Winter Foraging by Common Seals (Phoca Vitulina) in Relation to Food Availability in the Inner Moray Firth, N.E. Scotland

Paul Michael Thompson, Graham John Pierce, J R G Hislop, D Miller, Jane Diack

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

57 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

(1) Parallel studies of fish distribution and the diet and activity of common seals were made to assess the relationship between the seals' winter feeding activity and the distribution and abundance of their prey. Echosounder and trawling surveys revealed that a large part of the fish biomass was sprat and small herring, while faecal analyses showed that > 90% of common seal prey (by weight) were clupeoid fish.

(2) During the day, clupeoids concentrated in trenches and holes more than 12 m deep. Radio-tagged seals were located regularly over these areas. At night, clupeoid shoals rose in the water column and became more dispersed. Diel changes in seal activity patterns suggest that seals fed more often during the day.

(3) Prey sizes were estimated from the size of otoliths retrieved from seal feaces. Estimated sizes of clupeoids taken by seals were similar to the sizes of fish caught in trawls, even though estimates were not corrected to allow for partial digestion of otoliths. This suggests that the rapid otolith digestion rates previously reported from captive seals may have been artificially high, or that the Moray Firth seals selected fish larger than those caught in trawls.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)283-294
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Animal Ecology
Volume60
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - Feb 1991

Keywords

  • FEEDING-HABITS
  • HARBOR SEALS
  • OTOLITHS
  • FISH
  • CONSUMPTION
  • ERROR
  • FUR

Cite this

Winter Foraging by Common Seals (Phoca Vitulina) in Relation to Food Availability in the Inner Moray Firth, N.E. Scotland. / Thompson, Paul Michael; Pierce, Graham John; Hislop, J R G ; Miller, D ; Diack, Jane.

In: Journal of Animal Ecology, Vol. 60, No. 1, 02.1991, p. 283-294.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1ff19b8faff14b02b7035211d82f8fcd,
title = "Winter Foraging by Common Seals (Phoca Vitulina) in Relation to Food Availability in the Inner Moray Firth, N.E. Scotland",
abstract = "(1) Parallel studies of fish distribution and the diet and activity of common seals were made to assess the relationship between the seals' winter feeding activity and the distribution and abundance of their prey. Echosounder and trawling surveys revealed that a large part of the fish biomass was sprat and small herring, while faecal analyses showed that > 90{\%} of common seal prey (by weight) were clupeoid fish.(2) During the day, clupeoids concentrated in trenches and holes more than 12 m deep. Radio-tagged seals were located regularly over these areas. At night, clupeoid shoals rose in the water column and became more dispersed. Diel changes in seal activity patterns suggest that seals fed more often during the day.(3) Prey sizes were estimated from the size of otoliths retrieved from seal feaces. Estimated sizes of clupeoids taken by seals were similar to the sizes of fish caught in trawls, even though estimates were not corrected to allow for partial digestion of otoliths. This suggests that the rapid otolith digestion rates previously reported from captive seals may have been artificially high, or that the Moray Firth seals selected fish larger than those caught in trawls.",
keywords = "FEEDING-HABITS, HARBOR SEALS, OTOLITHS, FISH, CONSUMPTION, ERROR, FUR",
author = "Thompson, {Paul Michael} and Pierce, {Graham John} and Hislop, {J R G} and D Miller and Jane Diack",
year = "1991",
month = "2",
language = "English",
volume = "60",
pages = "283--294",
journal = "Journal of Animal Ecology",
issn = "0021-8790",
publisher = "BLACKWELL PUBLISHING LTD",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Winter Foraging by Common Seals (Phoca Vitulina) in Relation to Food Availability in the Inner Moray Firth, N.E. Scotland

AU - Thompson, Paul Michael

AU - Pierce, Graham John

AU - Hislop, J R G

AU - Miller, D

AU - Diack, Jane

PY - 1991/2

Y1 - 1991/2

N2 - (1) Parallel studies of fish distribution and the diet and activity of common seals were made to assess the relationship between the seals' winter feeding activity and the distribution and abundance of their prey. Echosounder and trawling surveys revealed that a large part of the fish biomass was sprat and small herring, while faecal analyses showed that > 90% of common seal prey (by weight) were clupeoid fish.(2) During the day, clupeoids concentrated in trenches and holes more than 12 m deep. Radio-tagged seals were located regularly over these areas. At night, clupeoid shoals rose in the water column and became more dispersed. Diel changes in seal activity patterns suggest that seals fed more often during the day.(3) Prey sizes were estimated from the size of otoliths retrieved from seal feaces. Estimated sizes of clupeoids taken by seals were similar to the sizes of fish caught in trawls, even though estimates were not corrected to allow for partial digestion of otoliths. This suggests that the rapid otolith digestion rates previously reported from captive seals may have been artificially high, or that the Moray Firth seals selected fish larger than those caught in trawls.

AB - (1) Parallel studies of fish distribution and the diet and activity of common seals were made to assess the relationship between the seals' winter feeding activity and the distribution and abundance of their prey. Echosounder and trawling surveys revealed that a large part of the fish biomass was sprat and small herring, while faecal analyses showed that > 90% of common seal prey (by weight) were clupeoid fish.(2) During the day, clupeoids concentrated in trenches and holes more than 12 m deep. Radio-tagged seals were located regularly over these areas. At night, clupeoid shoals rose in the water column and became more dispersed. Diel changes in seal activity patterns suggest that seals fed more often during the day.(3) Prey sizes were estimated from the size of otoliths retrieved from seal feaces. Estimated sizes of clupeoids taken by seals were similar to the sizes of fish caught in trawls, even though estimates were not corrected to allow for partial digestion of otoliths. This suggests that the rapid otolith digestion rates previously reported from captive seals may have been artificially high, or that the Moray Firth seals selected fish larger than those caught in trawls.

KW - FEEDING-HABITS

KW - HARBOR SEALS

KW - OTOLITHS

KW - FISH

KW - CONSUMPTION

KW - ERROR

KW - FUR

M3 - Article

VL - 60

SP - 283

EP - 294

JO - Journal of Animal Ecology

JF - Journal of Animal Ecology

SN - 0021-8790

IS - 1

ER -