World heritage and indigenous rights: Norwegian examples

Gro Birgit Ween

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article approaches Indigenous concerns with World Heritage through the use of three Norwegian Sámi sites. The article argues the importance of approaching World Heritage as a process. A process, in this context, is a multi-sited, multi-dimensional coming into being. Exploring the ways in which World Heritage sites are brought into existence provides the opportunity for a closer view of exactly how Indigenous rights are relevant. The three Norwegian Sámi cases examined confirm the need to maintain two perspectives of the use of Indigenous rights. Firstly, Indigenous rights are useful as a post-colonial trope, making visible the cultural gaze of World Heritage institutions and processes. Secondly, heritage protection processes have a concrete impact upon the lives of a people. Significant themes in the course of such processes are opportunities of co-management; the continuation of cultural practices and opportunities for economic development. While Norway, internationally speaking, is recognised for its Indigenous rights initiatives, cases of heritage protection have indicated the existence of several severe blind spots in the Sámi rights implementation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)257-270
Number of pages14
Journalinternational journal of heritage studies
Volume18
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2012

Fingerprint

World Heritage Site
co-management
comanagement
Norway
speaking
economic development
rights
world
Heritage
Indigenous rights
World Heritage
economics
Co-management
Economic development
Cultural practices
Cultural Practices
Tropes
Economic Development
Continuation
Visible

Keywords

  • cultural heritage
  • Sami
  • governance

Cite this

World heritage and indigenous rights : Norwegian examples. / Ween, Gro Birgit.

In: international journal of heritage studies, Vol. 18, No. 3, 03.2012, p. 257-270.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{72bba17c57884dd49c50807ef2625f97,
title = "World heritage and indigenous rights: Norwegian examples",
abstract = "This article approaches Indigenous concerns with World Heritage through the use of three Norwegian S{\'a}mi sites. The article argues the importance of approaching World Heritage as a process. A process, in this context, is a multi-sited, multi-dimensional coming into being. Exploring the ways in which World Heritage sites are brought into existence provides the opportunity for a closer view of exactly how Indigenous rights are relevant. The three Norwegian S{\'a}mi cases examined confirm the need to maintain two perspectives of the use of Indigenous rights. Firstly, Indigenous rights are useful as a post-colonial trope, making visible the cultural gaze of World Heritage institutions and processes. Secondly, heritage protection processes have a concrete impact upon the lives of a people. Significant themes in the course of such processes are opportunities of co-management; the continuation of cultural practices and opportunities for economic development. While Norway, internationally speaking, is recognised for its Indigenous rights initiatives, cases of heritage protection have indicated the existence of several severe blind spots in the S{\'a}mi rights implementation.",
keywords = "cultural heritage, Sami, governance",
author = "Ween, {Gro Birgit}",
year = "2012",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1080/13527258.2012.663779",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "257--270",
journal = "international journal of heritage studies",
issn = "1352-7258",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - World heritage and indigenous rights

T2 - Norwegian examples

AU - Ween, Gro Birgit

PY - 2012/3

Y1 - 2012/3

N2 - This article approaches Indigenous concerns with World Heritage through the use of three Norwegian Sámi sites. The article argues the importance of approaching World Heritage as a process. A process, in this context, is a multi-sited, multi-dimensional coming into being. Exploring the ways in which World Heritage sites are brought into existence provides the opportunity for a closer view of exactly how Indigenous rights are relevant. The three Norwegian Sámi cases examined confirm the need to maintain two perspectives of the use of Indigenous rights. Firstly, Indigenous rights are useful as a post-colonial trope, making visible the cultural gaze of World Heritage institutions and processes. Secondly, heritage protection processes have a concrete impact upon the lives of a people. Significant themes in the course of such processes are opportunities of co-management; the continuation of cultural practices and opportunities for economic development. While Norway, internationally speaking, is recognised for its Indigenous rights initiatives, cases of heritage protection have indicated the existence of several severe blind spots in the Sámi rights implementation.

AB - This article approaches Indigenous concerns with World Heritage through the use of three Norwegian Sámi sites. The article argues the importance of approaching World Heritage as a process. A process, in this context, is a multi-sited, multi-dimensional coming into being. Exploring the ways in which World Heritage sites are brought into existence provides the opportunity for a closer view of exactly how Indigenous rights are relevant. The three Norwegian Sámi cases examined confirm the need to maintain two perspectives of the use of Indigenous rights. Firstly, Indigenous rights are useful as a post-colonial trope, making visible the cultural gaze of World Heritage institutions and processes. Secondly, heritage protection processes have a concrete impact upon the lives of a people. Significant themes in the course of such processes are opportunities of co-management; the continuation of cultural practices and opportunities for economic development. While Norway, internationally speaking, is recognised for its Indigenous rights initiatives, cases of heritage protection have indicated the existence of several severe blind spots in the Sámi rights implementation.

KW - cultural heritage

KW - Sami

KW - governance

U2 - 10.1080/13527258.2012.663779

DO - 10.1080/13527258.2012.663779

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 257

EP - 270

JO - international journal of heritage studies

JF - international journal of heritage studies

SN - 1352-7258

IS - 3

ER -