Word order affects the time course of sentence formulation in Tzeltal

Elisabeth Norcliffe, Agnieszka E Konopka, Penelope Brown, Stephen Levinson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The scope of planning during sentence formulation is known to be flexible, as it can be influenced by speakers' communicative goals and language production pressures (among other factors). Two eye-tracked picture description experiments tested whether the time course of formulation is also modulated by grammatical structure and thus whether differences in linear word order across languages affect the breadth and order of conceptual and linguistic encoding operations. Native speakers of Tzeltal [a primarily verb–object–subject (VOS) language] and Dutch [a subject–verb–object (SVO) language] described pictures of transitive events. Analyses compared speakers' choice of sentence structure across events with more accessible and less accessible characters as well as the time course of formulation for sentences with different word orders. Character accessibility influenced subject selection in both languages in subject-initial and subject-final sentences, ruling against a radically incremental formulation process. In Tzeltal, subject-initial word orders were preferred over verb-initial orders when event characters had matching animacy features, suggesting a possible role for similarity-based interference in influencing word order choice. Time course analyses revealed a strong effect of sentence structure on formulation: In subject-initial sentences, in both Tzeltal and Dutch, event characters were largely fixated sequentially, while in verb-initial sentences in Tzeltal, relational information received priority over encoding of either character during the earliest stages of formulation. The results show a tight parallelism between grammatical structure and the order of encoding operations carried out during sentence formulation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1187-1208
Number of pages22
JournalLanguage cognition and neuroscience
Volume30
Issue number9
Early online date17 Feb 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Language
language
event
Linguistics
Population Groups
Patient Selection
interference
time
Time Course
linguistics
Pressure
planning
experiment
Encoding
Verbs
Grammatical Structure

Keywords

  • incrementality
  • message formulation
  • sentence formulation
  • cross-linguistic comparisons of sentence production
  • verb-initial languages

Cite this

Word order affects the time course of sentence formulation in Tzeltal. / Norcliffe, Elisabeth; Konopka, Agnieszka E; Brown, Penelope; Levinson, Stephen.

In: Language cognition and neuroscience, Vol. 30, No. 9, 2015, p. 1187-1208.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Norcliffe, Elisabeth ; Konopka, Agnieszka E ; Brown, Penelope ; Levinson, Stephen. / Word order affects the time course of sentence formulation in Tzeltal. In: Language cognition and neuroscience. 2015 ; Vol. 30, No. 9. pp. 1187-1208.
@article{8672bd0e4e014342ab5c6b519a39b021,
title = "Word order affects the time course of sentence formulation in Tzeltal",
abstract = "The scope of planning during sentence formulation is known to be flexible, as it can be influenced by speakers' communicative goals and language production pressures (among other factors). Two eye-tracked picture description experiments tested whether the time course of formulation is also modulated by grammatical structure and thus whether differences in linear word order across languages affect the breadth and order of conceptual and linguistic encoding operations. Native speakers of Tzeltal [a primarily verb–object–subject (VOS) language] and Dutch [a subject–verb–object (SVO) language] described pictures of transitive events. Analyses compared speakers' choice of sentence structure across events with more accessible and less accessible characters as well as the time course of formulation for sentences with different word orders. Character accessibility influenced subject selection in both languages in subject-initial and subject-final sentences, ruling against a radically incremental formulation process. In Tzeltal, subject-initial word orders were preferred over verb-initial orders when event characters had matching animacy features, suggesting a possible role for similarity-based interference in influencing word order choice. Time course analyses revealed a strong effect of sentence structure on formulation: In subject-initial sentences, in both Tzeltal and Dutch, event characters were largely fixated sequentially, while in verb-initial sentences in Tzeltal, relational information received priority over encoding of either character during the earliest stages of formulation. The results show a tight parallelism between grammatical structure and the order of encoding operations carried out during sentence formulation.",
keywords = "incrementality, message formulation, sentence formulation, cross-linguistic comparisons of sentence production, verb-initial languages",
author = "Elisabeth Norcliffe and Konopka, {Agnieszka E} and Penelope Brown and Stephen Levinson",
note = "Acknowledgements We thank Antun Guzman Osil and Manel Guzman Osil in Tenejapa and Juan M{\'e}ndez Gir{\'o}n at CIESAS, San Crist{\'o}bal de las Casas, for research assistance and transcriptions. We also thank Gilles Polian at CIESAS for research support. In Nijmegen, we thank Emiel van den Hoven and Fr{\'e}d{\'e}rique Schless for help with the Dutch data collection and transcriptions, Gabriela Garrido for additional experimental assistance, Francisco Torreira for Praat scripting and Tilman Harpe for drawing a selection of the picture stimuli. Finally, we are grateful for feedback from audiences at the Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, the Department of Comparative Linguistics at the University of Zurich, the 2013 Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing and at the symposium on ‘The Large Cognitive Implications of Small Languages’ at the 2014 American Academy of Arts and Sciences Annual Meeting. Disclosure statement No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors Funding This work was conducted within the framework of the ERC Advanced Grant [#269484] INTERACT, awarded to SCL",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1080/23273798.2015.1006238",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "1187--1208",
journal = "Language cognition and neuroscience",
issn = "2327-3798",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Word order affects the time course of sentence formulation in Tzeltal

AU - Norcliffe, Elisabeth

AU - Konopka, Agnieszka E

AU - Brown, Penelope

AU - Levinson, Stephen

N1 - Acknowledgements We thank Antun Guzman Osil and Manel Guzman Osil in Tenejapa and Juan Méndez Girón at CIESAS, San Cristóbal de las Casas, for research assistance and transcriptions. We also thank Gilles Polian at CIESAS for research support. In Nijmegen, we thank Emiel van den Hoven and Frédérique Schless for help with the Dutch data collection and transcriptions, Gabriela Garrido for additional experimental assistance, Francisco Torreira for Praat scripting and Tilman Harpe for drawing a selection of the picture stimuli. Finally, we are grateful for feedback from audiences at the Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, the Department of Comparative Linguistics at the University of Zurich, the 2013 Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing and at the symposium on ‘The Large Cognitive Implications of Small Languages’ at the 2014 American Academy of Arts and Sciences Annual Meeting. Disclosure statement No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors Funding This work was conducted within the framework of the ERC Advanced Grant [#269484] INTERACT, awarded to SCL

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - The scope of planning during sentence formulation is known to be flexible, as it can be influenced by speakers' communicative goals and language production pressures (among other factors). Two eye-tracked picture description experiments tested whether the time course of formulation is also modulated by grammatical structure and thus whether differences in linear word order across languages affect the breadth and order of conceptual and linguistic encoding operations. Native speakers of Tzeltal [a primarily verb–object–subject (VOS) language] and Dutch [a subject–verb–object (SVO) language] described pictures of transitive events. Analyses compared speakers' choice of sentence structure across events with more accessible and less accessible characters as well as the time course of formulation for sentences with different word orders. Character accessibility influenced subject selection in both languages in subject-initial and subject-final sentences, ruling against a radically incremental formulation process. In Tzeltal, subject-initial word orders were preferred over verb-initial orders when event characters had matching animacy features, suggesting a possible role for similarity-based interference in influencing word order choice. Time course analyses revealed a strong effect of sentence structure on formulation: In subject-initial sentences, in both Tzeltal and Dutch, event characters were largely fixated sequentially, while in verb-initial sentences in Tzeltal, relational information received priority over encoding of either character during the earliest stages of formulation. The results show a tight parallelism between grammatical structure and the order of encoding operations carried out during sentence formulation.

AB - The scope of planning during sentence formulation is known to be flexible, as it can be influenced by speakers' communicative goals and language production pressures (among other factors). Two eye-tracked picture description experiments tested whether the time course of formulation is also modulated by grammatical structure and thus whether differences in linear word order across languages affect the breadth and order of conceptual and linguistic encoding operations. Native speakers of Tzeltal [a primarily verb–object–subject (VOS) language] and Dutch [a subject–verb–object (SVO) language] described pictures of transitive events. Analyses compared speakers' choice of sentence structure across events with more accessible and less accessible characters as well as the time course of formulation for sentences with different word orders. Character accessibility influenced subject selection in both languages in subject-initial and subject-final sentences, ruling against a radically incremental formulation process. In Tzeltal, subject-initial word orders were preferred over verb-initial orders when event characters had matching animacy features, suggesting a possible role for similarity-based interference in influencing word order choice. Time course analyses revealed a strong effect of sentence structure on formulation: In subject-initial sentences, in both Tzeltal and Dutch, event characters were largely fixated sequentially, while in verb-initial sentences in Tzeltal, relational information received priority over encoding of either character during the earliest stages of formulation. The results show a tight parallelism between grammatical structure and the order of encoding operations carried out during sentence formulation.

KW - incrementality

KW - message formulation

KW - sentence formulation

KW - cross-linguistic comparisons of sentence production

KW - verb-initial languages

U2 - 10.1080/23273798.2015.1006238

DO - 10.1080/23273798.2015.1006238

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 1187

EP - 1208

JO - Language cognition and neuroscience

JF - Language cognition and neuroscience

SN - 2327-3798

IS - 9

ER -