William Robertson Smith: Sociologist or Theologian?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

William Robertson Smith is often considered to be the first modern sociologist of religion. I argue that Smith was truly a pioneering sociologist of religion, but of “primitive” and ancient religion only. He pitted primitive and ancient religion against modern religion, which for him was religion of the individual rather than of the group. I suggest that Smith's sociologising of religion, as revolutionary as it was, stops short. Where his sociology ends, his theology begins.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)9-24
Number of pages16
JournalReligion
Volume38
Issue number1
Early online date3 Mar 2008
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2008

Fingerprint

theologian
sociologist
Religion
theology
Sociologists
Theologians
sociology

Cite this

William Robertson Smith: Sociologist or Theologian? / Segal, Robert Alan.

In: Religion, Vol. 38, No. 1, 03.2008, p. 9-24.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{94052776433f4622bb0618c50373f96c,
title = "William Robertson Smith: Sociologist or Theologian?",
abstract = "William Robertson Smith is often considered to be the first modern sociologist of religion. I argue that Smith was truly a pioneering sociologist of religion, but of “primitive” and ancient religion only. He pitted primitive and ancient religion against modern religion, which for him was religion of the individual rather than of the group. I suggest that Smith's sociologising of religion, as revolutionary as it was, stops short. Where his sociology ends, his theology begins.",
author = "Segal, {Robert Alan}",
year = "2008",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1016/j.religion.2008.01.009",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
pages = "9--24",
journal = "Religion",
issn = "0048-721X",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - William Robertson Smith: Sociologist or Theologian?

AU - Segal, Robert Alan

PY - 2008/3

Y1 - 2008/3

N2 - William Robertson Smith is often considered to be the first modern sociologist of religion. I argue that Smith was truly a pioneering sociologist of religion, but of “primitive” and ancient religion only. He pitted primitive and ancient religion against modern religion, which for him was religion of the individual rather than of the group. I suggest that Smith's sociologising of religion, as revolutionary as it was, stops short. Where his sociology ends, his theology begins.

AB - William Robertson Smith is often considered to be the first modern sociologist of religion. I argue that Smith was truly a pioneering sociologist of religion, but of “primitive” and ancient religion only. He pitted primitive and ancient religion against modern religion, which for him was religion of the individual rather than of the group. I suggest that Smith's sociologising of religion, as revolutionary as it was, stops short. Where his sociology ends, his theology begins.

U2 - 10.1016/j.religion.2008.01.009

DO - 10.1016/j.religion.2008.01.009

M3 - Article

VL - 38

SP - 9

EP - 24

JO - Religion

JF - Religion

SN - 0048-721X

IS - 1

ER -