You Cannot Judge a Book by Its Cover

The Problems with Journal Rankings

Alan Sangster* (Corresponding Author)

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Journal rankings lists have impacted and are impacting accounting educators and accounting education researchers around the world. Nowhere is the impact positive. It ranges from slight constraints on academic freedom to admonition, censure, reduced research allowances, non-promotion, non-short-listing for jobs, increased teaching loads, and re-designation as a non-researcher, all because the chosen research specialism of someone who was vocationally motivated to become a teacher of accounting is, ironically, accounting education. University managers believe that these journal ranking lists show that accounting faculty publish top-quality research on accounting regulation, financial markets, business finance, auditing, international accounting, management accounting, taxation, accounting in society, and more, but not on what they do in their ‘day job’ – teaching accounting. These same managers also believe that the journal ranking lists indicate that accounting faculty do not publish top-quality research in accounting history and accounting systems. And they also believe that journal ranking lists show that accounting faculty write top-quality research in education, history, and systems, but only if they publish it in specialist journals that do not have the word ‘accounting’ in their title, or in mainstream journals that do. Tarring everyone with the same brush because of the journal in which they publish is inequitable. We would not allow it in other walks of life. It is time the discrimination ended.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)175-186
Number of pages12
JournalAccounting Education
Volume24
Issue number3
Early online date30 Jun 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

ranking
Journal ranking
Research quality
teaching load
manager
education
auditing
Managers
Accounting education
history
financial market
taxation
finance
discrimination
educator
regulation

Keywords

  • academic freedom
  • bullying
  • discrimination
  • Journal rankings
  • mis-management

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Accounting
  • Education

Cite this

You Cannot Judge a Book by Its Cover : The Problems with Journal Rankings. / Sangster, Alan (Corresponding Author).

In: Accounting Education, Vol. 24, No. 3, 2015, p. 175-186.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a334375052064710987eaece8abc3989,
title = "You Cannot Judge a Book by Its Cover: The Problems with Journal Rankings",
abstract = "Journal rankings lists have impacted and are impacting accounting educators and accounting education researchers around the world. Nowhere is the impact positive. It ranges from slight constraints on academic freedom to admonition, censure, reduced research allowances, non-promotion, non-short-listing for jobs, increased teaching loads, and re-designation as a non-researcher, all because the chosen research specialism of someone who was vocationally motivated to become a teacher of accounting is, ironically, accounting education. University managers believe that these journal ranking lists show that accounting faculty publish top-quality research on accounting regulation, financial markets, business finance, auditing, international accounting, management accounting, taxation, accounting in society, and more, but not on what they do in their ‘day job’ – teaching accounting. These same managers also believe that the journal ranking lists indicate that accounting faculty do not publish top-quality research in accounting history and accounting systems. And they also believe that journal ranking lists show that accounting faculty write top-quality research in education, history, and systems, but only if they publish it in specialist journals that do not have the word ‘accounting’ in their title, or in mainstream journals that do. Tarring everyone with the same brush because of the journal in which they publish is inequitable. We would not allow it in other walks of life. It is time the discrimination ended.",
keywords = "academic freedom, bullying, discrimination, Journal rankings, mis-management",
author = "Alan Sangster",
note = "Acknowledgements I would like to thank Joan Ballantine, Edgard Cornacchione, Paul de Lange, Barbara Flood, Nick McGuigan, Pru Marriott, and Greg Stoner for their helpful comments on earlier versions of this paper. The views expressed are, however, my own.",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1080/09639284.2015.1055929",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "175--186",
journal = "Accounting Education",
issn = "0963-9284",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - You Cannot Judge a Book by Its Cover

T2 - The Problems with Journal Rankings

AU - Sangster, Alan

N1 - Acknowledgements I would like to thank Joan Ballantine, Edgard Cornacchione, Paul de Lange, Barbara Flood, Nick McGuigan, Pru Marriott, and Greg Stoner for their helpful comments on earlier versions of this paper. The views expressed are, however, my own.

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Journal rankings lists have impacted and are impacting accounting educators and accounting education researchers around the world. Nowhere is the impact positive. It ranges from slight constraints on academic freedom to admonition, censure, reduced research allowances, non-promotion, non-short-listing for jobs, increased teaching loads, and re-designation as a non-researcher, all because the chosen research specialism of someone who was vocationally motivated to become a teacher of accounting is, ironically, accounting education. University managers believe that these journal ranking lists show that accounting faculty publish top-quality research on accounting regulation, financial markets, business finance, auditing, international accounting, management accounting, taxation, accounting in society, and more, but not on what they do in their ‘day job’ – teaching accounting. These same managers also believe that the journal ranking lists indicate that accounting faculty do not publish top-quality research in accounting history and accounting systems. And they also believe that journal ranking lists show that accounting faculty write top-quality research in education, history, and systems, but only if they publish it in specialist journals that do not have the word ‘accounting’ in their title, or in mainstream journals that do. Tarring everyone with the same brush because of the journal in which they publish is inequitable. We would not allow it in other walks of life. It is time the discrimination ended.

AB - Journal rankings lists have impacted and are impacting accounting educators and accounting education researchers around the world. Nowhere is the impact positive. It ranges from slight constraints on academic freedom to admonition, censure, reduced research allowances, non-promotion, non-short-listing for jobs, increased teaching loads, and re-designation as a non-researcher, all because the chosen research specialism of someone who was vocationally motivated to become a teacher of accounting is, ironically, accounting education. University managers believe that these journal ranking lists show that accounting faculty publish top-quality research on accounting regulation, financial markets, business finance, auditing, international accounting, management accounting, taxation, accounting in society, and more, but not on what they do in their ‘day job’ – teaching accounting. These same managers also believe that the journal ranking lists indicate that accounting faculty do not publish top-quality research in accounting history and accounting systems. And they also believe that journal ranking lists show that accounting faculty write top-quality research in education, history, and systems, but only if they publish it in specialist journals that do not have the word ‘accounting’ in their title, or in mainstream journals that do. Tarring everyone with the same brush because of the journal in which they publish is inequitable. We would not allow it in other walks of life. It is time the discrimination ended.

KW - academic freedom

KW - bullying

KW - discrimination

KW - Journal rankings

KW - mis-management

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84934763967&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/09639284.2015.1055929

DO - 10.1080/09639284.2015.1055929

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 175

EP - 186

JO - Accounting Education

JF - Accounting Education

SN - 0963-9284

IS - 3

ER -