin ; Burr, Jennifer M ; Glaucoma screening Platform Study group. / Why do people present late with advanced glaucoma? A qualitative interview study. In: British Journal of Ophthalmology. 2013 ; Vol. 97, No. 12. pp. 1574-1578.
@article{00766d58d9194d84b637f62a2391f7bf,
title = "Why do people present late with advanced glaucoma?: A qualitative interview study",
abstract = "Objective To explore the presentation behaviours and pathways to detection of adults who first presented to UK hospital eye services with severe glaucoma.Design Semistructured interviews, based on models of diagnostic delay, to obtain a descriptive self-reported account of when and how participants’ glaucoma was detected.Results 11 patients participated (five in Aberdeen, six in Huddersfield). Four participants reported that the optometry appointment at which their glaucoma was detected was their first ever eye test or their first for over 10 years. Seven participants reported attending regular routine optometrist appointments. Their self-reported experiences and pathways to detection describe a variety of missed detection opportunities and delayed referral and treatment.Conclusions The qualitative data suggest that late detection of glaucoma can result from delays at the patient level but, although based on a small sample, delays also occurred at the healthcare provider (system) level both in terms of accuracy of case detection and effective referral. We suggest that current attempts to address the significant burden of over-referral of glaucoma suspects to hospital eye services (a large proportion of which are false positives) must also focus on the issue of false negatives and on reducing missed detection and service delays.",
author = "Maria Prior and Francis, {Jill J} and Augusto Azuara-Blanco and Nitin Anand and Burr, {Jennifer M} and {Glaucoma screening Platform Study group}",
year = "2013",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-303813",
language = "English",
volume = "97",
pages = "1574--1578",
journal = "British Journal of Ophthalmology",
issn = "0007-1161",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Why do people present late with advanced glaucoma?

T2 - A qualitative interview study

AU - Prior, Maria

AU - Francis, Jill J

AU - Azuara-Blanco, Augusto

AU - Anand, Nitin

AU - Burr, Jennifer M

AU - Glaucoma screening Platform Study group

PY - 2013/12

Y1 - 2013/12

N2 - Objective To explore the presentation behaviours and pathways to detection of adults who first presented to UK hospital eye services with severe glaucoma.Design Semistructured interviews, based on models of diagnostic delay, to obtain a descriptive self-reported account of when and how participants’ glaucoma was detected.Results 11 patients participated (five in Aberdeen, six in Huddersfield). Four participants reported that the optometry appointment at which their glaucoma was detected was their first ever eye test or their first for over 10 years. Seven participants reported attending regular routine optometrist appointments. Their self-reported experiences and pathways to detection describe a variety of missed detection opportunities and delayed referral and treatment.Conclusions The qualitative data suggest that late detection of glaucoma can result from delays at the patient level but, although based on a small sample, delays also occurred at the healthcare provider (system) level both in terms of accuracy of case detection and effective referral. We suggest that current attempts to address the significant burden of over-referral of glaucoma suspects to hospital eye services (a large proportion of which are false positives) must also focus on the issue of false negatives and on reducing missed detection and service delays.

AB - Objective To explore the presentation behaviours and pathways to detection of adults who first presented to UK hospital eye services with severe glaucoma.Design Semistructured interviews, based on models of diagnostic delay, to obtain a descriptive self-reported account of when and how participants’ glaucoma was detected.Results 11 patients participated (five in Aberdeen, six in Huddersfield). Four participants reported that the optometry appointment at which their glaucoma was detected was their first ever eye test or their first for over 10 years. Seven participants reported attending regular routine optometrist appointments. Their self-reported experiences and pathways to detection describe a variety of missed detection opportunities and delayed referral and treatment.Conclusions The qualitative data suggest that late detection of glaucoma can result from delays at the patient level but, although based on a small sample, delays also occurred at the healthcare provider (system) level both in terms of accuracy of case detection and effective referral. We suggest that current attempts to address the significant burden of over-referral of glaucoma suspects to hospital eye services (a large proportion of which are false positives) must also focus on the issue of false negatives and on reducing missed detection and service delays.

U2 - 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-303813

DO - 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-303813

M3 - Article

VL - 97

SP - 1574

EP - 1578

JO - British Journal of Ophthalmology

JF - British Journal of Ophthalmology

SN - 0007-1161

IS - 12

ER -